Skip to main content

Table 8 Predicted diet proportion of herbivorous cichlids in Lake Tanganyika from a Bayesian mixing model with δ13 C and δ15 N of each cichlid species as mixture data, those of periphyton within their territories and those of other benthic animals as source data

From: Depth segregation and diet disparity revealed by stable isotope analyses in sympatric herbivorous cichlids in Lake Tanganyika

cichlid species

periphyton within each territory

detritus

Atyidae/Ephemeroptera

Trichoptera

Chironomidae

Eretmodus cyanostictus

43.5 ± 20.7

24.2 ± 17.8

 8.2 ± 10.1

 7.5 ± 9.2

16.6 ± 13.7

Telmatochromis temporalis

14.6 ± 12.1

25.2 ± 16.9

31.3 ± 17.0

14.1 ± 11.7

14.8 ± 11.0

Variabilichromis moorii

22.0 ± 15.1

21.2 ± 16.5

20.7 ± 15.5

15.8 ± 13.2

20.2 ± 14.9

Pseudosimochromis curvifrons

44.0 ± 16.7

25.1 ± 17.2

10.8 ± 9.8

 7.7 ± 7.7

12.5 ± 11.8

Petrochromis macrognathus

34.3 ± 15.2

26.6 ± 18.5

11.9 ± 10.4

 9.2 ± 9.1

18.0 ± 14.1

Petrochromis polyodon

46.6 ± 21.9

22.2 ± 16.4

 8.3 ± 10.5

 7.3 ± 10.2

15.7 ± 13.7

Petrochromis horii

23.3 ± 15.0

28.9 ± 17.7

21.0 ± 15.3

14.6 ± 12.5

12.2 ± 11.6

Petrochromis trewavasae

29.5 ± 18.0

22.4 ± 16.9

16.5 ± 13.4

11.7 ± 11.6

20.0 ± 15.9

Tropheus moorii

33.0 ± 19.6

21.2 ± 16.4

15.0 ± 13.9

11.6 ± 12.1

19.2 ± 15.8

  1. Analyses were conducted by MixSIAR. δ13C and δ15N of Atyidae and Ephemeroptera are quite similar (as shown in Figure 1) and cannot be distinguished. The dominant dietary items are shown in bold.