Skip to main content

Cellular and molecular aspects of oocyte maturation and fertilization: a perspective from the actin cytoskeleton


Much of the scientific knowledge on oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryonic development has come from the experiments using gametes of marine organisms that reproduce by external fertilization. In particular, echinoderm eggs have enabled the study of structural and biochemical changes related to meiotic maturation and fertilization owing to the abundant availability of large and transparent oocytes and eggs. Thus, in vitro studies of oocyte maturation and sperm-induced egg activation in starfish are carried out under experimental conditions that resemble those occurring in nature. During the maturation process, immature oocytes of starfish are released from the prophase of the first meiotic division, and acquire the competence to be fertilized through a highly programmed sequence of morphological and physiological changes at the oocyte surface. In addition, the changes in the cortical and nuclear regions are essential for normal and monospermic fertilization. This review summarizes the current state of research on the cortical actin cytoskeleton in mediating structural and physiological changes during oocyte maturation and sperm and egg activation in starfish and sea urchin. The common denominator in these studies with echinoderms is that exquisite rearrangements of the egg cortical actin filaments play pivotal roles in gamete interactions, Ca2+ signaling, exocytosis of cortical granules, and control of monospermic fertilization. In this review, we also compare findings from studies using invertebrate eggs with what is known about the contributions made by the actin cytoskeleton in mammalian eggs. Since the cortical actin cytoskeleton affects microvillar morphology, movement, and positioning of organelles and vesicles, and the topography of the egg surface, these changes have impacts on the fertilization process, as has been suggested by recent morphological studies on starfish oocytes and eggs using scanning electron microscopy. Drawing the parallelism between vitelline layer of echinoderm eggs and the zona pellucida of mammalian eggs, we also discuss the importance of the egg surface in mediating monospermic fertilization.

Graphical abstract


During gametogenesis, primordial germ-cells, which produce either eggs or spermatozoa in sexually-reproducing animals, undergo mitosis to increase in number and generate oogonia (in females) and spermatogonia (in males). With the onset of meiosis, these diploid cells are transformed into primary oocytes and spermatocytes. The meiotic (maturation) divisions that follow are markedly different in the two gametes. In male, each primary spermatocyte divides to produce four haploid spermatids, which differentiate into spermatozoa capable of fertilizing the eggs. In female, unequal partition of the cytoplasm results from two meiotic divisions that are asymmetric in size and lead to the formation of one large haploid oocyte and three polar bodies, the latter of which eventually degenerate. Another striking distinction between oocytes and spermatozoa is that the latter fertilize the eggs at the end of the meiotic divisions, whereas oocytes reach the period of fertilizability at different stages of the maturation process, depending on animal species. Indeed, marine invertebrate oocytes can be grouped into four different classes based on the meiotic stage at which fertilization takes place. Oocytes of various annelids and molluscs are fertilized at the GV stage, and the breakdown of the nuclear envelope is a sign that the oocytes have been activated. Eggs of nemerteans, ascidians, some annelids, and molluscs are blocked at the metaphase of the first meiotic division until fertilization triggers the completion of meiosis. The eggs of frogs and mammals are arrested and fertilized at metaphase II, i.e., after the second maturation spindle has formed and one polar body has been extruded [1,2,3,4]. Thus, as highlighted by Ernest Everett Just, “the fertilizability of all animal eggs hangs together with some condition in the cytoplasm of the egg and is independent of its nuclear state, as germinal vesicle, as first or second maturation-nucleus or as a completely matured nucleus” ([5], page 185), and may be related to the structural organization of the cortex of the female gametes.

Starfish and sea urchin eggs, which respectively are naturally fertilized before the extrusion of the first polar body and at the end of the two meiotic divisions, are useful animal models for the study of in vitro oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryonic development. This is due to the fact that they offer advantages not only in size and abundance but also in transparency of their cytoplasm and extracellular coats. These unique properties of the echinoderm eggs allow us to perform time-lapse imaging to follow the early structural and ionic events regulating the maturation process, during which the oocytes acquire the full cytoplasmic competence to be fertilized, as well as egg activation.

In starfish, by the time the growing oocytes arrive at the end of the prophase of the first meiotic division, they remain blocked at that stage until spawning (Fig. 1). The release from meiotic arrest, i.e. the maturation process, is triggered by the hormone 1-methyladenine (1-MA), which is secreted by the follicles cells surrounding the oocytes, while the fully grown immature oocytes are still in the ovary [6, 7]. The hormone acts on a yet-unidentified receptor on the cell surface, and thereby induces the breakdown of the envelope of the large nucleus known as germinal vesicle (GV). The germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) allows the intermixing of the nucleoplasm with the cytoplasm and is followed by formation of the polar bodies (Fig. 1e arrows). The spawned maturing oocytes at sea are at the stage of their GVBD (Fig. 1c), and are to be fertilized before the extrusion of the first polar body [8, 9]. At variance with oocytes of other vertebrate species in which a second meiotic arrest may occur at different cell cycle stages, starfish eggs matured in vitro can complete meiotic divisions without further maturation arrest.

Fig. 1

Light microscopy images of the ovary, and of living oocytes from the starfish Patiria pectinifera before and after 1-methyladenine (1-MA) treatment. a A ripe ovary dissected from P. pectinifera, containing numerous fully grown immature oocytes. b Immature oocytes isolated from the ovary are surrounded by a layer of follicle cells (FC); the large nucleus termed germinal vesicle (GV) is visible in the cytoplasm. c Maturing oocytes treated with 1-MA for 50 min; at this point in maturation, the FC are clustered to one side of the oocytes. This is the optimal time at which eggs can be successfully fertilized (i.e., monospermic fertilization). d Fertilized eggs 3 min after insemination are surrounded by the fertilization envelope (FE) as a result of the cortical granules exocytosis. e In the absence of fertilization, the first polar body (PB) forms 65 to 75 min after 1-MA application. f Extrusion of the second polar body 105 to 115 min after fertilization of eggs matured for 50 min with 1-MA (arrow)

Although sperm can penetrate immature oocytes of starfish before GVBD, cortical events that block the entry of supernumerary spermatozoa and ensure normal egg activation and cleavage take place within a precise time frame only after 1-MA stimulation. Indeed, it is well known that starfish eggs lose their ability to prevent polyspermic fertilization when inseminated after being treated with 1-MA for several hours (overripe eggs). These results indicate that the competence of the egg cytoplasm to be successfully fertilized is achieved at a precise maturation stage but is lost soon after that. Studies of oocyte maturation using Patiria pectinifera (a.k.a. Asterina pectinifera, Pacific Ocean) and Astropecten aranciacus (Mediterranean Sea) have made interesting observations about the time frame and other requirements for eggs’ optimal fertilizability and successful development [10,11,12].

Recent studies have provided evidence that the cortical actin cytoskeleton is a key player in the development of mature and competent eggs manifesting normal fertilization responses. It is well established that actin, which is one the most abundant and highly conserved proteins in eukaryotic cells, participates in the maintenance of cell shape, as well as in many cellular functions such as cell migration, growth, motility, organelle movement, polarization, and exocytosis/endocytosis. Together with myosin, actin can drive not only muscle contraction, but also regulation of genes in the nucleus [13]. Actin molecules undergo transition between monomeric globular (G-actin) and filamentous (F-actin) states under the control of its own concentration and by the action of numerous actin-binding proteins (ABPs) that affect their polymerization status. Following cell stimulation, extracellular signals are often transduced through Rho family GTPases, and their downstream effector ABPs control F-actin remodelling [14]. Furthermore, because of its high-affinity binding to Ca2+, it has been suggested that actin may act as an intracellular buffer storing and releasing Ca2+ [15,16,17]. Consistent with this, exposure of A. aranciacus mature eggs at their optimum period of fertilizability to actin-depolymerizing agents, such as latrunculin A (LAT-A) and mycalolide B, triggers intracellular increases of Ca2+ and plasma membrane depolarization following their activation [18,19,20]. New knowledge has been accumulated on the roles played by actin filaments in the control of dynamic events taking place during oocyte maturation, sperm and egg activation, and cleavage. The possibility of comparing the surface morphology and the structural organization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton of polyspermic immature oocytes and overripe eggs, and their behaviour upon insemination, with those of maturing oocytes inseminated in the period of optimum fertilizability has provided insights into the importance of the egg cortical F-actin structure and dynamics in the regulation of a normal maturation and monospermic fertilization.

A number of failures in assisted reproduction technology (ART) are linked to oocytes that are fertilized not in their optimum period of maturation, but after remaining in the oviduct (in vivo ageing) or culture (in vitro ageing) [21]. It is well established that the deteriorated cytoplasmic quality of oocytes often associated with maternal age negatively affects fertilization and increases the incidence of aneuploidy for most chromosomes [22, 23], raising the risk of spontaneous abortion and obstetric complications [24]. It is important to note that postovulatory ageing in mammalian eggs induces not only alterations in the cortical actin cytoskeleton, but also structural modifications in the zona pellucida (ZP) that regulates interactions between the egg and sperm [25]. In this regard, morpho-functional data showing how the structural organization of the cortex and surrounding layers of starfish eggs undergo dynamic changes during maturation and fertilization, and how such changes are deregulated in overripe eggs, may open new perspectives on the possible ways to understand and reverse oocyte ageing for clinical applications [26].

Actin-dependent cortical changes and the morphological alterations of the surface in the maturing eggs of starfish

GV-stage (immature) oocytes of P. pectinifera dissected from the ovary (Fig. 1a) are surrounded by two layers: i) the vitelline layer, which intimately adheres to the plasma membrane, and ii) the jelly coat of approximately 20 μm in thickness, in which the projections of the outermost layer of the follicle cells (FC) are embedded (Fig. 1b). Application of 1-MA for 50 min to immature oocytes induces migration and clustering of the FC to one side of the maturing oocytes, as shown in Fig. 1c. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs in Fig. 2 illustrate the dramatic morphological alteration of the vitelline layer (VL), which is easily visible in this species because the jelly coat is dissolved, and the cluster of FC (Fig. 1c) detaches from the maturing egg surface during the fixation procedure. Thus, in immature oocytes, cytoplasmic protrusions of the FC [27] make contacts with the oocyte plasma membrane through the pores over the VL surrounding the oocyte (Fig. 2a, arrows). About 50 min after 1-MA addition, i.e., at the optimum period for normal fertilization in this starfish species, the VL undergoes dramatic structural reorganization (Fig. 2c). These morphological changes may be essential to achieve the entry of a single sperm, since the addition of spermatozoa to eggs matured with 1-MA for 50 min always leads to monospermic fertilization (Fig. 2d, arrow) at variance with the immature oocytes, which are polyspermic at fertilization (Fig. 2b, arrows). It is interesting to note that the large number of spermatozoa penetrating the overripe eggs (treated for 6 h with 1-MA), despite the full elevation of the fertilization envelope (FE) (Fig. 2f), may represent the pathological conditions of ageing eggs that promote polyspermy. Indeed, the multiple sperm penetration in overripe unfertilized eggs may be linked to the structural modifications of the VL (the precursor of the FE) (Fig. 2e), which is more similar to that of fresh immature polyspermic oocytes (Fig. 2a and b). The modified VL structure of the overripe eggs may allow multiple sperm to interact with the egg plasma membrane, which leads to penetration of supernumerary spermatozoa through the openings on the VL (Fig. 2f, arrows). These results suggest that the changes of the VL induced by l-MA treatment at the egg surface level are sufficient to prevent or induce polyspermy by reducing or increasing interactions between sperm and the egg plasma membrane.

Fig. 2

Scanning electron micrographs of the surface of immature, mature and overripe eggs of P. pectinifera before and after fertilization. a An immature oocyte showing the projections of the follicle cells (FC, arrows) penetrating the vitelline layer (VL). b Polyspermic fertilization of an immature oocyte. Note the formation of the fertilization cones made by a large number of long microvilli protruding from the porous VL (arrows) and capturing the multiple sperm for their incorporation. c An oocyte treated with 1-MA for 50 min showing the VL without the openings characteristically present in the surface of immature oocytes in A. d The surface of a control egg fertilized at its optimal period of maturation (50 min 1-MA treatment) shows that, at variance with the multiple sperm penetration in immature oocytes shown in B, only the fertilizing sperm is captured by cytoplasmic protrusions emanating from the fertilization envelope (FE) (arrow). Note the different structure of the fertilization cone which is formed at this stage of maturation. e The structural modification of the VL of the overripe eggs makes this envelope more similar to that of immature oocytes and its openings. f Multiple sperm penetration (arrows) through the FE in an overripe egg upon insemination

In addition to inducing structural modifications at the surface of oocytes, 1-MA brings about changes in their cortex that are strictly dependent on the morphological and dynamical changes of actin filaments. One to two minutes after 1-MA application, spike-like projections containing actin filaments appear on the oocytes cortex and disappear at the time of GVBD [28]. Polymerization and depolymerization of actin during starfish oocyte maturation parallel the ultrastructural changes at the surface of the oocyte, which contains organelles, cortical granules (CG), and microvilli (comprising a core of actin filament bundles). Figure 3 shows scanning electron micrographs of oocytes of P. pectinifera before and after maturation by 1-MA that have been subsequently fractured during fixation to visualize the oocyte surface, microvilli, CG and organelles in the cortex and inner cytoplasm. Longer microvilli are seen in the immature oocytes beneath the VL (Fig. 3a) that is penetrated by the projections from the adhering FC [29]. The porous structure of the VL ensheathing the immature oocyte is evident in the SEM micrographs of Fig. 2a. Viewed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), microvilli are embedded in the VL covering the oocyte plasma membrane. When comparing Fig. 3a and b with c and d, it is also evident that 1-MA stimulation induces shortening of the microvilli at the time of GVBD, which represents the optimum period for a normal fertilization response. Interestingly, the structural reorganization of the oocyte cortex during maturation is accompanied by the changes in the electrophysiological properties of the oocyte plasma membrane in several animal species [30,31,32,33,34]. In starfish, K+ selective permeability diminishes following GVBD, leading to decreased conductance and less negative membrane potentials [33]. Such electrical changes have been suggested to be necessary for the generation of a more effective activation potential to electrically block the entry of additional spermatozoa [32, 35]. This hypothesis was supported by the finding that overripe and ageing P. pectinifera eggs, e. g., oocytes treated with 1-MA either for 120–180 or 180–240 min, display conductance much higher than the normally matured eggs and similar to that of immature polyspermic oocytes [31]. Both ageing eggs and immature oocytes are polyspermic after insemination. Our SEM images of the surface of overripe starfish eggs show an increased number of sperm spanning the FE, and show that this polyspermic penetration may be the result of the structural modification of the VL (Fig. 2e and f). Indeed, the formation of small cracks in the VL layer may allow the interactions of multiple sperm with the exposed plasma membrane regions. Thus, structural modifications of the VL together with the perturbation of the actin filaments of the underlying egg cortex may be directly responsible for the altered fertilization response and polyspermic fertilization (see below).

Fig. 3

Scanning and transmission electron micrographs of immature oocytes and mature eggs before and after fertilization. a A fractured immature oocyte showing microvilli (M) beneath the vitelline layer (VL) and organelles in the cytoplasm. b Microvilli project from the oocyte’s surface into the VL. Cortical granules (CG). c A mature egg treated with 1-MA for 50 min. At this optimal period of fertilizability, microvilli (M) beneath the VL are shorter. d The ultrastructure of a mature egg stimulated with 1-MA for 50 min shows shortened microvilli (M) and cortical granules (CG) positioned beneath the egg surface. e Fertilization envelope (FE) elevation in a mature egg 3 min after insemination showing the spherical bodies (arrow) in the perivitelline space following CG exocytosis. Hyaline layer (HL). f The electron-dense spherical bodies of the CG in the egg surface before fertilization in D are now seen in the perivitelline space (PS) upon insemination. Same magnification in all figures

Other examples of oocytes showing a low resting potential state in their optimal period of fertilizability are found in mammals. They are fertilized while arrested at the second metaphase, and their meiosis is completed following the Ca2+ signals triggered by the sperm. However, the low resting potential of such eggs does not ensure a fast electrical block to polyspermy. At fertilization, the egg plasma membrane undergoes hyperpolarization [36], not the depolarization; this is revealed by recordings made on several mammalian species that evoke small changes in membrane potential insufficient to establish a fast electrical block to polyspermy [37]. It is well known that polyspermy-blocking mechanisms in mammals may function at the level of the extracellular ZP of the egg, which is equivalent to the VL in echinoderms. Upon fusion with the plasma membrane, the acrosome-reacted sperm induces the release of intracellular Ca2+ in the egg which triggers the exocytosis of the CG [38]. The release of the enzymatic contents of the CG removes the sperm binding sites from the extracellular coat by biochemically modifying the ZP glycoproteins [39]. However, in mammals, little is known about the topography or structural organization of the eggs surface at their optimum time of fertilizability and after ageing. Reduced ability to establish a membrane block to polyspermy has been observed in aged post-ovulatory ZP-free mouse eggs following the development of cytoskeletal abnormalities in the cortex [40,41,42]. However, in addition to the well-known age-dependent alterations of the cortical actin filaments, the possibility must be considered that the structural modifications of ZP itself in senescent eggs [43] may play an important role in eliciting an aberrant fertilization response.

During the 1-MA-induced meiosis re-initiation, besides the ionic conductance changes in the plasma membrane, the maturing oocytes of starfish undergo structural maturation—the migration and accumulation of CG towards the oocyte cortex to form a uniform layer (Fig. 3d). In starfish and sea urchin oocytes, the pre-exocytotic granules become oriented perpendicular to the egg’s plasma membrane by an F-actin-dependent process [44,45,46]. The separation of the VL from the egg plasma membrane at fertilization [47] follows the exocytosis of their content into the perivitelline space (Fig. 3e and f). According to the prevailing view, the formation of the FE acts as a slow mechanical block to the entry of additional spermatozoa. In line with this idea, it is accepted that immature oocytes undergo multiple sperm penetration (Fig. 2b) because of their inadequacy to undergo exocytosis to form the FE [48]. However it has been recently demonstrated that multiple sperm penetration occurs in overripe starfish eggs [11, 12], and in sea urchin eggs [49] in which the cortical actin cytoskeleton has been perturbed by actin drugs. In both cases, polyspermy can take place in the presence of a normal elevation of the FE as shown in Fig. 2f.

The mechanical and morphological changes associated with the maturation of starfish oocytes are indicated by the reduction of the stiffness of the oocytes cortex at the time of GVBD, and by increased stiffness during the formation of the two polar bodies; both of these changes in stiffness are sensitive to cytochalasin, which disrupts F-actin [50, 51]. In line with the selective cortical actin changes at the animal pole during polar body formation, a quantitative analysis has shown that actin filaments are differentially distributed in the oocyte cortex [52]. Furthermore, the two distinct pools of F-actin undergoing different polymerization/depolymerization cycles that have been characterized could account for the mechanical changes of the starfish oocyte cortex during maturation [53].

At variance with mammalian oocytes in which the GV is located in the centre of the oocyte where the meiotic spindle forms before migrating towards the oocyte cortex through a F-actin-based mechanism [54,55,56,57,58], the nucleus of a starfish oocyte is positioned near the surface at the animal pole by the microtubular structures and actin filaments [59, 60]. While treatment with microtubule-disrupting drugs does not modify the changes in GV morphology that precede the disassembly of the nuclear envelope, F-actin depolymerizing drugs lengthen the onset of GVBD [61]. These results highlight the important role played by microfilaments in the disassembly of the nuclear envelope and the subsequent intermixing of the nucleoplasm with the cytoplasm, a process that is essential for the changes of the egg membrane potential and for the generation of a normal Ca2+ response at fertilization [31, 33, 62]. Actin clustering around chromosomes has also been reported at early steps of oocyte meiosis in several species. In starfish, the very large size of the GV and the small meiotic spindle anchored to the oocyte cortex make it difficult for microtubules to capture chromosomes, and contractile actin filament networks mediate transport of chromosomes to the assembling microtubule spindle [63]. During maturation of mouse oocytes, the migration of CG and meiotic spindle to the animal pole accompanying the changes in the distribution of cortical actin is essential for the establishment of the oocyte polarity, which is indicated by the formation of a thick actin cap overlaying the meiotic spindle and by the disappearance of CG and microvilli [56, 64].

Calcium signals during starfish oocyte maturation: role of the cortical actin dynamics

The location of 1-MA receptors in starfish oocytes has been the subject of intense investigation since microvilli are covered by a dense VL (Fig. 3b). Experiments with oocytes exposed to 1-MA after the VL was removed by trypsin [65] or separated from the plasma membrane by the divalent ionophore A-23187 [66] suggested that 1-MA acts on the oocyte plasma membrane. In line with this, microinjection of a larger amount of 1-MA into the cytoplasm of immature oocytes failed to promote maturation and GVBD [67]. The porous structure of the VL on the surface of immature oocytes (Fig. 2a) supports the idea of a direct access of 1-MA to the oocyte plasma membrane.

At variance with other animal species in which the complex signaling pathways regulating oocyte maturation have not been fully elucidated, those leading to meiosis resumption and their downstream effectors are relatively well documented in starfish. After 1-MA exposure, immature oocytes begin to form a cytoplasmic factor before GVBD occurs. The maturation promoting factor (MPF) containing cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) thus induces entry into meiotic M-phase by phosphorylating its substrate proteins needed for disassembly of the nuclear lamina, and thereby promotes GVBD [68]. The mediator of the 1-MA-coupled G-protein signaling pathway leading to MPF activation is phosphorylation of the protein kinase Akt/PKB, which has two main effects: i) inhibiting the Myt1 that otherwise inactivates MPF, ii) upregulating Cdc25, a phosphatase required for the activation of MPF [69]. MPF was first identified in the oocytes of the frog Rana pipiens by Masui and Markert [70] and later detected in a variety of organisms such as starfish, sea urchin, clams, fishes, mammals and yeast [71,72,73]. Cdk1 is activated by its binding to the regulatory subunit cyclin B (cyclin B/Cdk1), and inactivated through the separation from cyclin B, whose degradation occurs at the end of each M-phase. When mature oocytes of several animal species undergo metaphase arrest, MPF activity is very high and the intracellular Ca2+ increase at fertilization downregulates MPF and promotes completion of meiosis (see below).

The importance of Ca2+ signals in oocyte maturation has been established for many animal species. In starfish, 1-MA exposure could trigger a transient Ca2+ increase in the cytoplasm of immature oocytes and from the cell extract enriched with plasma membrane [74]. Nonetheless, the failure to detect 1-MA-induced Ca2+ changes in several species of starfish has led to the conclusion that GVBD and the continuation of maturation (meiotic) cycle were not Ca2+-dependent [75, 76]. However, results from our laboratory have shown that, in addition to a cytoplasmic Ca2+ transient, 1-MA induces a nuclear Ca2+ increase which was essential for the continuation of meiosis. Moreover, direct microinjection of the Ca2+ chelator BAPTA into the GV of the starfish oocyte prevented the disassembly of the nuclear envelope and the intermixing of the nucleoplasm with the cytoplasm [77, 78]. These results showed that a Ca2+ increase in the nucleus, not in the cytoplasm, was essential for meiosis continuation. Calmodulin (CaM) was identified as a possible downstream target of the 1-MA Ca2+ signals, since microinjection of antibodies against CaM directly into the GV of immature oocytes blocked meiosis progression [79]. Later studies, using more advanced imaging technology, have allowed us to detect an intracellular Ca2+ increase only a few minutes after 1-MA application. The increase of Ca2+ always starts at the vegetal hemisphere of the oocyte and is independent of its position in the chamber, as the oocyte surface was entirely exposed to the hormone. Furthermore, the Ca2+ transient induced by 1-MA failed to spread globally to the inner cytoplasm, but was localized to the oocyte cortex. As for the nature of the 1-MA-triggered Ca2+ signal, our laboratory has found that it was not linked to extracellular Ca2+, but strictly correlated to the structural organization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton [80]. A link between the 1-MA-induced cytoskeletal changes and the modulation of the Ca2+ release mediated by G-proteins has been provided by the microinjection of the non-hydrolyzable analogue of GTP and GDP. We have found that GTPγS induced a Ca2+ signal similar to that triggered by 1-MA, whereas GDPβS induced striking modifications of the cortical actin network and significantly inhibited the 1-MA Ca2+ signal [81]. The F-actin-dependent cortical Ca2+ increase, which runs in the oocyte cortex from the vegetal to the animal hemisphere, is followed by the subsequent increase of Ca2+ in the nucleus located in the latter hemisphere [80].

The universal signal for egg activation and embryo development at fertilization is an increase in intracellular Ca2+ following precise, species-specific, spatiotemporal patterns. The ability of an egg to produce appropriate Ca2+ signals at fertilization is acquired during oocyte maturation, encompassing resumption of meiosis and progression to meiosis II. In starfish, the same amount of the Ca2+-linked second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) microinjected into mature eggs induces a release of Ca2+ much higher than that elicited in immature oocytes. This higher Ca2+ increase does not coincide with the increased Ca2+ contents in the restructuring ER, but is due to the enhanced sensitivity of the Ca2+ stores to IP3 [82, 83]. The results of the studies on the global photo-activation of caged IP3 in the maturing oocyte have revealed that the sensitivity of the Ca2+ stores to IP3 developed with a spatial pattern similar to that of MPF, i.e., it started at the animal hemisphere and propagated towards the vegetal side [84, 85]. Studies on oocytes stimulated with 1-MA after the surgical removal of the GV have shown that the increased sensitivity to IP3 in maturing oocytes is correlated with the sequential activation of MPF in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Since MPF did not directly phosphorylate IP3 receptors (IP3R) as shown in other systems, an alternative hypothesis was proposed in which some components of the actin cytoskeleton may be phosphorylated by MPF and thereby produce much higher release of Ca2+ in response to IP3 [85]. Supporting the idea that the IP3-dependent Ca2+ release mechanism is modulated by microfilaments, our laboratory had previously found that microinjection of actin-binding protein cofilin into starfish eggs significantly enhances the Ca2+ release in response to IP3 or fertilizing sperm [86]. Furthermore, when mature eggs of starfish were exposed to actin-depolymerizing drug LAT-A, they exhibited intracellular Ca2+ increases that was reminiscent of the Ca2+ response in fertilized eggs [18, 20]. Interestingly, LAT-A was ineffective in inducing a Ca2+ response when applied to GV stage oocytes [18], which have quite different actin dynamics and cytoskeletal structures compared with the mature eggs (see below). In line with a role of F-actin in modulating the IP3-sensitive Ca2+ response, it has been shown that the sensitization of the Ca2+ stores to IP3 during oocyte maturation coincided with the ability of LAT-A to release Ca2+ from maturing eggs [85]. Further studies on the Ca2+ release mechanisms activated by LAT-A have now shown that its effect on actin filaments occurs via actin-dependent production of IP3 following stimulation of PLC, and it is not linked to sensitization of the Ca2+ stores to IP3 [20]. It is interesting to note that, at variance with starfish, Paracentrotus lividus (sea urchin) eggs exposed to LAT-A induced an increased production of IP3, but it did not lead to an intracellular Ca2+ increase [20]. These results indicate that the intracellular Ca2+ stores of the eggs of this species are less sensitive to the action of IP3, arguing against the previously suggested idea that IP3 is the Ca2+-linked second messenger produced in sea urchin eggs upon fertilization [87]. Recently, in addition to the 1-MA-triggered cortical Ca2+ wave that occurs a few minutes after its application, we have detected a train of Ca2+ spikes at the time of GVBD in the maturing oocytes of P. pectinifera, which are strictly linked to Ca2+ influx because they are inhibited when the oocytes were exposed to 1-MA in Ca2+-free seawater [88]. The occurrence of these cortical Ca2+ increases requires the presence of GV and the rearrangement of the cortical actin cytoskeleton. This actin-dependent structural modification of the oocyte cortex, concomitant with Ca2+ influxes at the time of GVBD, may be related to the changes in microvilli length (shortening) (Fig. 3) and the shift of the resting membrane potential in the maturing oocytes [16, 32]. The physiological significance of these Ca2+ influxes at the late phase of maturation was demonstrated by the finding that P. pectinifera oocytes matured in Ca2+-free seawater exhibited significantly altered actin cytoskeleton and CG distribution, as well as compromised Ca2+ responses and low rate of successful development following the fertilization in normal seawater [88].

Proper reorganization of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that occurs during oocyte maturation correlates with the higher release of Ca2+ by IP3 also in the eggs of mammals. In mouse oocytes, the spatio-temporal dynamics of the cortical ER clustering at metaphase II, which is essential for the generation of normal Ca2+ oscillations, has been shown to be mainly mediated by microfilaments [89]. A recent comparison of the subcellular compartments of human oocytes matured in vivo (second metaphase) with those of denuded immature oocytes cultured for 6–8 h to the completion of meiosis has revealed a significant difference in the thickness of the cortical actin networks [90]. The alteration of the actin cytoskeleton in the oocytes matured in vitro may in part explain the compromised sensitivity to IP3 and the Ca2+ response at fertilization as well as low developmental competence [91].

Contribution of actin dynamics to sperm and egg activation

A prior activation of the sperm by the egg’s envelopes is a prerequisite for successful fertilization [92,93,94]. Observations of living spermatozoa with a phase contrast microscope and the visualization of fixed samples using electron microscopy has allowed J. C. Dan to discover that the acrosome reaction (AR) in sea urchin, starfish and several other marine invertebrates is the essential mechanism for the sperm activation and the subsequent egg penetration [95]. In sea urchin, the first sperm activation is the AR which occurs when a sperm receptor makes a contact with specific sulphated fucans in the egg jelly coat [96]. This contact triggers exocytosis of the acrosome vesicle located in the apical region of the sperm, which contains bindin, an adhesive protein promoting species-specific gamete binding [97]. Simultaneously, rapid polymerization of G-actin forms the ‘acrosomal process’ [98]. The role of Ca2+ in the regulation of the AR in sea urchin sperm was first suggested by Dan [98], and further evidence was provided by use of the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 or by simply increasing the external pH in the presence of Ca2+. Both treatments initiated the internal polymerization of actin in the acrosomal process [99,100,101,102]. The sperm of starfish has been a particularly useful model to study the egg-jelly signaling molecules for triggering AR as well as for the role played by actin filaments in sperm-egg interaction and penetration (see below). Upon contacting the outermost jelly coat layer, a long acrosomal process (Fig. 4b) containing actin filaments is formed following simultaneous Ca2+ entry and pH increase in the sperm. It has been known that at least three different molecules of the starfish jelly coat act in concert to induce the structural and biochemical changes in sperm, which lead to the formation of the acrosomal process [103]. The tip of the long acrosomal process reaches the egg surface and promotes the simultaneous Ca2+ influx into the periphery of the egg and the propagation of the Ca2+ wave (Fig. 4c). All this takes place while sperm head itself is still far away from the egg surface [104, 105]. On the other hand, mammalian spermatozoa undergo a series of more complicated physiological and biochemical modifications collectively called ‘capacitation,’ while they reside inside the female reproductive tract for several hours before fertilization. Signal transduction pathways leading to actin polymerization in mammalian sperm capacitation through the activation of phospholipase D have been elucidated [106]. Very recently, a role for PIP2 and its downstream effector actin-severing protein gelsolin has been implicated in regulating sperm motility during sperm capacitation. Gelsolin, which is inactivated by its binding to PIP2, translocates from the sperm tail to the head, allowing an increase in F-actin in the tail and increased sperm motility [107, 108]. Only capacitated sperm can undergo AR which occurs during sperm penetration through the egg investments of ovulated eggs. It was shown that the binding of capacitated sperm to the egg ZP induces a Ca2+ influx through Ca2+ store depletion–activated channels. This sustained Ca2+ increase activates actin-severing proteins leading to depolymerization of F-actin network between the plasma and outer acrosomal membranes allowing the contact and fusion of the membranes to accomplish AR [109]. However, the site at which the AR must take place is still controversial [110]. In human sperm, other regions containing actin include the acrosomal space, the equatorial and post-acrosomal regions, and the tail.

Fig. 4

Acrosome reaction in P. pectinifera spermatozoa and the sperm-induced Ca2+ responses in the egg. a Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of spermatozoa fixed in natural seawater without eggs. No sign of acrosome reaction is present. bP. pectinifera spermatozoa on the egg surface after acrosome reaction has taken place (see the long filamentous process, AP). c Ca2+ signals in a mature egg of Astropecten aranciacus following the interaction of the tip of the AP with the egg surface. A simultaneous increase of Ca2+ over the entire periphery of the egg (cortical flash, CF) is observed when the fertilizing sperm head (marked in red dot) is still in the outer jelly coat (JC) (t = 0:17). This Ca2+ increase is followed by a Ca2+ wave that starts from the sperm-egg interaction and propagates to the opposite side of the egg, while the head of the sperm is still far away from the egg surface (t = 0:20). Only after the Ca2+ wave has spread globally to the opposite side do sperm become incorporated into the egg by passing through the FE

Even if the first evidence for a sperm-induced Ca2+ has been produced many decades ago on experiments in fish eggs [111], the concept that the intracellular calcium increase is essential for egg activation has a long history. It has been known for a long time that “a striking effect subsequent to insemination is the dissolution of the egg cortex” [112], which was later shown to be due to the release of bound calcium from the protoplasmic cortex [113, 114]. This is then followed by a very rapid recovery of the ectoplasm after membrane separation [112]. The cortex dissolution starts at the site of the sperm-egg interaction and propagates as a wave along the egg surface. The cortical response of the egg, which has now been described in detail, is the result of the release of the GC contents into the perivitelline space (Fig. 3e and f) formed by the separation of the VL from the egg plasma membrane to form the FE [115]. Because other sperm cannot enter the egg in any area over which the wave has passed, Just [116] has called the reaction a “wave of negativity” which makes the egg surface refractory to the interaction with additional spermatozoa. Thus the idea that this rapid change of the cortex, which is immediately completed when the fertilizing sperm touches the egg surface, and not the separation of the VL from the egg (which occurs too late), is the fast mechanism preventing polyspermy at fertilization was originally suggested one hundred years ago [116]. Activation of the starfish and sea urchin eggs by the fertilizing sperm during or at the end of the maturation process, respectively, is marked by dramatic structural changes at the egg surface and by the concomitant alterations in the plasma membrane permeability and the intracellular calcium increase [60]. In sea urchin, electrophysiological studies have recorded depolarization of egg membrane potential 1 to 3 s after insemination as a result of increased Na+ permeability. This depolarization step is followed about 13 s later by a slower but longer lasting depolarization, which is called ‘fertilization potential’ or ‘activation potential’ [117,118,119]. In starfish and sea urchin eggs, the depolarization step and the fertilization potential precisely mirror the patterns of the Ca2+ influx, i.e., the cortical flash (CF), and the Ca2+ wave in the egg at fertilization [60]. In starfish the time lag between the Ca2+ influx and the onset of wave is much shorter, e.g., 2 s. The different kinetics of the electrical and Ca2+ changes in the two species probably reflects differences in the structural organization of their egg cortices [120]. As for the significance of this earliest electrical event at fertilization, L.A. Jaffe [35] suggested that the activation potential going positive values was responsible for the establishment of a fast block to polyspermy. While such rapid polyspermy-preventing mechanism has been suggested to act in diverse organisms [121, 122], other authors have ruled out the possibility that the fast electrical block ensures monospermy in sea urchin eggs [123, 124]. In line with this, and at variance with the prevailing view that emphasises the depolarization of the egg plasma membrane as the fast mechanism to prevent polyspermy, our laboratory has recently provided evidence that sea urchin eggs remain mostly monospermic, instead of exhibiting the expected polyspermy, when fertilized at conditions that lower the fertilization potential, i.e., artificial seawater with reduced amount of Na+ [125,126,127]. As was previously suggested ([5] on page 182), our results have shown that the observed abnormal cleavage of the eggs fertilized in low Na+ is due to alterations in cortical actin filament dynamics, and it is not the result of the formation of multiple mitotic spindles following aberrant microtubules organization exerted by supernumerary sperm-centrosomes [35, 128, 129]. Furthermore, the FE, which is too slow to act as a mechanical block to polyspermy, is inadequate to prevent entry of additional spermatozoa even when it is fully elevated in sea urchin and starfish eggs [11, 12, 49].

Since the sperm-induced Ca2+ signals activates the zygote to initiate embryonic development, one of the major problems in this field for decades has been to understand the mechanisms of the signal transduction leading to the Ca2+ influx and the intracellular Ca2+ release at fertilization [130]. In sea urchin eggs, a Ca2+ entry prior to the exocytosis of the cortical granules has been visualized at the cell periphery in eggs loaded with Ca2+ sensitive dyes [49, 131], raising the question about its role in egg activation. By contrast, later studies showed that sea urchin eggs exposed to the ionophore A23187 facilitating the transport of Ca2+ across the plasma membrane were able to undergo early activation and metabolic changes similar to those occurring during normal fertilization [132, 133]. Furthermore, the findings that spermatozoa whose AR had been induced by seawater containing jelly coat components released from the eggs could fertilize eggs even in Ca2+ free seawater [134] added weight to the intracellular origin of Ca2+ liberation at fertilization. However, in the experiments on the activation of sea urchin eggs by A23187, the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores was judged only by the occurrence of the elevation of the VL in sea urchin eggs [132]. A comparison by Ca2+ imaging between the patterns of Ca2+ release induced by activation of sea urchin eggs by sperm or by a A23187 had not been made, unlike in the fish eggs [111]. Apart from that, recent studies on the effect of a short (5 min) application of another Ca2+ ionophore, ionomycin, to immature starfish oocytes have shown that ionomycin induced a dramatic rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton in the cytoplasm and egg cortex of the oocytes that led to microvilli retraction and disruption and fusion of cortical granules with vesicles. When these ionomycin-pretreated oocytes were matured and fertilized, they gave rise to altered Ca2+ responses, (substantial suppression of the CF and delayed Ca2+ wave) and inhibition of the CG exocytosis [135]. The results showed that ionomycin compromised the fertilization response and subsequent cleavage by inducing non-physiological F-actin-based changes of the egg cortex [29].

In mammals, the fertilizable oocyte is arrested at metaphase of second meiotic division due to the high activity of MPF and of the MAPK kinase, (M-phase activating protein kinase), and inhibition of anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C) [136]. Following insemination, the sperm-induced Ca2+ signals triggers inactivation of the two kinases, transition from metaphase to anaphase by the CaMKII-dependent activation of APC/C, inactivation of MPF, and initiation of embryo development [137]. At fertilization of mammalian oocytes, it is widely accepted that a series of spatio-temporal Ca2+ oscillations is triggered upon delivery of a soluble sperm-specific factor identified as a PLCζ that enters the egg upon gamete fusion [138, 139]. That PLCζ promotes IP3 formation through the hydrolysis of PIP2 and Ca2+ release upon IP3-gated opening of IP3Rs on the ER has been claimed by experiments in which the microinjection of anti-IP3Rs antibodies inhibited the sperm-induced Ca2+ release [140]. At variance with PLCδ1, PLCζ lacks an N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain [141] and thus has only the ability to hydrolyse the PIP2 substrates located in intracellular membranes rather than the plasma membrane [142]. Analysis on the absence of PLCζ in the sperm of infertile patients who failed to obtain activation of the oocyte following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has supported the significant role for PLCζ in the egg activation process. However, recent studies on oocytes activated using either in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI by sperm derived from Plcz1-null mice have shown the absence of the typical Ca2+ oscillatory pattern required for oocyte activation. Nevertheless, a small number of zygotes fertilized by the sperm genetically lacking PLCζ were able to develop to blastocyst, and to produce live offspring [143]. In another study, it has been found that Plcz1 KO mice failed to induce Ca2+ changes following ICSI, but still elicited a Ca2+ increase following IVF. The altered pattern of Ca2+ release suppressed embryonic development, probably due to the failure of proper oocyte activation or to the polyspermy induced by the absence of adequate Ca2+-linked block mechanisms against the entry of supernumerary sperm [144]. These results suggest that the existence and a role of a PLCζ-independent Ca2+ release mechanism(s) at the oocyte surface are yet to be understood in mammalian oocytes, and raise some concerns in that, despite the essential role of PLCζ in inducing Ca2+ oscillations to ensure monospermic fertilization in mice, the ICSI protocol bypasses what normally occurs at the oocyte cortex following sperm-egg fusion. In this regard, it is noteworthy that the cortices of mouse and ascidians oocytes are highly reactive and structurally organized to facilitate the initiation of Ca2+ oscillations. This has been demonstrated by the visualization of the Ca2+ signal that originates from the periphery of these oocytes after ICSI and then propagates across the cytoplasm [145]. In line with a role of a cortical Ca2+ release in the regulation of a normal oscillatory Ca2+ response, the Ca2+ imaging analysis of intact Ciona intestinalis ascidian oocytes (with chorion and accessory cells attached) shows a CF, resulting from Ca2+ influx, which precedes the Ca2+ oscillations that is usually undetected if the chorion and neighbouring cells are removed prior to fertilization [146].

In line with a role of Ca2+ influx in the initiation of the sperm-induced Ca2+ signals and polar body emission, recent studies on ZP-free mammalian oocytes have shown that, STIM and Orai-linked store-operated Ca2+ entry mechanism is not required to sustain the persistent sperm-induced Ca2+ oscillations [147]. However, the mechanosensitive calcium and magnesium –permeable transient receptor melastatin 7 (TRPM7), and the CaV3.2 T-type channels have been identified as key regulators of Ca2+ influx following fertilization of mouse oocytes [148]. These results suggest that the amount and pattern of the Ca2+ entry via mechanosensitive activation of TRP-type cation channels during fertilization of mammalian oocytes may be heavily dependent on the structural integrity of the egg and appropriate tension controls by the cortical actin cytoskeleton [149, 150].

Interestingly, in Drosophila, it has recently been reported that an intracellular Ca2+ increase following egg activation, which is independent of fertilization but triggered by mechanical pressure in the female reproductive tract, is initiated by entry of extracellular Ca2+. This cortical Ca2+ increase starts at one pole of the egg and initiates the Ca2+ wave that propagates to the opposite one. The initial Ca2+ influx is mediated by the opening of mechanosensitive ion channels indicating a conserved mechanism of calcium signaling in egg activation between protostome (Drosophila) and deuterostome (mouse) [151]. Furthermore, a relationship between changes in the actin cytoskeleton and the Ca2+ increase at egg activation has been demonstrated by showing that reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton that covers the cortex of the mature eggs is required for the Ca2+ wave upon egg activation [152].

As to the clinical applications, Ca2+-ionophore treatment, which is currently used to restore the lack of normal sperm-induced Ca2+ response in human oocytes [153, 154], is among the methods being used for assisted oocyte activation in ICSI. However, there are presently no data reporting that its application induces the Ca2+ oscillations that are critical for successful oocyte activation and the high quality blastocyst formation [155, 156]. The Ca2+-ionophore, which elicits a single Ca2+ increase, thus not mimicking the Ca2+ oscillation at natural fertilization [157], may still lead to proteolysis of cyclin B and to a reduction in the CDK1 activity. However, the amount of Ca2+ released may not ensure that these events occur and persist. In human oocytes, about 10 to 20 Ca2+ transients occurring at intervals of 30–60 min are the physiological pattern associated with successful development. The oscillatory pattern (amplitude and frequencies) of Ca2+ increases appear to have no effects on early cleavages, implantation, and post-implantation development, but foetal morphology [158] and weight variations in offspring have been reported to be affected by abnormal Ca2+ signals [159]. This, together with the notion that Ca2+ ionophores can induce disintegration of the cytoplasm with prolonged exposure and severe structural modifications of the egg cortex in several species [132, 135, 160, 161], raise concerns about their use in clinical IVF.

The actin cytoskeleton in the Ca2+ signaling pathways at fertilization in echinoderms

Sea urchin gametes have been widely used to study the role of Ca2+ signaling pathways in the fertilization process and development. These eggs have completed the meiotic cycle and await the sperm to activate their developmental program. Microinjection of Ca2+ dyes into the cytoplasm of intact unfertilized eggs allows the visualization of the sperm-induced Ca2+ increase, which occurs in the form of a subitaneous release of Ca2+ at the periphery of the egg [130, 162]. This is the result of the opening of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels following depolarization of the egg plasma membrane. A Ca2+ wave follows that starts at the sperm-egg interaction site and propagates to the opposite pole. The role of a Ca2+ influx from external seawater [163] has been neglected for decades as the eggs could be activated in seawater containing low Ca2+ [164], or even in Ca2+ free seawater by acrosome-reacted sperm [134]. Investigations aimed at understanding how fertilization activates Ca2+ release in echinoderm eggs have pointed to the exclusive role of IP3 as the messenger that initiates the increase and spreading of Ca2+. This possibility emerged from experiments in which the measurement of phosphoinositide turnover and IP3 generation were found to coincide with the sperm-elicited Ca2+ wave [87], and by the finding of the blockade of the Ca2+ increase by chemical inhibitors of PLC [165, 166]. Additionally, when PLC activation was blocked, the sperm-induced Ca2+ wave was found to be altered [167, 168]. However, the IP3R antagonist heparin was found to abolish the sperm-induced Ca2+ wave only when it was co-injected with antagonists of ryanodine receptors (RyRs), while a massive amount of Ca2+ was mobilized by the microinjection of ryanodine and cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPr). These Ca2+ signals regard only the Ca2+ wave taking place at fertilization, and not the initial cortical Ca2+ influx. They were nevertheless used to propose an exclusive coupling mechanism between IP3 and RyRs in shaping the Ca2+ signaling at fertilization of sea urchin eggs [169, 170]. However, the finding that cADPr and its upstream modulator cGMP were increased prior to the generation of the Ca2+ transient cast doubt on the notion that IP3 alone initiates Ca2+ release at fertilization [171]. Additional studies on sea urchin eggs have shown that a third Ca2+-linked second messenger, NAADP, mobilizes Ca2+ from stores localized in acidic vesicles in the cytoplasm of intact eggs, which were insensitive to IP3 and cADPr [172]. It was later hypothesized that the receptor of NAADP was the two-pore channel (TPC), a member of the superfamily of voltage gated channels located in endolysosomal structures [173].

In starfish, the global photo-activation of caged NAADP pre-injected into the cytoplasm of oocytes and eggs elicited a Ca2+ increase from Ca2+ stores confined to the cortex, which then spread to the cell centre. However, the NAADP-induced Ca2+ increase was inhibited when the uncaging was performed in Ca2+-free seawater [174]. Electrophysiological studies then provided evidence that NAADP targeted a Ca2+ permeable ion channels on the plasma membrane. NAADP was shown to trigger plasma membrane depolarization and was thus suggested to initiate sperm-induced Ca2+ influx that produced the cortical Ca2+ influx [62]. Interestingly, the NAADP-triggered Ca2+ influx was shown to be dependent on the integrity of the cortical actin cytoskeleton, as judged by the modulation of Ca2+ currents by actin drugs [175]. The possible involvement of acidic vesicles in eliciting the NAADP-induced Ca2+ entry in starfish oocytes, as suggested for sea urchin eggs, was assessed pharmacologically using drugs known to disrupt acidic compartments. However, the treatment failed to inhibit the NAADP-induced plasma membrane depolarization [176]. Recently, knockdown of all three TPC channel isoforms expressed in the starfish Patiria miniata showed that Ca2+ signals at fertilization are only slightly altered, raising doubts about the contribution of these channels to the initiation of the Ca2+ response at fertilization [177].

Starfish gametes have greatly contributed to the understanding of the signaling pathways leading to the intracellular Ca2+ elevation following fertilization. A normal CF (shorter than that elicited in sea urchin eggs) and the Ca2+ wave occur when the sperm fertilizes the maturing starfish oocytes after GVBD and before the extrusion of the first polar body [60, 177]. The IP3-dependent nature of the sperm-induced intracellular Ca2+ wave was demonstrated by experiments in which the microinjection of the SH2 domain of PLCγ delayed the initiation of the Ca2+ wave, leaving the CF unaffected [20, 168]. However, microinjection of heparin into a fertilizable starfish (A. aranciacus) egg completely abolished CF, in addition to lowering the amplitude of the multiple, but abortive, intracellular Ca2+ waves that resulted from polyspermic egg [104]. It was later shown that this abnormal fertilization response was the consequence of the alteration of the structural organization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton [104]. The F-actin-linked morphological changes of the egg cortex induced by heparin favoured polyspermic fertilization and inhibited CG exocytosis not only at fertilization, but also in response to the Ca2+ releases triggered by uncaging of IP3 and cADPr [80, 104]. Thus, at variance with previous reports that cytoplasmic Ca2+ [178] is sufficient for CG exocytosis [179], our results have shown that the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton of the starfish egg cortex is also essential for successful CG exocytosis. In line with this, it has been recently found in mouse eggs that the clearance of the cortical actomyosin layer during CG exocytosis is necessary for the access of the CG to the plasma membrane [180].

A recent investigation by our group on the effects of ageing on cellular and molecular events taking place in fertilized eggs of A. aranciacus (starfish) showed that a prolonged 1-MA-induced maturation (6 h instead of 70 min, overripe eggs) of freshly collected immature oocytes promoted pathological polyspermy at fertilization [12]. The state of the cortical and cytoplasmic F-actin in the GV stage oocytes, mature fertilizable eggs, and overripe eggs are shown in the confocal microscopic images (Fig. 5). The network of actin filaments widely distributed in the cytoplasm of immature oocytes (Fig. 5a) is no longer visible after the treatment with 1-MA for 70 min, while their presence is now prominent near the plasma membrane with the actin fibres oriented perpendicular to the egg surface (Fig. 5b). However, this orderly arrangement of the actin filaments subjacent to the plasma membrane, which is characteristic to mature eggs (Fig. 5b), is now lost in overripe eggs (Fig. 5c), indicating a dramatic reorganization of the cortical F-actin during egg ageing. The structural organization of the cortical F-actin at different maturation stages and its response to fertilizing sperm determines the pattern of the Ca2+ increases at fertilization. Indeed, the GV stage oocytes respond to insemination by eliciting multiple Ca2+ waves (arrowheads) that precede the occurrence of the CF (Fig. 5a’). The Ca2+ waves then converge to the centre of the oocyte. By contrast, eggs treated for 70 min with 1-MA, which represents the optimum period to achieve monospermic fertilization, respond to fertilizing sperm by forming a CF followed by a single Ca2+ wave (arrowhead) running from the sperm-egg interaction site to the opposite pole (Fig. 5b′). In overripe eggs, the CF is followed by multiple Ca2+ waves (arrowheads) as a result of polyspermic fertilization (Fig. 5c′).

Fig. 5

F-actin staining in living A. aranciacus oocytes at different maturation stages and calcium responses upon insemination. a Confocal image of the F-actin in an immature oocyte (GV-stage). A network of actin filaments is visible in the cytoplasm of oocytes not treated with 1-MA. b Reorganization of F-actin following 1-MA stimulation: The cytoplasmic F-actin network seen in a is no longer visible. At this stage of maturation (70 min of hormonal treatment) the actin fibers are perpendicular to the egg surface. c Alteration of the cortical actin in an overripe egg (1-MA treatment for 6 h) as evidenced by the irregular layer of the cortical F-actin as compared to that in b. Note the absence of the actin fibres perpendicularly oriented at the egg surface. a’ Ca2+ response of an immature polyspermic oocyte upon insemination. Two Ca2+ waves (arrowheads) that converge to the centre of the oocyte precede the release of Ca2+ in the oocyte cortex (CF, arrow). b’ Egg treated with 1-MA for 70 min experience a normal Ca2+ response with a CF (arrow) which precedes the single Ca2+ wave. c′ Two Ca2+ waves (arrowheads) as a result of polyspermic fertilization in overripe eggs inseminated 6 h after hormonal treatment

Our and previous findings that overripe eggs are penetrated by numerous spermatozoa at fertilization despite the elevation of the FE [10,11,12] have suggested that some mechanisms other than CG exocytosis may finely control the entry of only one sperm. One explanation for multiple sperm penetration could be morphological modifications of the VL (Fig. 2e) on the surface of overripe eggs, which may allow interactions of multiple sperm with the egg plasma membrane through the numerous openings in the egg envelope. The concomitant alteration of the cortical F-actin structure in the overripe eggs may impair its rapid changes at fertilization, which would otherwise prevent the binding and penetration of additional spermatozoa.

In mammals, aged eggs also show cellular and molecular changes that compromise the fertilization response and optimal development [42]. As with overripe eggs of starfish, the structural modification initiates at the ZP [25], which becomes harder and requires longer time for enzymatic digestion [181]. The structural abnormalities of the egg cortex include altered topography of the plasma membrane which is not homogenously covered by microvilli [182] and thus may be responsible for the abnormal fertilization response [42].

The roles played by the egg cortical actin cytoskeleton in regulating a normal fertilization reaction have also been demonstrated in sea urchin. Analysis of the effects of actin drugs promoting F-actin depolymerization or stabilization on the fertilization reaction of P. lividus eggs has shown that modification of actin structure and dynamics led to alterations of the sperm-induced Ca2+ release, pattern of sperm entry, and the extent of the FE elevation [49]. The characteristic rearrangement of actin fibers in the cortex of monospermic eggs and their concerted translocation towards the center of the zygotes [183] were also inhibited when P. lividus eggs were fertilized in low sodium media. As a result, these monospermic zygotes underwent aberrant cleavages [125]. Seawater salinity changes also alter cortical actin dynamics and the structure of the cytoplasm and organelles , which lead to alteration of the sperm-induced Ca2+ signals and reduced success rate of development (Limatola N, Chun JT, Santella L. Effects of salinity and pH of seawater on the reproduction of Paracentrotus lividus, submitted). Similarly, treatment of sea urchin eggs with agents that disrupt, relocate, or fuse cortical vesicles and CG also alter microvillar morphology and density, and these eggs exhibit altered Ca2+ kinetics at fertilization in its rise and fall [184]. The crucial role played by actin-dependent microvilli morphology and the actin-associated cortical acidic vesicles in generating normal fertilization reactions has been further provided in the eggs whose cortical vesicles are dislodged from the egg plasma membrane by physical force [184,185,186]. Furthermore, our findings in starfish on the functional importance of the changes in actin filament organization of the unfertilized egg cortex in regulating monospermic fertilization have been extended to sea urchin as well [49]. Very recently, we found that nicotine induces polyspermic fertilization through a mechanism that is independent of the cholinergic pathways but is mediated by changes in the egg cortical F-actin meshwork and its altered polymerization dynamics [187].

Within a few minutes after fertilization, the cortical actin cytoskeleton visibly reorganized at the egg surface from the point of sperm entry toward the entire egg surface [188, 189]. The cortical actin polymerization coincides with an efflux of acid into the surrounding seawater [190] and with the elongation of microvilli into the perivitelline space [191, 192]. Actin bundle formation and full elongation of microvilli require Ca2+ elevation and the action of Ca2+-sensitive actin binding proteins [193,194,195,196]. Furthermore, the normal equidistant elevation of the FE depends on the formation of actin-containing spikes protruding from the egg surface into the perivitelline space [197]. Cortical actin reorganization following fertilization also includes detachment and translocation of actin filaments from the egg surface towards the centre of the zygote, which is a prerequisite for a normal cleavage [125, 135, 183].

Actin-based morphology of the fertilization cone in normal and pathological eggs

The interaction between the fertilizing sperm and sea urchin eggs occurs at the tip of microvilli containing bundles of actin filaments which may participate in sperm–egg binding and fusion [198]. A large increase in the mass of actin filaments occurs at the site of sperm entry, forming the fertilization cone. This cytoplasmic protrusion has been observed by TEM [193] and in living eggs by fluorescent actin or phalloidin [183, 189]. In sea urchin and starfish, the fertilization cone made by actin filaments engulfs and incorporates the sperm into the eggs [199, 200]. Fertilization of GV stage starfish and sea urchin oocytes leads to formation of multiple fertilization cones (polyspermic fertilization) and fail to produce a FE, which is well visible in the light microscope [11, 193]. Their fertilization cones exhibit abnormal length presumably due to the different actin organization of the cortex, as judged by the comparison with the mature eggs that are normally monospermic at fertilization. The SEM images (Fig. 2) show that the fertilization cone in the polyspermic immature oocytes and overripe eggs consist of a larger number of elongated microvilli protruding from the physiological, and pathological, porous structure of the VL, respectively. The microvillar structure (finger-like protrusions) of the fertilization cones following polyspermic fertilization (Fig. 2b) is dramatically different from the cytoplasmic protrusion emanating through the pore of the FE during monospermic fertilization (Fig. 2d). Differences in the shape of the fertilization cones in immature oocytes, mature eggs, and overripe eggs are also evident when F-actin is stained and viewed with confocal microscopy. As shown in Fig. 6a, in polyspermic GV stage oocytes multiple fertilization cones containing actin filaments are formed. Once the spermatozoa are incorporated into the oocytes, they tend to remain localized in their cortical regions (Fig. 6a’, arrowhead). By contrast, a mature monospermic egg of starfish forms one single fertilization cone on the egg surface upon insemination (Fig. 6b and b’), the morphology of which is different from the ones produced by immature oocytes (Fig. 6a). The cytoplasmic protrusions of actin bundles previously shown in confocal and epifluorescence images [12, 197] appear to traverse the FE [104, 105] and ‘grab’ the head of the fertilizing sperm for its incorporation (Fig. 2d). The confocal image of F-actin at the cortex of a mature egg following monospermic fertilization shows the cytoplasmic translocation of well-defined actin filaments (Fig. 6b) that start to migrate to the centre of the egg. Figure 6b’ shows the elevation of the FE as well as the fertilization cone that incorporates the incoming sperm (arrowhead). The alteration of the cortical actin in eggs fertilized 6 h after hormonal treatment (overripe eggs) compromises the fertilization response (Fig. 6c). In addition to the formation of a fertilization cone that is morphologically different from that of monospermic eggs, translocation of actin filaments from the egg surface to the centre fails to occur presumably because actin fibres are disarrayed in the cortex of unfertilized eggs (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 6

Confocal images of the cortical actin cytoskeleton in starfish oocytes fertilized at different meiotic stages. Immature oocytes, mature eggs and overripe eggs of A. aranciacus were microinjected with Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin. a F-actin staining of the fertilization cones in a polyspermic immature oocyte. Note the large number of actin bundles composing the fertilization cones that will incorporate the sperm in the absence of a FE elevation shown in the overlay image in a’. b A mature monospermic egg fertilized in its optimal stage of maturation (70 min 1-MA treatment) that shows a fertilization cone. Note the initiation of the centripetal translocation of individual actin fibres at the subplasmalemmal zone and the elevation of the FE in the overlay image in b′ as a result of the CG exocytosis. c Reorganization of the F-actin in an overripe egg fertilized after 6 h hormonal treatment. Note that the centripetal translocation seen in fertilized mature eggs is absent in overripe eggs upon insemination. c′) Image overlay showing the fertilization envelope (FE) elevation and incorporation of sperm in the egg (arrowhead). Multiple spermatozoa enter even in the presence of normal elevation of FE

At variance with echinoderm eggs, the involvement of actin filaments for sperm incorporation in mammalian fertilization is controversial. This is probably due to the fact that different actin drugs have been used to depolymerize or stabilize the cortical actin in eggs before fertilization. These controversial results may be attributable to the specific and diverse mechanisms of action of actin drugs, which complicates comparison of their effects in perturbing the actin polymerization step [56].

Conclusion and perspectives

Dynamic remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton is essential not only for the control of cell shape but also for the regulation of important cellular processes. An increasing body of evidence suggests that the structural organization of the actin cytoskeleton and its physical changes induced by external signals dynamically regulate a large number of events occurring during oocyte meiotic maturation and fertilization. During maturation, the acquisition of competence of the oocyte to be successfully fertilized is in major part controlled by the actin filaments of the egg cortex. Concerted reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton appears to regulate the membrane potential and the alignment of CG beneath the plasma membrane to facilitate the responses at egg activation: proper Ca2+ response to fertilizing sperm, CG exocytosis, as well as monospermic penetration, spindle formation, and polar bodies extrusions. Results on overripe starfish eggs that are fertilized in a time window different from their optimal have shown that the deterioration of the cells induces dramatic morphological alterations of the surface and cortex that negatively impact the fertilization process. The same changes appear to happen in mammalian oocyte ageing. In view of the difficulties of gamete availability and accessibility as well as the ethical issues involved, extensive studies on the reproductive biology of human oocytes has met with obstacles. Thus, animal models of starfish and sea urchin have invaluable practical merits.

In this review, we emphasize that one of the fundamental reactions of gametes at fertilization is concerted changes of the actin filaments in both gametes. For eggs, the cortical reaction is compromised when the egg is not healthy, thus a successful cortical reaction could be an indicator of the “quality” of the eggs, and the latter is mainly determined by the proper regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Thus, technical aspects of ART to preserve functionality of the actin cytoskeleton in the human eggs would be also important. The usage of marine eggs as experimental systems to study oocyte maturation and fertilization is also advantageous in that perspective.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. 1.

    Stricker SA. Comparative biology of calcium signaling during fertilization and egg activation in animals. Dev Biol. 1999;211:157–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chiba K. Evolution of the acquisition of fertilization competence and polyspermy blocks during meiotic maturation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:808–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Deguchi R, Takeda N, Stricker SA. Calcium signals and oocyte maturation in marine invertebrates. Int J Dev Biol. 2015;59:271–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stricker SA. Marine nemertean worms for studies of oocyte maturation and aging. In: marine organisms as model systems in biology and medicine. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2018;65:3–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Just EE. The Biology of the Cell Surface. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son & Co., Inc; 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kanatani H, Shirai H, Nakanishi K, Kurokawa T. Isolation and indentification on meiosis inducing substance in starfish Asterias amurensis. Nature. 1969;221:273–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Meijer L, Guerrier P. Maturation and fertilization in starfish oocytes. Int Rev Cytol. 1984;86:129–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chambers R. The mechanism of the entrance of sperm into the starfish egg. J Gen Physiol. 1923;5:821–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Clark JM. An experimental study of polyspermy. Biol Bull. 1936;70:361–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fujimori T, Hirai S. Differences in starfish oocyte susceptibility to polyspermy during the course of maturation. Biol Bull. 1979;157:249–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Santella L, Limatola N, Chun JT. Actin cytoskeleton and fertilization in starfish eggs. In: Sawada H, Inuoe N, Iwano M, editors. editors Sexual reproduction in animals and plants Part II. Tokyo: Springer Open; 2014. p. 141–55.

  12. 12.

    Limatola N, Vasilev F, Chun JT, Santella L. Altered actin cytoskeleton in ageing eggs of starfish affects fertilization process. Exp Cell Res. 2019;381:179–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xie X, Percipalle P. An actin-based nucleoskeleton involved in gene regulation and genome organization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;506:378–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee SH, Dominguez R. Regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics in cells. Mol Cells. 2010;29:311–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lange K. Microvillar Ca++ signaling: a new view of an old problem. J Cell Physiol. 1999;180:19–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lange K. Fundamental role of microvilli in the main functions of differentiated cells: outline of an universal regulating and signaling system at the cell periphery. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:896–927.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Janmey PA, Bucki R, Radhakrishnan R. Regulation of actin assembly by PI (4,5) P2 and other inositol phospholipids: an update on possible mechanisms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;506:307–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lim D, Lange K, Santella L. Activation of oocytes by latrunculin a. FASEB J. 2002;16:1050–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Moccia F. Latrunculin A depolarizes starfish oocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007;148:845–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vasilev F, Limatola N, Park DR, Kim UH, Santella L, Chun JT. Disassembly of subplasmalemmal actin filaments induces cytosolic Ca2+ increases in Astropecten aranciacus eggs. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48:2011–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lu Y, Bonte D, Ferrer-Buitrago M, Popovic M, Neupane J, Van der Jeught M, Leybaert L, De Sutter P, Heindryckx B. Culture conditions affect Ca2+ release in artificially activated mouse and human oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018;30:991–1001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hassold TJ, Jacobs PA. Trisomy in man. Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:69–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu XJ. Targeting oocyte maturation to improve fertility in older women. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363:57–68.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tarín JJ, García-Pérez MA, Cano A. Note of clarification: potential risks to offspring of intrauterine exposure to maternal age-related obstetric complications. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;29:1653.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Díaz H, Esponda P. Postovulatory ageing induces structural changes in the mouse zona pellucida. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 2004;36:211–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:573–85.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schroeder TE. Microfilament-mediated surface change in starfish oocytes in response to 1-methyladenine: implications for identifying the pathway and receptor sites for maturation-inducing hormones. J Cell Biol. 1981;90:362–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schroeder TE, Stricker SA. Morphological changes during maturation of starfish oocytes: surface ultrastructure and cortical actin. Dev Biol. 1983;98:373–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Santella L, Limatola N, Vasilev F, Chun JT. Maturation and fertilization of echinoderm eggs: role of actin cytoskeleton dynamics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;506:361–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Moreau M, Cheval J. Electrical properties of the starfish oocyte membranes. J Physiol Paris. 1976;72:293–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Miyazaki SI, Ohmori H, Sasaki S. Potassium rectifications of the starfish oocyte membrane and their changes during oocyte maturation. J Physiol. 1975;246:55–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Miyazaki S, Hirai S. Fast polyspermy block and activation potential. Correlated changes during oocyte maturation of a starfish. Dev Biol. 1979;70:327–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dale B, de Santis A, Hoshi M. Membrane response to 1-methyladenine requires the presence of the nucleus. Nature. 1979;282:89–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dale B, De Santis A. Maturation and fertilization of the sea urchin oocyte: an electrophysiological study. Dev Biol. 1981;85:474–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jaffe LA. Fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs is electrically mediated. Nature. 1976;261:68–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Miyazaki S, Igusa Y. Fertilization potential in golden hamster eggs consists of recurring hyperpolarizations. Nature. 1981;290:702–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jaffe LA, Sharp AP, Wolf DP. Absence of an electrical polyspermy block in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1983;96:317–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ducibella T. The cortical reaction and development of activation competence in mammalian oocytes. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2:29–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wassarman PM, Litscher ES. The mouse Egg’s Zona Pellucida. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2018;130:331–56.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Díaz H, Esponda P. Ageing-induced changes in the cortical granules of mouse eggs. Zygote. 2004a;12:95–103.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    McAvey BA, Wortzman GB, Williams CJ, Evans JP. Involvement of calcium signaling and the actin cytoskeleton in the membrane block to polyspermy in mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1342–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wortzman GB, Evans JP. Membrane and cortical abnormalities in post-ovulatory aged eggs: analysis of fertilizability and establishment of the membrane block to polyspermy. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11:1–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Longo FJ. Changes in the zonae pellucidae and plasmalemmae of aging mouse eggs. Biol Reprod. 1981;25:399–411.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Longo FJ, Woerner M, Chiba K, Hoshi M. Cortical changes in starfish (Asterina pectinifera) oocytes during 1-methyladenine-induced maturation and fertilisation/activation. Zygote. 1995;3:225–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Santella L, De Riso L, Gragnaniello G, Kyozuka K. Cortical granule translocation during maturation of starfish oocytes requires cytoskeletal rearrangement triggered by InsP3-mediated Ca2+ release. Exp Cell Res. 1999;248:567–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wessel GM, Conner SD, Berg L. Cortical granule translocation is microfilament mediated and linked to meiotic maturation in the sea urchin oocyte. Development. 2002;129:4315–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chiba K, Hoshi M. Three phases of cortical maturation during meiosis reinitiation in starfish oocytes. Develop Growth Differ. 1989;31:447–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Schuel H. The prevention of polyspermic fertilization in sea urchins. Biol Bull. 1984;167:271–309.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chun JT, Limatola N, Vasilev F, Santella L. Early events of fertilization in sea urchin eggs are sensitive to actin-binding organic molecules. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450:1166–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Shôji Y, Hamaguchi MS, Hiramoto Y. Mechanical properties of the endoplasm in starfish oocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1978;117:79–87.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nemoto S, Yoneda M, Uemura I. Marked decrease in the rigidity of starfish induced by 1-methyladenine. Develop Growth Differ. 1980;22:315–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hamaguchi Y, Numata TK, Satoh S. Quantitative analysis of cortical actin filaments during polar body formation in starfish oocytes. Cell Struct Funct. 2007;32:29–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Heil-Chapdelaine RA, Otto JJ. Characterization of changes in F-actin during maturation of starfish oocytes. Dev Biol. 1996;177:204–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Longo FJ, Chen DY. Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev Biol. 1985;107:382–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Albertini DF, Barrett SL. The developmental origins of mammalian oocyte polarity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:599–606.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sun QY, Schatten H. Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. Reproduction. 2006;131:193–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kloc M, Ghobrial RM, Borsuk E, Kubiak JZ. Polarity and asymmetry during mouse oogenesis and oocyte maturation. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2012;55:23–44.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Namgoong S, Kim NH. Roles of actin binding proteins in mammalian oocyte maturation and beyond. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:1830–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Miyazaki A, Kamitsubo E, Nemoto SI. Premeiotic aster as a device to anchor the germinal vesicle to the cell surface of the presumptive animal pole in starfish oocytes. Dev Biol. 2000;218:161–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Santella L, Limatola N, Chun JT. Calcium and actin in the saga of awakening oocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460:104–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Stricker SA, Schatten G. The cytoskeleton and nuclear disassembly during germinal vesicle breakdown in starfish oocytes. Develop Growth Differ. 1991;33:163–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lim D, Kyozuka K, Gragnaniello G, Carafoli E, Santella L. NAADP+ initiates the Ca2+ response during fertilization of starfish oocytes. FASEB J. 2001;15:2257–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lénárt P, Bacher CP, Daigle N, Hand AR, Eils R, Terasaki M, Ellenberg J. A contractile nuclear actin network drives chromosome congression in oocytes. Nature. 2005;436:812–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Longo FJ. Actin-plasma membrane associations in mouse eggs and oocytes. J Exp Zool. 1987;243:299–309.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Shida H, Shida M. Inhibitory effect of α-(1→6)-heterogalactan on oocyte maturation of starfish induced by 1-methyladenine. Nature. 1976;263:77–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Schuetz AW. Cytoplasmic activation of starfish oocytes by sperm and divalent ionophore A-23187. J Cell Biol. 1975;66:86–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kanatani H, Hiramoto Y. Site of action of 1-methyladenine in inducing oocyte maturation in starfish. Exp Cell Res. 1970;61:280–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ward GE, Kirschner MW. Identification of cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation sites on nuclear Lamin C. Cell. 1990;61:561–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kishimoto T. MPF-based meiotic cell cycle control: half a century of lessons from starfish oocytes. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2018;94:180–203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Masui Y, Markert CL. Cytoplasmic control of nuclear behavior during meiotic maturation of frog oocytes. J Exp Zool. 1971;177:129–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Masui Y. From oocyte maturation to the in vitro cell cycle: the history of discoveries of maturation-promoting factor (MPF) and cytostatic factor (CSF). Differentiation. 2001;69:1–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Norbury C, Nurse P. Controls of cell proliferation in yeast and animals. Ciba Found Symp Proto-Oncogenes in Cell Development. 1990;150:168–77; discussion p. 177–183.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Prigent C, Hunt T. Oocyte maturation and cell cycle control: a farewell symposium for Pr Marcel Dorée. Biol Cell. 2004;96:181–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Moreau M, Guerrier P, Doree M, Ashley CC. Hormone-induced release of intracellular Ca2+ triggers meiosis in starfish oocytes. Nature. 1978;272:251–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Witchel HJ, Steinhardt RA. 1-Methyladenine can consistently induce a fura-detectable transient calcium increase which is neither necessary nor sufficient for maturation in oocytes of the starfish Asterina miniata. Dev Biol. 1990;141:393–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Santella L. The role of calcium in the cell cycle: facts and hypotheses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;244:317–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Santella L, Kyozuka K. Reinitiation of meiosis in starfish oocytes requires an increase in nuclear Ca2+. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;203:674–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Santella L, De Riso L, Gragnaniello G, Kyozuka K. Separate activation of the cytoplasmic and nuclear calcium pools in maturing starfish oocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;252:1–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Santella L, Kyozuka K. Association of calmodulin with nuclear structures in starfish oocytes and its role in the resumption of meiosis. Eur J Biochem. 1997;246:602–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Kyozuka K, Chun JT, Puppo A, Gragnaniello G, Garante E, Santella L. Actin cytoskeleton modulates calcium signaling during maturation of starfish oocytes. Dev Biol. 2008;320:426–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kyozuka K, Chun JT, Puppo A, Gragnaniello G, Garante E, Santella L. Guanine nucleotides in the meiotic maturation of starfish oocytes: regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and of Ca (2+) signaling. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6296.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Chiba K, Kado RT, Jaffe LA. Development of calcium release mechanisms during starfish oocyte maturation. Dev Biol. 1990;140:300–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Jaffe LA, Terasaki M. Structural changes in the endoplasmic reticulum of starfish oocytes during meiotic maturation and fertilization. Dev Biol. 1994;164:579–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Ookata K, Hisanaga S, Okano T, Tachibana K, Kishimoto T. Relocation and distinct subcellular localization of p34cdc2-cyclin B complex at meiosis reinitiation in starfish oocytes. EMBO J. 1992;11:1763–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lim D, Ercolano E, Kyozuka K, Nusco GA, Moccia F, Lange K, Santella L. The M-phase-promoting factor modulates the sensitivity of the Ca2+ stores to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate via the actin cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:42505–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Nusco GA, Chun JT, Ercolano E, Lim D, Gragnaniello G, Kyozuka K, Santella L. Modulation of calcium signalling by the actin-binding protein cofilin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;348:109–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Ciapa B, Borg B, Whitaker M. Polyphosphoinositide metabolism during the fertilization wave in sea urchin eggs. Development. 1992;115:187–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Limatola N, Chun JT, Kyozuka K, Santella L. Novel Ca2+ increases in the maturing oocytes of starfish during the germinal vesicle breakdown. Cell Calcium. 2015;58:500–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    FitzHarris G, Marangos P, Carroll J. Changes in endoplasmic reticulum structure during mouse oocyte maturation are controlled by the cytoskeleton and cytoplasmic dynein. Dev Biol. 2007;305:133–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ferrer-Vaquer A, Barragán M, Rodríguez A, Vassena R. Altered cytoplasmic maturation in rescued in vitro matured oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1095–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Mann JS, Lowther KM, Mehlmann LM. Reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum and development of Ca2+ release mechanisms during meiotic maturation of human oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2010;83:578–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Epel D. Mechanisms of activation of sperm and egg during fertilization of sea urchin gametes. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1978;12:185–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Santella L, Vasilev F, Chun JT. Fertilization in echinoderms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425:588–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Ramos I, Wessel GM. Calcium pathway machinery at fertilization in echinoderms. Cell Calcium. 2013;53:16–23.

  95. 95.

    Dan JC, Kitahara A, Kohri T. Studies on the acrosome. II. Acrosome reaction in starfish spermatozoa. Biol Bull. 1954;107:203–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Vilela-Silva AC, Hirohashi N, Mourão PA. The structure of sulfated polysaccharides ensures a carbohydrate-based mechanism for species recognition during sea urchin fertilization. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52:551–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Vacquier VD. The quest for the sea urchin egg receptor for sperm. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425:583–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Dan JC. Studies on the acrosome. III. Effect of calcium deficiency. Biol Bull. 1954;107:335–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Decker GL, Joseph DB, Lennarz WJ. A study of factors involved in induction of the acrosomal reaction in sperm of the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata. Dev Biol. 1976;53:115–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Nishigaki T, José O, González-Cota AL, Romero F, Treviño CL, Darszon A. Intracellular pH in sperm physiology. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450:1149–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Chávez JC, De la Vega-Beltrán JL, José O, Torres P, Nishigaki T, Treviño CL, Darszon A. Acrosomal alkalization triggers Ca2+ release and acrosome reaction in mammalian spermatozoa. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:4735–47.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Tilney LG, Kiehart DP, Sardet C, Tilney M. Polymerization of actin. IV. Role of Ca++ and H+ in the assembly of actin and in membrane fusion in the acrosomal reaction of echinoderm sperm. J Cell Biol. 1978;77:536–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Hoshi M, Moriyama H, Matsumoto M. Structure of acrosome reaction-inducing substance in the jelly coat of starfish eggs: a mini review. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425:595–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Puppo A, Chun JT, Gragnaniello G, Garante E, Santella L. Alteration of the cortical actin cytoskeleton deregulates Ca2+ signaling, monospermic fertilization, and sperm entry. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3588.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Santella L, Puppo A, Chun JT. The role of the actin cytoskeleton in calcium signaling in starfish oocytes. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52:571–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Cohen G, Rubinstein S, Gur Y, Breitbart H. Crosstalk between protein kinase a and C regulates phospholipase D and F-actin formation during sperm capacitation. Dev Biol. 2004;267:230–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Finkelstein M, Megnagi B, Ickowicz D, Breitbart H. Regulation of sperm motility by PIP2(4,5) and actin polymerization. Dev Biol. 2013;381:62–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Breitbart H, Finkelstein M. Actin cytoskeleton and sperm function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;506:372–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    O'Toole CM, Arnoult C, Darszon A, Steinhardt RA, Florman HM. Ca (2+) entry through store-operated channels in mouse sperm is initiated by egg ZP3 and drives the acrosome reaction. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:1571–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    La Spina FA, Puga Molina LC, Romarowski A, Vitale AM, Falzone TL, Krapf D, Hirohashi N, Buffone MG. Mouse sperm begin to undergo acrosomal exocytosis in the upper isthmus of the oviduct. Dev Biol. 2016;411:172–82.

  111. 111.

    Gilkey JC, Jaffe LF, Ridgway EB, Reynolds GT. A free calcium wave traverses the activating egg of the medaka, Oryzias latipes. J Cell Biol. 1978;76:448–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Just EE. Initiation of development in Arbacia. Protoplasma. 1928;5:97–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Mazia D. The release of calcium in Arbacia eggs upon fertilization. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1937;10:291–304.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Wilson WL, Heilbrun LV. The protoplasmic cortex in relation to stimulation. Biol Bull. 1952;103:139–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Shapiro BM. The control of oxidant stress at fertilization. Science. 1991;252:533–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Just EE. The fertilization reaction in Echinarachnius parma. I. Cortical response of the egg to insemination. Biol Bull. 1919;36:1–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Steinhardt RA, Lundin L, Mazia D. Bioelectric responses of the echinoderm egg to fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971;68:2426–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Chambers EL. Na is essential for activation of the inseminated sea urchin egg. J Exp Zool. 1976;197:149–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Dale B, De Belice LJ, Taglietti V. Membrane noise and conductance increase during single spermatozoon-egg interactions. Nature. 1978;275:217–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Dale B, Dan-Sohkawa M, De Santis A, Hoshi M. Fertilization of the starfish Astropecten aurantiacus. Exp Cell Res. 1981;132:505–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Jaffe LA. The fast block to polyspermy: new insight into a century-old problem. J Gen Physiol. 2018;150:1233–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Wozniak KL, Carlson AE. Ion channels and signaling pathways used in the fast polyspermy block. Mol Reprod Dev. 201987;87:350–7.

  123. 123.

    Dale B, Monroy A. How is polyspermy prevented? Gamete Res. 1981;4:151–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Dale B. Is the idea of a fast block to polyspermy based on artifact? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450:1159–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Limatola N, Vasilev F, Chun JT, Santella L. Sodium-mediated fast electrical depolarization does not prevent polyspermic fertilization in Paracentrotus lividus eggs. Zygote. 2019a;27:241–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Dale B. New experimental data refuting the idea of a fast electrical block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs. Zygote. 2019;27:193–4.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Santella L. Polyspermy-preventing mechanisms in sea urchin eggs: New developments for an old problem Biochem. Biophys Res Commun. 2019;520:695–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Schatten H, Schatten G, Mazia D, Balczon R, Simerly C. Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:105–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Scheer U. Historical roots of centrosome research: discovery of Boveri’s microscope slides in Würzburg. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1650):20130469.

  130. 130.

    Santella L, Chun JT. Actin, more than just a housekeeping protein at the scene of fertilization. Sci China Life Sci. 2011;54:733–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Shen SS, Buck WR. Sources of calcium in sea urchin eggs during the fertilization response. Dev Biol. 1993;157:157–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Steinhardt RA, Epel D. Activation of sea-urchin eggs by a calcium ionophore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:1915–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Steinhardt RA, Epel D, Carroll EJ Jr, Yanagimachi R. Is calcium ionophore a universal activator for unfertilised eggs? Nature. 1974;252:41–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Takahashi YM, Sugiyama M. Relation between the acrosome reaction and fertilization in the sea urchin: I. fertilization in Ca-free seawater with eggwater-treated spermatozoa. Develop Growth Differ. 1973;15:261–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Vasilev F, Chun JT, Gragnaniello G, Garante E, Santella L. Effects of ionomycin on egg activation and early development in starfish. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39231.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Homer H. The APC/C in female mammalian meiosis I. the cortical reaction and development of activation competence in mammalian oocytes. Reproduction. 2013;146:R61–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Ducibella T, Fissore R. The roles of Ca2+, downstream protein kinases, and oscillatory signaling in regulating fertilization and the activation of development. Dev Biol. 2008;315:257–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Saunders CM, Larman MG, Parrington J, Cox LJ, Royse J, Blayney LM, Swann K, Lai FA. PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca (2+) oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development. 2002;129:3533–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Ducibella T, Huneau D, Angelichio E, Xu Z, Schultz RM, Kopf GS, Fissore R, Madoux S, Ozil JP. Egg-to-embryo transition is driven by differential responses to Ca (2+) oscillation number. Dev Biol. 2002;250:280–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Miyazaki S, Yuzaki M, Nakada K, Shirakawa H, Nakanishi S, Nakade S, Mikoshiba K. Block of Ca2+ wave and Ca2+ oscillation by antibody to the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in fertilized hamster eggs. Science. 1992;257:251–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Nomikos M. Novel signalling mechanism and clinical applications of sperm-specific PLCζ. Biochem Soc Trans. 2015;43:371–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Halet G, Tunwell R, Balla T, Swann K, Carroll J. The dynamics of plasma membrane PtdIns (4,5) P (2) at fertilization of mouse eggs. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:2139–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Hachem A, Godwin J, Ruas M, Lee HC, Ferrer Buitrago M, Ardestani G, Bassett A, Fox S, Navarrete F, de Sutter P, Heindryckx B, Fissore R, Parrington J. PLCζ is the physiological trigger of the Ca2+ oscillations that induce embryogenesis in mammals but conception can occur in its absence. Development. 2017;144:2914–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Nozawa K, Satouh Y, Fujimoto T, Oji A, Ikawa M. Sperm-borne phospholipase C zeta-1 ensures monospermic fertilization in mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Kyozuka K, Deguchi R, Mohri T, Miyazaki S. Injection of sperm extract mimics spatiotemporal dynamics of Ca2+ responses and progression of meiosis at fertilization of ascidian oocytes. Development. 1998;125:4099–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Chun JT, Santella L. Intracellular calcium waves. In: Lennarz WJ, Lane MD, editors. editors Encyclopedia of biological chemistry. Waltham: Academic Press; 2013. p. 640–7.

    Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Bernhardt ML, Padilla-Banks E, Stein P, Zhang Y, Williams CJ. Store-operated Ca2+ entry is not required for fertilization-induced Ca2+ signaling in mouse eggs. Cell Calcium. 2017;65:63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Bernhardt ML, Stein P, Carvacho I, Krapp C, Ardestani G, Mehregan A, Umbach DM, Bartolomei MS, Fissore RA, Williams CJ. TRPM7 and CaV3.2 channels mediate Ca2+ influx required for egg activation at fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E10370–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Otsuguro K, Tang J, Tang Y, Xiao R, Freichel M, Tsvilovskyy V, Ito S, Flockerzi V, Zhu MX, Zholos AV. Isoform-specific inhibition of TRPC4 channel by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:10026–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Xiao E, Chen C, Zhang Y. The mechanosensor of mesenchymal stem cells: mechanosensitive channel or cytoskeleton? Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7:140.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Hu Q, Wolfner M. F. (2019). The Drosophila Trpm channel mediates calcium influx during egg activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:18994–1900.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    York-Andersen AH, Hu Q, Wood BW, Wolfner MF, Weil TT. A calcium-mediated actin redistribution at egg activation in Drosophila. Mol Reprod Dev. 2019.

  153. 153.

    Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S, Javdan Z, Tavalaee M. Artificial oocyte activation in severe teratozoospermia undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2231–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Ebner T, Montag M. Artificial oocyte activation: evidence for clinical readiness. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;32:271–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F, Khani P, Aflatoonian A. Effect of calcium ionophore on unfertilized oocytes after ICSI cycles. Iran J Reprod Med. 2012;10:83–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Vanden Meerschaut F, Nikiforaki D, Heindryckx B, De Sutter P. Assisted oocyte activation following ICSI fertilization failure. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28:560–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Santella L, Dale B. Assisted yes, but where do we draw the line? Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:476–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Ozil JP, Huneau D. Activation of rabbit oocytes: the impact of the Ca2+ signal regime on development. Development. 2001;128:917–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Ozil JP, Banrezes B, Toth S, Pan H, Schultz RM. Ca2+ oscillatory pattern in fertilized mouse eggs affects gene expression and development to term. Dev Biol. 2006;300:534–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Holland ND. Effects of ionophore A23187 on oocytes of Comanthus Japonica. (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Develop Growth Differ. 1980;22:203–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Schalkoff ME, Hart NH. Effects of A23187 upon cortical granule exocytosis in eggs of Brachydanio. Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1986;195:39–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Santella L, Lim D, Moccia F. Calcium and fertilization: the beginning of life. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:400–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Créton R, Jaffe LF. Role of calcium influx during the latent period in sea urchin fertilization. Develop Growth Differ. 1995;37:703–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Schmidt T, Patton C, Epel D. Is there a role for the Ca2+ influx during fertilization of the sea urchin egg? Dev Biol. 1982;90:284–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Mohri T, Ivonnet PI, Chambers EL. Effect on sperm-induced activation current and increase of cytosolic Ca2+ by agents that modify the mobilization of [Ca2+]i. I. Heparin and pentosan polysulfate. Dev Biol. 1995;172:139–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Lee SJ, Shen SS. The calcium transient in sea urchin eggs during fertilization requires the production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Dev Biol. 1998;193:195–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Runft LL, Jaffe LA, Mehlmann LM. Egg activation at fertilization: where it all begins. Dev Biol. 2002;245:237–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Wiseman E, Bates L, Dubé A, Carroll DJ. Starfish as model system for analysing signal transduction during fertilization. In: marine organisms as model systems in biology and medicine. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2018;65:49–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Galione A, McDougall A, Busa WB, Willmott N, Gillot I, Whitaker M. Redundant mechanisms of calcium-induced calcium release underlying calcium waves during fertilization of sea urchin eggs. Science. 1993;261:348–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Lee HC, Aarhus R, Walseth TF. Calcium mobilization by dual receptors during fertilization of sea urchin eggs. Science. 1993;261:352–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Kuroda R, Kontani K, Kanda Y, Katada T, Nakano T, Satoh Y, Suzuki N, Kuroda H. Increase of cGMP, cADP-ribose and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate preceding Ca2+ transients in fertilization of sea urchin eggs. Development. 2001;128:4405–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Churchill GC, Okada Y, Thomas JM, Genazzani AA, Patel S, Galione A. NAADP mobilizes Ca2+ from reserve granules, lysosome-related organelles, in sea urchin eggs. Cell. 2002;111:703–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Ruas M, Rietdorf K, Arredouani A, Davis LC, Lloyd-Evans E, Koegel H, Funnell TM, Morgan AJ, Ward JA, Watanabe K, Cheng X, Churchill GC, Zhu MX, Platt FM, Wessel GM, Parrington J, Galione A. Purified TPC isoforms form NAADP receptors with distinct roles for Ca2+ signaling and endolysosomal trafficking. Curr Biol. 2010;20:703–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Santella L, Kyozuka K, Genazzani AA, De Riso L, Carafoli E. Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate-induced Ca2+ release. Interactions among distinct Ca2+ mobilizing mechanisms in starfish oocytes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:8301–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Moccia F, Lim D, Nusco GA, Ercolano E, Santella L. NAADP activates a Ca2+ current that is dependent on F-actin cytoskeleton. FASEB J. 2003;17:1907–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Moccia F, Billington RA, Santella L. Pharmacological characterization of NAADP-induced Ca2+ signals in starfish oocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;348:329–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Ramos I, Reich A, Wessel GM. Two-pore channels function in calcium regulation in sea star oocytes and embryos. Development. 2014;141:4598–609.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Vacquier VD. The isolation of intact cortical granules from sea urchin eggs: calcium ions trigger granule discharge. Dev Biol. 1975;43:62–74. .

  179. 179.

    Moser F. Studies on a cortical layer response to stimulating agents in the Arbacia eggs. I. Response to insemination. J Exp Zool. 1939;80:423–45.

  180. 180.

    Vogt EJ, Tokuhiro K, Guo M, Dale R, Yang G, Shin SW, Movilla MJ, Shroff H, Dean J. Anchoring cortical granules in the cortex ensures trafficking to the plasma membrane for post-fertilization exocytosis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2926.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Longo FJ. Changes in the zones pellucidae and plasmalemma of aging mouse eggs. Biol Reprod. 1981;25:399–411.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Santella L, Alikani M, Talansky BE, Cohen J, Dale B. Is the human oocyte plasma membrane polarized? Hum Reprod. 1992;7:999–1003.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Terasaki M. Actin filament translocations in sea urchin eggs. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1996;34:48–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Vasilev F, Limatola N, Chun JT, Santella L. Contributions of suboolemmal acidic vesicles and microvilli to the intracellular Ca2+ increase in the sea urchin eggs at fertilization. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:757–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Anderson E. A cytological study of the centrifuged whole, half, and quarter eggs of the sea urchin, Arbacia puctulata. J Cell Biol. 1970;47:711–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Lee HC, Aarhus R. Functional visualization of the separate but interacting calcium stores sensitive to NAADP and cyclic ADP-ribose. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:4413–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Limatola N, Vasilev F, Santella L, Chun JT. Nicotine induces polyspermy in sea urchin eggs through a non-cholinergic pathway modulating actin dynamics. Cells. 2020;9:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Yonemura S, Mabuchi I. Wave of cortical actin polymerization in the sea urchin egg. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;7:46–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Hamaguchi Y, Mabuchi I. Effects of phalloidin microinjection and localization of fluorescein-labeled phalloidin in living sand dollar eggs. Cell Motil. 1982;2:103–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Paul M, Johnson JD, Epel D. Fertilization acid of sea urchin eggs is not a consequence of cortical granule exocytosis. J Exp Zool. 1976;197:127–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Chandler DE, Heuser J. Postfertilization growth of microvilli in the sea urchin egg: new views from eggs that have been quick-frozen, freeze-fractured, and deeply etched. Dev Biol. 1981;82:393–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Carron CP, Longo FJ. Relation of cytoplasmic alkalinization to microvillar elongation and microfilament formation in the sea urchin egg. Dev Biol. 1982;89:128–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Tilney LG, Jaffe LA. Actin, microvilli, and the fertilization cone of sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1980;87:771–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Begg DA, Rebhun LI, Hyatt H. Structural organization of actin in the sea urchin egg cortex: microvillar elongation in the absence of actin filament bundle formation. J Cell Biol. 1982;93:24–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Mabuchi I, Hamaguchi Y, Kobayashi T, Hosoya H, Tsukita S, Tsukita S. Alpha-actinin from sea urchin eggs: biochemical properties, interaction with actin, and distribution in the cell during fertilization and cleavage. J Cell Biol. 1985;100:375–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Ohnuma M, Mabuchi I. The 45K molecular weight actin-modulating protein from sea urchin eggs forms a complex with actin in the presence of calcium ions. J Biochem. 1986;100:817–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Chun JT, Puppo A, Vasilev F, Gragnaniello G, Garante E, Santella L. The biphasic increase of PIP2 in the fertilized eggs of starfish: new roles in actin polymerization and Ca2+ signaling. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Gilbert SF. Fertilization: Beginning a New Organism. In: Developmental Biology. 10th ed. Sunderland: Sinuaer Associates, Inc. publishers; 2014. p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Schatten H, Schatten G. Surface activity at the egg plasma membrane during sperm incorporation and its cytochalasin B sensitivity. Scanning electron microscopy and time-lapse video microscopy during fertilization of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Dev Biol. 1980;78:435–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Kyozuka K, Osanai K. Fertilization cone formation in starfish oocytes: the role of the egg cortex actin microfilaments in sperm incorporation. Gamete Res. 1988;20:275–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


L.S. is greatly indebted to Prof. Gaku Kumano, Director of the Asamushi Research Center for Marine Biology, Tohoku University, Japan. Special thanks go to Prof. Keiichiro Kyozuka who has been our long-time research collaborator. The authors wish to thank the technical staffs of the Microscopy Unit at the Department of RIMAR, SZN; Gianni Gragnaniello for the preparation of figures and Davide Caramiello for the animal maintenance.


N. Limatola has been financially supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (SZN).

Author information




L.S. prepared the draft of the manuscript. All the authors edited and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigia Santella.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santella, L., Limatola, N. & Chun, J.T. Cellular and molecular aspects of oocyte maturation and fertilization: a perspective from the actin cytoskeleton. Zoological Lett 6, 5 (2020).

Download citation


  • Actin
  • Calcium
  • Oocyte maturation
  • Polyspermy
  • Sea urchin
  • Starfish
  • Ageing
  • Fertilization
  • Vitelline layer
  • Zona pellucida