Gene expression profiles and neural activities of Kenyon cell subtypes in the honeybee brain: identification of novel ‘middle-type’ Kenyon cells

In the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.), it has long been thought that the mushroom bodies, a higher-order center in the insect brain, comprise three distinct subtypes of intrinsic neurons called Kenyon cells. In class-I large-type Kenyon cells and class-I small-type Kenyon cells, the somata are localized at the edges and in the inner core of the mushroom body calyces, respectively. In class-II Kenyon cells, the somata are localized at the outer surface of the mushroom body calyces. The gene expression profiles of the large- and small-type Kenyon cells are distinct, suggesting that each exhibits distinct cellular characteristics. We recently identified a novel gene, mKast (middle-type Kenyon cell-preferential arrestin-related gene-1), which has a distinctive expression pattern in the Kenyon cells. Detailed expression analyses of mKast led to the discovery of novel ‘middle-type’ Kenyon cells characterized by their preferential mKast-expression in the mushroom bodies. The somata of the middle-type Kenyon cells are localized between the large- and small-type Kenyon cells, and the size of the middle-type Kenyon cell somata is intermediate between that of large- and small-type Kenyon cells. Middle-type Kenyon cells appear to differentiate from the large- and/or small-type Kenyon cell lineage(s). Neural activity mapping using an immediate early gene, kakusei, suggests that the small-type and some middle-type Kenyon cells are prominently active in the forager brain, suggesting a potential role in processing information during foraging flight. Our findings indicate that honeybee mushroom bodies in fact comprise four types of Kenyon cells with different molecular and cellular characteristics: the previously known class-I large- and small-type Kenyon cells, class-II Kenyon cells, and the newly identified middle-type Kenyon cells described in this review. As the cellular characteristics of the middle-type Kenyon cells are distinct from those of the large- and small-type Kenyon cells, their careful discrimination will be required in future studies of honeybee Kenyon cell subtypes. In this review, we summarize recent progress in analyzing the gene expression profiles and neural activities of the honeybee Kenyon cell subtypes, and discuss possible roles of each Kenyon cell subtype in the honeybee brain.


Background
In mammals, various advanced brain functions are distributed to distinct areas of the brain [1]. In insects, too, brain areas and functions are closely related. The insect brain contains major structures, such as the mushroom bodies (MBs, a higher-order brain center), antennal lobes (ALs, a primary olfactory and mechanosensory center), optic lobes (OLs, a primary center of visual information), and subesophageal ganglion (SOG, a center for taste and feeding behavior) (Fig. 1a) [2][3][4]. One of the most intriguing questions in insect neuroscience is how neural circuits regulate their intrinsic behaviors, especially social behaviors. The European honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) is a well-known eusocial insect and its behaviors, including dance communication, have been studied extensively [5][6][7].
Honeybees live in colonies that usually comprise a single queen (the reproductive caste) and several thousands of workers (the labor and non-reproductive caste), and from spring to autumn, several hundreds of drones. Queens and workers are female, and drones are male [5,6]. Workers exhibit an age-dependent 'division of labor'; for example, bees 6 to 12d of age take care of the brood inside the hives (nurse bees), whereas older bees (usually >16 d of age) collect nectar and pollen outside their hives (foragers) [5,6]. After a successful foraging flight, workers (dancers) convey food source location to their nestmates (followers) through dance communication [7]. These social characteristics have long attracted researchers.
Importantly, recent studies suggest some relations between honeybee MB functions and foraging behavior [8][9][10]. Insect MBs are a paired structure comprising two cup-like calyces, peduncles, and intrinsic neurons called Kenyon cells (KCs), which have distinct subtypes. The MB structures of the honeybee are elaborate compared with those of some other insect species (e.g., fruit fly). Honeybee KCs are categorized into three subtypes based on their morphology; class-I large-type KCs (lKCs or 'inner noncompact' KCs), class-I small type KCs (sKCs or 'inner compact' KCs), and class-II KCs (or 'outer compact' KCs). While the somata of class-I lKCs and sKCs are localized at the edges and inner core of the MB calyces, respectively, the somata of class-II KCs surround the outer surface of the MB calyces (Fig. 1b). KCs extend neurites that branch to form dendrites in the calyces and axons in the pedunculus [2][3][4]. Axons from the class-I KCs bifurcate to form two distinct lobes, called the medial and vertical lobes, while those from the class-II KCs form single lobe called the gamma lobe. The honeybee MB calyces are subdivided into three layers: the lip, collar, and basal ring (Fig. 1c). The lip receives olfactory information from the ALs, the collar receives visual information from the OLs, and the basal ring receives both olfactory and visual information [2][3][4][11][12][13].
The preferential expression in Drosophila MBs of some genes responsible for mutants in learning, such as dunce, rutabaga, and DCO, established the involvements of the MBs in learning and memory in the fruit fly [14][15][16]. In the honeybee, the MBs are involved in learning and memory, as well as multimodal sensory integration [17][18][19]. The MB neuropil volume depends on the division of labor of the workers [8], and while the complexity of the MB neuropil increases with age, foraging experience also enhances neuropil outgrowth [9]. A previous study reported that parasitoidism, rather than sociality, is associated with elaboration of the MBs in hymenopteran insect brains, and proposed that the cognitive demands of host-finding behavior in parasitic wasps drove the acquisition of the  [20] was modified and used for panels (b) and (c) evolutionarily novel MB architecture before sociality was acquired [10]. How each KC subtype contributes to MB function in honeybee social behaviors, including foraging behavior, however, remains largely unknown. Various genes are expressed in an MB-preferential or KC subtype-preferential manner in the honeybee brain, suggesting that each KC subtype in the honeybee has distinct molecular and cellular characteristics (see [20] for a previous review). Sequencing of the whole honeybee genome has greatly advanced molecular biologic studies of the honeybee [21,22]. A comprehensive search for genes preferentially expressed in honeybee OLs revealed the differential expression of one of the identified genes, termed mKast (middle-type Kenyon cell-preferential arrestin-related protein), in the MBs compared with other previously identified genes [23]. mKast is preferentially expressed not only in the OLs but also in a novel KC subtype, which we termed the 'middle-type' KCs (mKCs), in the MB calyces. This indicates that honeybee MBs actually comprise four KC subtypes: class-I lKCs, mKCs, and sKCs, and class-II KCs [23]. Careful discrimination of honeybee KC subtypes will require analysis of the function of each KC subtype by targeting genes expressed in an MB-and/or KC subtype-preferential manner in the honeybee brain.
In this review, we summarize recent progress in studies of brain region preferential gene expression patterns and neural activities in the honeybee brain, and discuss the possible roles of each KC subtype in the honeybee.

Review
Summary of genes expressed in a brain area-preferential manner in the honeybee brain Based on the assumption that some brain regions are related to honeybee social behaviors and/or advanced brain functions, many groups have searched for genes that are expressed in a brain area-preferential manner in the honeybee brain (Table 1) (see [20] for a previous review).
Of these five, Dop2 is unique in that its KC-subtype preferential expression changes with the division of labor of workers: Dop2 is preferentially expressed in the sKCs in newly emerged workers and nurse bees, while it is expressed in the whole MBs in foragers [42,43]. JHDK [33] and Tachykinin-related peptide (Trp) [44] are both expressed preferentially in both the outer part of the lKCs (previously termed 'L-1' and 'L-a' lKCs, respectively [33,44]) and the entire sKC, but not in the inner part of the lKCs ('L-2' and 'L-b' lKCs, respectively [33,44]), suggesting that lKCs could be further classified into subpopulations based on their gene expression profiles. Later, the 'inner part' of the lKCs was determined to correspond to the newly identified mKCs [23].
Many genes are preferentially expressed not only in the MBs, but also in some other brain areas: i.e., foraging (for) [45], Mahya [46] and mKast [23] etc. Other genes are preferentially expressed only in other brain areas, including the OLs, but not in the MBs; i.e., IP 3 kinase (IP 3 K) Type-B [47], misexpression suppressor of dominantnegative kinase suppressor of Ras 2 (MESK2) [31], glutamate decarboxylase (Gad) [48], futsch, and tau [31] (Table 1). Although no gene is reported to be preferentially expressed in class-II KCs, Apisα7-2 [49] is expressed in class-II KCs in the MBs and in other brain regions.
Identification of novel 'middle-type' KCs, which are characterized by preferential mKast-expression Previous studies were based on the notion that honeybee MBs comprise only three types of KCs: class I-lKCs, sKCs and class II KCs. We recently identified a novel type of KC, however, that we termed mKCs, as described below [23].
Earlier studies indicated that honeybees gauge flight distance based on the optic flow they perceive during the foraging flight [50,51]. As the honeybee OLs comprise distinct neuropil layers, the lamina, medulla and lobula, in which contrast, color and movement of the visual substance are processed, respectively (Fig. 2a) [52][53][54][55], we postulated that at least some sensory Table 1 Summary of genes expressed in a brain area-preferential manner in the honeybee brain

N=F=D=Q (OL)
Note that, in most studies, in situ hybridization was used for gene expression analysis, while northern blotting [47], transcriptome analysis [36] and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [43] were also used in some studies Original Genes for some major neurotransmitter receptors are also listed in this Table as references, though they show rather uniform expression in the whole brain; i.e., Dop1, Tyr1, OA1, Dop3 and 5-HT 7 f The terms 'Am' are omitted from gene names, which were used in the original papers, because only Apis mellifera genes are listed in this Table  information obtained via optic flow is processed in the OLs, and thus applied a combination of differential display and cDNA microarray methods to search for genes that are highly expressed in honeybee OLs [23,31]. Here we focus on one of the three identified genes, termed mKast (middle-type Kenyon cell preferential-arrestin related protein), which led to the discovery of the novel 'middle-type' Kenyon cells (Fig. 2) [23]. mKast (GB18367) encodes a predicted protein that has arrestin-like_N and arrestin-like_C domains, and low (~25%) sequence identity with mammalian arrestin domain-containing protein (ARRDC) 1-4 [23]. In addition to mKast, the honeybee genome contains three related genes encoding predicted proteins having 38%, 28% and 27% sequence identity with mKast, respectively. Interestingly, the genomes of some aculeate hymenopteran insects, such as the dwarf honeybee Apis florea, the bumblebee Bombus terrestris, the alfalfa leafcutter bee Megachile rotundata, and the parasitic jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis, contain genes with higher sequence identity to mKast (97%, 85%, 82%, and 56%, respectively). Some other insect and invertebrate species contain genes that are less related to mKast (sequence identities <~30%), suggesting that mKast may be unique to aculeate hymenopteran insects [23].
In the OLs, neurons with preferential expression of mKast are scattered in the lamina-medulla layer, whereas they are more widely distributed in the medulla-lobula layer (Fig. 2a). In contrast, the somata for neurons preferentially expressing mKast localize between the lKCs and sKCs in the MBs (Figs. 2 and 3). The MB area expressing mKast does not overlap with the MB areas expressing CaMKII or Mblk-1, which were originally considered to be preferentially expressed in the lKCs (Figs. 2b, 2c, 3 and 4) [25,35,36]. It is complementary with areas that express Trp or JHDK, which were originally reported to be preferentially expressed in the outer part of the lKCs and sKCs, but not in the inner part of the lKCs, which correspond to a novel KC subtype (Fig. 4) [33,44]. We termed this novel KC subtype characterized by the preferential mKast expression mKCs, as the size of the mKC somata is intermediate between that of the lKCs (7-9 μm) and sKCs (5-7 μm), and the somata are localized between the lKCs and sKCs (Fig. 2b and c) [23].

Functional categorization of genes preferentially expressed in honeybee MBs
As summarized in Table 1, various genes are expressed in an MB-and/or KC subtype-preferential manner in the honeybee brain. Interestingly, functional categorization of some of these genes implies that the lKCs, mKCs and sKCs have distinct functions in relation to honeybee behaviors and/or advanced brain functions. Here we provide examples of functional categorization of genes preferentially expressed in honeybee MBs, based on the current notion that honeybee MBs comprise four types of KCs: class-I lKCs, mKCs, sKCs and class-II KCs.
Five genes related to calcium signaling, which plays crucial roles in neurons involved in learning and memory [56][57][58], are preferentially expressed in the lKCs in the honeybee brain (  [59], while IP 3 P dephosphorylates IP 3 , affecting IP 3 R opening and resultant Ca 2+ concentration [60]. Reticulocalbin [32] is a calcium-binding protein localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. In addition, PKC [35] and PLCe [29] are preferentially expressed in the whole MBs. PKC is activated by diacylglycerol (DAG) [59]. Because IP 3 and DAG are generated by phosphatidylinositol-phospholipid hydrolysis, which is catalyzed by PLC, both PKC and PLC are involved in calcium signaling. Learning and c Double-fluorescence in situ hybridization for CaMKII (green), which is preferentially expressed in the lKCs, and mKast (magenta), which is preferentially expressed in the mKCs. Nuclei of the sKCs are counter-stained with DAPI (blue). Bar, 100 μm. For panels (b) and (c), an original figure from [23], which was published in PLOS ONE, an open access journal, was reused memory based on calcium signaling is conserved among animal species [56][57][58]. These findings suggest that synaptic plasticity based on calcium signaling is enhanced in the MBs, especially in the lKCs, in the honeybee brain (Fig. 3). There are, however, a few exceptions: type-A IP 3 K, which encodes an enzyme that terminates IP 3 signaling [61], is expressed in the whole brain, whereas type-B IP 3 K is expressed in an OLpreferential manner (Table 1) [47]. Therefore, not all genes involved in calcium signaling are expressed in a MB-preferential or lKC-preferential manner.
In contrast, EcR is preferentially expressed in the sKCs in the honeybee brain (Table 1, Figs. 3 and 4) [39]. We previously showed that the gene for an orphan nuclear Class-I middle-type KCs (mKCs) Preferential expression of a novel gene, termed mKast. Most mKCs are active in re-orienting worker brain, while some mKCs are active in forager brain.
Information processing during foraging and orientation flights?

Class-I small-type KCs (sKCs)
Preferential expression of EcR and HR38, the latter of which encodes an orphan receptor. Expression of HR38 increases with division of labors. Division of labor? Active in both forager and re-orienting worker brains.
Information processing during foraging and orientation flights?

Class-I large-type KCs (lKCs)
Preferential expression of genes involved in Ca 2+ -signaling, including CaMKII, and Mblk-1, whose C. elegans homolog functions in neural remodeling and olfactory learning.
Learning & memory? Active in re-orienting worker brain.
Information processing during orientation flight? indicates that there are no corresponding genes whose expression was experimentally confirmed or can safely be estimated from the previous results hormone receptor, HR38, is also preferentially expressed in the sKCs and at a high expression level in forager brains than in nurse bee brains [38]. In mosquito or Drosophila, HR38 responds to ecdysteroids other than ecdysone to induce a distinct set of target genes, unlike EcR [62,63]. We previously proposed that the mode of ecdysteroid-signaling in the sKCs changes from EcR-to HR38-dependent, according to the division of labor of workers [38]. In contrast, USP, which encodes a cofactor of EcR and HR38, is expressed in the entire MBs in 1-day old workers, while its expression in the sKCs is selectively reduced in foragers (Table 1) [64]. Changes in the expression of HR38 and USP in the sKCs may thus be related to the division of labor of workers and the interaction of HR38 with cofactors other than USP in forager sKCs. Not all ecdysteroid-regulated genes, however, are expressed in an sKC-preferential manner in the honeybee brain. While E74 is preferentially expressed in the sKCs (Table 1 and Fig. 4) [37], both Mblk-1/E93 and BR-C are preferentially expressed in the lKCs [25,30], and E75 is preferentially expressed in the whole MBs in the honeybee brain [30]. In Drosophila, EcR is responsible for the activation of ecdysone-regulated genes, including BR-C, E74, E75 and Mblk-1/E93, whereas Mblk-1/E93 is required for proper activation of BR-C, E74, and E75, which results in apoptosis of the larval salivary gland during metamorphosis [65]. Expression of some ecdysteroid-regulated genes that are preferentially expressed in the lKCs (Mblk-1/E93 [25] and BR-C [30]) or whole MBs (E75 [30]) may not be directly regulated by EcR or HR38, but rather by other transcription factors responding to ecdysteroid [64]. In nematode, MBR-1, an Mblk-1 homolog, functions in the pruning of excessive neurites during larval growth and is required for olfactory learning [66,67]. Assuming that Mblk-1 functions similarly in the honeybee brain, these findings provide further support that lKCs are related to memory and learning in the honeybee brain (Fig. 3).
We previously reported that genes for some enzymes involved in the latter stages of ecdysteroid synthesis [Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 306A1, CYP302A1 and CYP314A1] are predominantly expressed in not only in the ovaries but also in the brain, suggesting that ecdysteroids are de novo synthesized in the brains of worker honeybees [68]. It is plausible that ecdysteroids synthesized in the worker brain regulate ecdysteroid-signaling via EcR or HR38 therein, like 'neurosteroids' in the vertebrates [69]. The role of ecdysteroids in the insect brain, in regulating memory [70], sleep [71] and the circadian clock [72], has recently attracted the interest of researchers [73]. In addition, olfactory aversive learning is modulated by ecdysteroid injection in the honeybee [74]. It is thus plausible ecdysteroids synthesized in the brain and ecdysteroid-signaling also function in other biologic phenomena in the honeybee.
Neural activities in forager and re-orienting worker brains and differentiation of KC subtypes in developing pupal brains Some immediate early genes, such as kakusei homologs [76][77][78], c-Jun [79,80], Hr38 [81], and Egr [82,83], have been used to map active brain regions in insects. Among them, some reports studied neural activities in the brains of worker honeybees that have experienced orientation or foraging flight. Neural activity was detected mainly in the whole MBs in the brains of reorienting workers [76,77,82], whereas it was mainly detected in the center of the inside of the MB calyces in forager brains [76,77,83], indicating that distinct KC subtypes are mainly active in the brains of reorienting workers and foragers. The mKCs, however, were not distinguished from the lKCs and sKCs in these studies. Our in situ hybridization experiments for mKast, an mKC marker, and kakusei, a neural activity marker, using serial sections of forager brains revealed some overlap among areas expressing mKast or kakusei; in addition to the entire sKCs, some mKCs were also active in the forager brains [23]. It is thus possible that, whereas all lKCs, mKCs, and sKCs play roles in information-processing during the orientation flight, sKCs and some mKCs may also play roles in informationprocessing during the foraging flight (Fig. 3).
How mKCs differentiate in the developing pupal brain during metamorphosis remains a question. Adult honeybee MBs develop from prepupal stage to pupal stage P9 (prepupal day to pupal nine days after puparium formation) during metamorphosis. Earlier studies indicated that both lKCs and sKCs are produced by a cluster of proliferating MB neuroblasts located at the inner core of the MB calyces during pupal brain development [84]. The lKCs, which are produced by MB neuroblasts at early pupal stages, are pushed out of the MB calyces and cease proliferating till the P3 stage, while the sKCs, which are subsequently produced at the middle pupal stages till the P6 stage, replace MB neuroblasts at the P5 to P7 stages. The expression of mKast, which characterizes mKCs, starts at the P7 stage in an area sandwiched between the lKCs and sKCs and its expression becomes more prominent at the P8 stage, suggesting that the mKCs begin to differentiate after the lKCs and sKCs stop proliferating [23]. These findings suggest that the mKC lineage branches from lKC and/or sKC lineage(s) by modifying its cellular characteristics.
The identification of the mKCs remains incomplete, however, because the morphology of this cell type has not yet been determined. Further characterization of the morphology of both the dendrites in the calyces and the axons in the peduncles and lobes of the mKCs by immunostaining with anti-mKast antibodies, Golgi-staining, or using genome-editing to insert gfp downstream of the mKast promoter would allow for investigation of the synaptic connections of these cells with specific classes of input/output neurons of the MBs and elucidation of their physiologic functions.
How are mKCs discriminated from lKCs and sKCs?
Because mKCs have quite distinct molecular and cellular characteristics, it may be important to discriminate mKCs from lKCs and sKCs in future studies of honeybee KC subtypes. Currently, the only way to determine whether a gene of interest is expressed preferentially in mKCs is to compare gene expression patterns of mKast with the gene of interest using double-fluorescence in situ hybridization or single in situ hybridization in serial brain sections. Seven combinations of KC subtypes expressing the gene inside of the MB calyces (class-I KCs) can be imaged in the honeybee brain: preferential expression in 1) lKCs, 2) mKCs, 3) sKCs, 4) lKCs + mKCs, 5) mKCs + sKCs, 6) lKCs + sKCs, and 7) lKCs + mKCs +sKCs (the entire MBs) (Fig. 4).
As summarized in Fig. 4, the genes expressed in an MB and/or KC subtype-preferential manner in the honeybee brain can be categorized into the above seven expression patterns (Fig. 4a-g). There are 9, 1, 3, 0, 0, 2, and 3 genes that are safely categorized into each of the above seven categories based on their expression patterns reported previously (Fig. 4). It could be especially important to discriminate between patterns A and D as well as patterns C and E. Because the somata of the mKCs are localized between the lKCs and sKCs, if a gene of interest is expressed in both lKC and mKCs, the inner side of the expression area will appear to be thicker and extend more toward the inner core of the calyces than if the gene is expressed only in lKCs ( Fig. 4a  and d). If a gene of interest is expressed in both sKCs and mKCs, both the upper and lower sides of the expression area will appear expanded ( Fig. 4c and e). In situ hybridization studies would then be recommended to confirm the assumption.
Possible biological function of mKast and role of mKCs in the honeybee brain Although mKast contains both arrestin-like_N and_C domains, it has no apparent sequence identity with honeybee arrestins. Instead, mKast belongs to a protein superfamily that comprises mammalian ARRDCs [23]. In mammals, arrestins comprise a protein family that regulates the signaling and trafficking of various G protein-coupled receptors [85,86]. Recent studies revealed that mammalian arrestins and ARRDCs function in a hierarchical manner to traffic agonist-stimulated G protein-coupled receptors to sorting endosomes [87,88]. For example, while β-arrestin2 (arrestin-3) functions as the primary adaptor that binds agonist-stimulated β 2 adrenergic receptor (β 2 AR) to promote clathrin-dependent internalization, ARRDCs function as secondary adaptors that bind internalized β 2 AR complexes to traffic them to early endosomes [88]. Thus, mKast might also have a role in receptor regulation in neurons expressing mKast, including mKCs.
In contrast to the finding that both sKCs and lKCs are differentiated from the cluster of proliferating MB neuroblasts up to the P3 and P6 stages, respectively, mKast-expression begins at the P7 stage in the developing pupal brain [23]. It is thus plausible that mKCs differentiate from some lKC and/or sKC populations that have already ceased to proliferate. Considering that the preferential gene expression profile of mKCs is almost complementary to that of the lKCs and sKCs, and that preferential mKastexpression is unique to mKCs, it might be that the induction of mKast is somehow related to the establishment of the gene expression profile unique to mKCs.
Analysis of the molecular phylogenetic tree suggested that Aculeata Hymenoptera uniquely express mKast [23]. Thus, Aculeate Hymenoptera mKast homologs and mKCs have developed specific functions in the central nervous system during the evolution. Importantly, based on morphologic observations, it is reported that parasitoidism, and not sociality, is linked to the evolution of large and elaborate MBs in hymenopteran insect brains [10]. The authors proposed that the cognitive demands of hostfinding behavior in parasitoids drove the acquisition of the evolutionarily novel MB architecture [10], as illustrated in Fig. 5. The discrimination of KC subtypes based on KC-subtype preferential gene expression in hymenopteran insects other than honeybees, however, has not yet been examined. Our findings suggest a possible relationship between the MB functions involving mKCs expressing mKast and foraging behaviors of the hymenopteran insect species. To test this hypothesis, it will be important to 1) perform functional analysis of mKast using reverse genetic methods, 2) analyze the projection patterns of mKCs in the honeybee brain, and 3) perform expression analysis of mKast homologs in the brains of various hymenopteran insects. The CRISPR/Cas9 method [89,90] was recently demonstrated to be applicable to the honeybee [91], which will help to test the above hypothesis.

Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate that honeybee MBs actually comprise four distinct KC subtypes: the previously known class-I lKCs and sKCs and class-II KCs; and novel class-I mKCs characterized by the preferential expression of mKast. The gene expression profile of mKCs is almost complementary to that of the lKCs and sKCs and the mKC lineage seems to branch from lKC and/or sKC lineages after the cessation of lKC and sKC proliferation during metamorphosis. Although mKCs exhibit quite unique molecular and cellular characteristics in comparison with lKCs and sKCs, the fact that the somata of the mKCs are localized between lKCs and sKCs, and that the size of the mKC somata is just intermediate of those of lKCs and sKCs makes it difficult to discriminate mKCs from lKCs and sKCs with precision in the honeybee brain based on their morphologies. Comparison of the expression areas of mKast with that of the gene of interest using in situ hybridization is currently the only method to precisely discriminate whether or not the gene of interest is expressed in the mKCs, but the unique localization of mKCs may help to solve this problem.
The biological function of mKast and the role of mKCs in regulating honeybee social behaviors, especially foraging behaviors, are intriguing subjects for future research. Given that mKast belongs to a protein superfamily that contains mammalian ARRDCs, it is plausible that mKast also functions to regulate receptor function in honeybee brain mKCs. In addition, considering that mKast is likely to be unique to the aculeate hymenopteran insects and that sKCs and some mKCs could be involved in information processing during the foraging flight, it will be intriguing to investigate the relationship between the molecular evolution of mKast/acquisition of mKCs and the functional and morphologic evolution of the MBs of hymenopteran insects.