Open Access

Green-sensitive opsin is the photoreceptor for photic entrainment of an insect circadian clock

  • Sayaka Komada1,
  • Yuichi Kamae1,
  • Mitsumasa Koyanagi3,
  • Kousuke Tatewaki1,
  • Ehab Hassaneen1,
  • ASM Saifullah1, 2,
  • Taishi Yoshii1,
  • Akihisa Terakita3 and
  • Kenji Tomioka1Email author
Zoological Letters20151:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-015-0011-6

Received: 1 October 2014

Accepted: 13 February 2015

Published: 26 February 2015

Abstract

Introduction

Entrainment to light cycle is a prerequisite for circadian rhythms to set daily physiological events to occur at an appropriate time of day. In hemimetabolous insects, the photoreceptor molecule for photic entrainment is still unknown. Since the compound eyes are the only circadian photoreceptor in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, we have investigated the role of three opsin genes expressed there, opsin-Ultraviolet (opUV), opsin-Blue (opB), and opsin-Long Wave (opLW) encoding a green-sensitive opsin in photic entrainment.

Results

A daily rhythm was detected in mRNA expressions of opB and opLW but not of opUV gene. When photic entrainment of circadian locomotor rhythms was tested after injection of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) of three opsin genes, no noticeable effects were found in opUV RNAi and opB RNAi crickets. In opLW RNAi crickets, however, some crickets lost photic entrainability and the remaining crickets re-entrained with significantly longer transient cycles to a phase-advanced light–dark cycle as compared to control crickets. Crickets often lost entrainability when treated doubly with dsRNAs of two opsin genes including opLW.

Conclusion

These results show that green-sensitive OpLW is the major circadian photoreceptor molecule for photic entrainment of locomotor rhythms in the cricket G. bimaculatus. Our finding will lead to further investigation of the photic entrainment mechanism at molecular and cellular levels, which still remains largely unknown.

Keywords

Circadian clock Compound eye Cricket Entrainment Opsin RNAi

Introduction

Circadian rhythms are about 24-hour oscillations observed in various physiological functions of a wide variety of organisms. The rhythms are controlled by an endogenous mechanism called the circadian clock. The most important role of the clock is to set physiological functions to peak at an appropriate time of day. Therefore its synchronization to the environmental daily cycle is a prerequisite and the clock uses light as a primary cue (zeitgeber) for this purpose. In insects, two pathways have been identified. One involves extraretinal photoreceptors that are confined within or in the vicinity of clock cells. In Drosophila melanogaster and the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), a blue light receptor, CRYPTOCHROME (CRY), that is expressed in a subset of cerebral clock neurons, mediates the photic information, leading to a light-dependent degradation of TIMELESS protein [1-6]. In honey bees (Apis mellifera), another photoreceptor molecule, pteropsin [7], might be involved in this mechanism. The other external pathway plays an additional role in photic entrainment in D. melanogaster. The compound eye contributes to some extent to photic entrainment [8,9]; a subset of cerebral pacemaker neurons also respond to nocturnal dim light through retinal input [10]. In hemimetabolous insects, including crickets and cockroaches, the compound eye is the major photoreceptor and the light information perceived by the eye is conducted through neural pathways to the clock, which is located in the optic lobe [11,12]. The cerebral photoreceptors may exist but play only minor roles [13,14].

The entrainment through retinal photoreceptors resembles that known for the mammalian circadian clock that resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The major photoreceptor, melanopsin, is expressed in a fraction of retinal ganglion cells of which axons project to the SCN through the retino-hypothalamic tract [15]. In the SCN their neurotransmitters, glutamate and PACAP, reset the cellular clock machinery that consists of so-called clock genes [16]. Similar process might be involved in circadian entrainment in hemimetabolous insects. Although investigation of action spectra of photic entrainment of locomotor rhythm showed that long wavelength light is most effective in cockroaches [17], the photoreceptor molecule and their role have not been clarified yet.

In the present study, cDNAs of three visual opsin genes, opsin-Ultraviolet (opUV), opsin-Blue (opB), and opsin-Long Wave (opLW) were obtained by molecular cloning in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, and their physiological roles in entrainment of circadian rhythm were analyzed. Measurement of the mRNA levels revealed that in adult male crickets, opB and opLW were rhythmically expressed but opUV was not. Analysis of the role of the opsin genes in the photic entrainment of the locomotor rhythm showed that most of the opLW RNAi crickets lost entrainability or showed weakened entrainability to light dark cycles. It is thus suggested that OpLW, a green sensitive opsin, is the major photoreceptor molecule involved in the photic entrainment of the cricket’s circadian clock.

Materials and methods

Animals

Adult male crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, were used. They were obtained from a laboratory colony maintained under standard environmental conditions with a light–dark cycle of 12 h light to 12 h dark (LD12:12) (light: 06:00–18:00 h; Japanese standard time) at a constant temperature of 25 ± 0.5°C. They were fed a rodent diet, CA-1 (Clea Japan, Tokyo) and water.

Cloning of opsin genes

Total RNA was extracted from the compound eyes and used for reverse transcription to synthesize first strand cDNA, using Superscript First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix for q-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) or SMART mRNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, California). With the obtained cDNA as a template and primers designed for each gene (Table 1), PCR was performed with a condition of 30 sec for denaturation at 95°C, 30 sec for primer annealing at 55–62°C, 0.5-2 min for extension at 72°C for 35 cycles with Ex taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio., Ohtsu, Japan) or Blend taq-plus (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The purified fragment was cloned into T-Vector pMD20 vector (Takara) and sequenced with BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Sequences were analyzed by Genetyx version 6 (Genetic Information Processing Software, Tokyo, Japan) and BioEdit version 7.1.3.0 (Biological Sequence Alignment Editor, Ibis Therapeutic, Carlsbad, California). We got cDNAs of 879 bp, 613 bp, and 837 bp for opUV, opB, and opLW, respectively. We then performed 5′ and 3′ RACEs to obtain whole (opUV, opB) or nearly whole (opLW) cDNA sequences. The method was described elsewhere [18].
Table 1

Primers for cloning and RNAi of opsin genes, and for real-time PCR of opsin and rpl18a genes

Gene

Forward (5′> > 3′)

Reverse (5′> > 3′)

For cloning

Opsin-UV

GAGTTAATCCACATCCCGGA

AGCTACAGCTTTGCAAGTGC

Opsin-Blue

TGCTCGACCTGCTAATGATG

ATTGCCACAGTAGCGTAGGG

Opsin-LW

CCGCTCTGGCACGGCCTCCTG

GTAGACGGCGTTGGCCTTGGCA

For dsRNA synthesis

Opsin-UV

GCATGCATTGCCTATGACAG

TGCCAAATGCACCAATTAGA

Opsin-Blue

TGGTATTGGTTCTGCCATCA

ATTGCCACAGTAGCGTAGGG

Opsin-LW

GCGTGCTGGGAGTGATCT

GCCACGTCTTGGTCAGGTAG

For real time PCR

Opsin-UV

ACATTCCCCGAGCCAGA

ACCAGTCCATTTCCCACGA

Opsin-Blue

CTTTGCTCGACCTGCTAATGA

CACAGCCTACTTCCCAACCAA

Opsin-LW

CGCTCCTACATCCTCGTCTACTC

CGTTCATCTTCTTGGCTTGCT

rpl18a

GCTCCGGATTACATCGTTGC

GCCAAATGCCGAAGTTCTTG

RNAi

Double-stranded RNAs (dsRNA) for opUV, opB, opLW and DsRed2 were synthesized according to the method described by Moriyama et al. [19] using MEGAscript1 High Yield Transcription Kit (Ambion, St. Austin, Texas). DsRed2 was derived from a coral species (Discosoma sp.) and used as a negative control [19]. A DNA fragment of each gene was amplified with primer containing the T7 or T3 promoter (Table 1). With these DNA fragments, RNAs were synthesized with T7 or T3 RNA polymerases. The same amounts of sense and antisense RNAs were mixed, denatured for 5 min at 95°C, and annealed by a gradual cool down to room temperature. After ethanol precipitation, the obtained dsRNA was suspended in Ultra Pure Water (Invitrogen) and the concentration was adjusted to 20 μM. The dsRNA solutions were stored at –80°C until use. A 303.5 nL of 20 μM dsRNA solution was injected into both right and left compound eyes with the nanoliter injector (WPI, Sarasota, Florida). In combined RNAi, a 605 nL mixture of dsRNA of two genes, i.e., dsopB and dsopLW, dsopUV and dsopLW, or dsopUV and dsopB, were injected. For recording locomotor activity, the treated crickets were housed in the activity chamber in a few days after the dsRNA injection. For measurement of mRNA levels, the crickets were used one week after the dsRNA injection.

Measurement of mRNA levels

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR) was used to measure mRNA levels. Total RNA was extracted and purified with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) from a compound eye of adults. To remove contaminating genomic DNA, total RNA was treated with DNase I. About 500 ng of total RNA of each sample was reverse transcribed with random 6mers using Primescript RT reagent kit (Takara).

The qPCR was performed by Mx3000P Real-Time PCR System (Stratagene, La Jolla, California) using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche, Tokyo, Japan) including SYBR Green with the gene specific primers (Table 1). The results were analyzed using software associated with the instrument. The values were normalized with the values of Gb’rpl18a (GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ Accession No. DC448653), a housekeeping gene, at each time point. Existence of daily changes in expression of opsin genes and effects of dsRNA treatment on mRNA expression levels were examined by one-way ANOVA.

Behavioral analysis

Locomotor activity of individual animals was recorded with an activity chamber made of transparent plastic box (17.6 × 8.7 × 4.4 cm) with a rocking substratum as described by Moriyama et al. [19]. In brief, a magnetic reed switch sensed rocking movement of the substratum caused by a moving cricket. The number of rocking was recorded every 6 min by a computerized system. Water and food were provided ad libitum.

The activity chambers were placed in an incubator in which temperature was kept at 25 ± 0.5°C. Desired lighting regimens were given by a white fluorescent lamp controlled by an electric timer, and the photon flux density was 1.7-17 μmol/m2/s, varying with the proximity to the lamp. Recording was performed under the standard LD cycle (LD 12:12, light: 06:00–18:00) for about one week, then LD cycle was advanced or delayed by 6 h. The raw data were displayed as conventional double-plotted actograms to judge activity patterns using ActogramJ [20]. Synchronization to the delayed or advanced light cycle was judged to be completed when the onset of nocturnal activity peak matched the light-off. The number of transient cycles was defined as the days necessary for re-entrainment after the phase shift including the day on which the shift was made. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical examination of the effects of RNAi of opsin genes on the number of transient cycles.

Results

Daily expression of the opsin genes

By molecular cloning we have obtained cDNAs of three opsin genes, i.e., opUV (GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ Accession No. LC004295), opB (LC004296), and opLW (LC004297), encoding product proteins of 377 aa, 379 aa, and 377 aa, respectively. The deduced amino acid sequences encoded by these opsin genes were identical to those reported by Henze et al. [21] but there were some nucleotide substitutions in each of the opsin genes. In situ hybridization of opsin mRNA revealed that opLW is expressed over almost the whole compound eye except for the dorsal rim area (DRA), opUV in a single proximally located cell in every ommatidium over almost the whole compound eye except for a ventral region, and opB expressed most abundantly in DRA and replaced with opUV in the ventral region (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The expression profile was consistent with that reported by Henze et al. [21] and similar to that in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis [18]. The opUV, opB, and opLW are probably expressed in the retinula cells with a peak spectral sensitivity at 332 nm (UV), 445 nm (blue), and 515 nm (green), respectively, that were reported by Zufall et al. [22].

To examine whether transcripts of the opsin genes oscillated in a circadian manner, we measured mRNA levels of opUV, opB, and opLW, in the compound eye by qPCR (Figure 1). The samples were collected at 4 h intervals starting at 2 h after lights-on (ZT 2: ZT stands for zeitgeber time and ZT 0 corresponds to lights-on and ZT 12 to lights-off). The mRNA levels of the three opsin genes showed a slight reduction at midnight followed by an increase at late night and these changes were statistically significant for opB and opLW (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test). However, no significant daily change was detected in opUV (P > 0.05, ANOVA).
Figure 1

Daily expression profiles of the opUV , opB , and opLW mRNAs in the compound eye of adult crickets. The abundance of mRNAs was measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and expressed as relative values to the abundance of rpl18a mRNA that was used as an internal reference. The values are average of 8 compound eyes. The vertical lines indicate S.E.M. White and black bars indicate light and dark phase, respectively. A significant decrease occurred in the midnight, followed by a significant increase in the late night in opB and opLW (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test). Values labelled with different letters significantly differ from each other.

dsRNA suppressed mRNA levels of the opsin genes

To examine whether RNAi of the opsin genes worked effectively in G. bimaculatus, levels of opUV, opB, and opLW mRNAs were measured by qPCR in the compound eye of adult male crickets treated with respective dsRNA. The crickets were collected at 12:00 (ZT 6). The mRNA levels of treated opsin genes were found to be significantly lower than those of intact crickets (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test), suggesting that dsRNA of the opsin genes suppressed mRNA levels of respective opsin genes through RNAi (Figure 2A); The mRNA levels of opUV, opB, and opLW was 3.0%, 3.4%, and 1.2% of intact crickets, respectively. Slight changes were observed in other opsin mRNA levels but no significant reduction was found (P > 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test). In control crickets treated with dsRNA of DsRed2, a significant reduction by 45% was observed in opLW, but no significant reduction was observed in opUV and opB.
Figure 2

Effects of single (A) or combined treatment (B) with dsRNA of opUV , opB , and opLW on mRNA levels of opsin genes in the adult cricket compound eye at ZT 6. DsRed2 was used as a negative control. The mRNA levels were measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The abundance of rpl18a mRNA was used as an internal reference. The values are average of 8 compound eyes and expressed relative to those of intact crickets. The black vertical lines indicate S.E.M. One-way ANOVA was performed for each opsin genes with intact crickets, and those treated with DsRed2 RNAi and single and double RNAi of opsin genes. Values labelled by different letters significantly differ each other (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test). Purple, blue, and green letters are for opUV, opB, and opLW, respectively. The dsRNAs significantly suppressed respective opsin genes. opLW mRNAs were also suppressed in opUV and opB double dsRNA treatment (B). For further explanations see text.

Similarly double-RNAi of two opsin genes effectively knocked down respective opsin genes (Figure 2B). The opB and opLW RNAi reduced respective mRNA levels to 2.2% and 2.3% (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test), the opUV and opLW RNAi reduced to 1.6% and 1.9% (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test), and the opUV and opB RNAi reduced to 4.0% and 3.3% (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test). Although the opUV and opB RNAi treatments significantly reduced opLW (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test), abundant opLW mRNAs were still expressed (Figure 2B).

Effects of RNAi of the opsin genes on the photic entrainment

To investigate whether the opsins are involved in the photic entrainment of crickets, re-entrainment to LD shifted by 6 h was examined in crickets treated with dsRNA of opUV, opB, or opLW. Crickets treated with DsRed2 dsRNA were used as a negative control. Figure 3 exemplifies the locomotor activity records of crickets treated with dsDsRed2, dsopUV, dsopB, and dsopLW. All of the RNAi crickets treated with dsDsRed2, dsopUV, or dsopB re-entrained to the shifted LD cycles like intact crickets (Figures 3A-D and 4). After the LD phase advance, an intense activity often occurred at the beginning of the new light phase, which was a masking effect caused by unpredictable light exposure of the subjective night (Figure 3A, B, D). The numbers of transient cycles were 5.3 ± 0.9 (average ± S.D.) days, 5.0 ± 1.0 days, 4.3 ± 1.1 days, and 4.7 ± 0.9 days for intact, DsRed2 RNAi, opUV RNAi and opB RNAi crickets, respectively, for advance, and 4.4 ± 1.4 days, 4.0 ± 0.7 days, 4.7 ± 1.2 days and 4.3 ± 0.6 days, respectively, for the delay shift (Figure 4). Some of the opLW RNAi crickets lost entrainability to free-run as exemplified in Figure 3F and G. Even in re-entrained animals longer transient cycles were necessary for resynchronization (Figures 3E and 4); 8.5 ± 2.9 days and 5.5 ± 1.9 days for advance and delay shifts, respectively, and the former was significantly longer than in intact crickets and negative controls treated with dsDsRed2 (P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test). Even in opLW RNAi crickets, a masking effect of light was clearly observed at lights-on when the subjective night was exposed to light (Figure 3E). Interestingly, they also showed enhancement of nocturnal activity peak when the active phase occurred in the light phase (Figure 3F, G).
Figure 3

Double plotted actograms of locomotor activity of intact (A), DsRed2 RNAi (B), opUV RNAi (C), opB RNAi (D), and opLW RNAi crickets (E-G). Light cycles were advanced (A-F) or delayed (G) by 6 h on the day indicated by an arrow head. White and black bars above actograms indicate light (white) and dark (black) phases. Shaded areas in actograms indicate dark phases. DsRed2 (B), opUV (C), and opB (D) RNAi crickets showed re-entrainment to the advanced LD in almost similar time course to that of intact cricket (A). opLW RNAi crickets showed a re-entrainment with longer transient cycles (E) or a free-running rhythm without re-entrainment (F and G). Note all of the crickets showed intense activity bouts at lights-on after phase advance (orange arrow, A-E) or enhanced activity peak in the light phase (blue arrow, F, G) when the subjective night was exposed to light.

Figure 4

The ratio of re-entrainment (A) and number of transient cycles (B) in intact crickets and those treated with ds DsRed2 , ds opUV , ds opB or ds opLW in (a) 6 h phase advanced or (b) phase delayed conditions. The vertical lines in B indicate S.D. The numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of animals used. Note that opLW RNAi disrupted re-entrainment in certain fraction of crickets (A) and significantly lengthened the transient cycles for advance shift compared with intact and DsRed2 RNAi crickets (*, P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey-test) (B).

To further investigate the role of each opsin, photic entrainment was examined in crickets treated with dsRNAs of two opsin genes, i.e., opB and opLW, opUV and opLW, and opUV and opB. All double RNAi crickets without dsopLW treatment re-entrained to the shifted light cycles as exemplified in Figure 5A, while the crickets treated with double RNAi including opLW often lost entrainability to the shifted LDs (example, Figure 5B). A masking effect was observed again when the subjective night was exposed to light (Figure 5). The ratios of animals re-entrained to advanced or delayed LDs were shown in Figure 6A; crickets treated with opLW dsRNA combined with opB or opUV dsRNA lost re-entrainment in 47% and 64% in advance shifts, and 6% and 37% in delay shifts, respectively. The numbers of transient cycles in re-entrained crickets treated with dsopLW combined with dsopB or dsopUV were 6.4 ± 1.4 days (average ± S.D.) and 6.9 ± 1.2 days, respectively, for the advance. Those for delay shifts were 5.3 ± 3.1 days and 5.2 ± 2.6 days for RNAi with dsopLW and dsopB, and dsopLW and dsopUV, respectively. These values were not statistically significant (P > 0.05, ANOVA) but greater than those for control crickets.
Figure 5

Double plotted actograms showing locomotor activity of crickets doubly treated with ds opUV and ds opB (A) and ds opUV and ds opLW (B) that subjected to LD cycles advanced by 6 h on the day indicated by an arrow head. White and black bars above actograms indicate light (white) and dark (black) phases. Shaded areas in actograms indicate dark phases. The opUV and opB double RNAi cricket (expressing mainly opLW) clearly synchronized to the shifted LD (A) while the opUV and opLW double RNAi cricket (expressing mainly opB) did not. Note that the crickets showed intense activity bouts at lights-on (orange arrow) after phase advance when the subjective night was exposed to light.

Figure 6

The ratio of re-entrainment (A) and number of transient cycles (B) in intact and DsRed2 RNAi crickets and those doubly treated with ds opB and ds opLW , ds opUV and ds opLW, or ds opUV and ds opB in (a) 6 h phase advanced or (b) phase delayed conditions. The vertical lines in B indicate S.D. Note that treatment of double RNAi including dsopLW disrupted re-entrainment in certain fraction of crickets (A), and slightly lengthened the transient cycles compared with intact and DsRed2 RNAi crickets (B) but statistical significance was not detected by ANOVA.

Discussion

Opsin gene expression and RNAi

The amino acid sequences of cDNAs of the opsin genes obtained from the compound eye are identical to those reported by Henze et al. [21]. Their expression profiles in the compound eye were also reproduced and were quite similar to those found in another cricket species, Modicogryllus siamensis [18]. Thus the regional pattern of opsin gene expressions is conserved among cricket species and may have some biological significance.

In some insects, opsin genes are rhythmically expressed in both LD and DD conditions [23,24]. A significant daily rhythm was detected also in G. bimaculatus: mRNA levels of opB and opLW genes showed a slight increase after lights off, followed by a significant decrease in the midnight then by a significant increase before lights-on (Figure 1). An insignificant but similar pattern was also observed in the opUV expression pattern. The increase of mRNA levels during the night might be associated with an increase of rhabdom size [25], which may be reflected in an increase in sensitivity of retinal photoreceptor as measured by electroretinogram (ERG) in constant darkness [26,27]. To confirm the role of opsins in circadian sensitivity rhythm, analysis at a protein level is required in future studies.

The role of opsins in photic entrainment

The involvement of opsins in photic entrainment of the circadian locomotor rhythm was confirmed by examining the re-entrainment to shifted LD cycles in crickets treated with dsRNA of opsin genes. When crickets were exposed to a LD cycle advanced or delayed by 6 h, the locomotor rhythm of all negative control (DsRed2 RNAi) crickets, opUV RNAi, and opB RNAi crickets re-synchronized with newly phased light cycles (Figure 4). However, opLW RNAi disrupted re-entrainment in 31% and 13% of the treated crickets for advance and delay shifts, respectively. Even in re-entrained opLW RNAi crickets, the transient cycles necessary for re-entrainment were significantly longer in advance shifts than in control crickets (Figure 4B). RNAi of opLW reduced its mRNA levels without a reduction of opUV and opB mRNA levels (Figure 2A), thus the reduction of opLW levels may result in reduced sensitivity to only green light. Therefore, these results suggest that OpLW plays a major role in photic entrainment, mediating the photic signals necessary for entrainment of the circadian clock.

As to the retained entrainability in some of the opLW RNAi crickets to the shifted LD cycle (Figures 3E, 4, and 6), one may argue the involvement of other opsins, OpUV and OpB. However, considering the loss of entrainability in the rest of opLW RNAi crickets, it seems more likely that those crickets still had an enough amount of OpLW for re-entrainment. A small amount of opLW mRNA survived opLW RNAi might be translated in a certain amount of OpLW that is sufficient for re-entrainment.

The hypothesis that the OpLW plays a major role in photic entrainment is strengthened by the results of re-entrainment to LD cycles in crickets treated with dsRNA of two opsin genes. The locomotor activity of all opUV and opB double RNAi crickets re-synchronized to the shifted light cycles like in intact crickets, while RNAi treatment with opLW combined with opB or opUV prevented re-entrainment in a significant fraction of the treated crickets (Figures 5B and 6). Successfully re-entrained crickets with double RNAi including opLW RNAi still tended to show transient cycles longer than in intact and DsRed2 RNAi crickets.

We have previously shown that 7% of whole ommatidia in a compound eye are enough for entrainment to a shifted LD and that the number of transient cycles are a function of number of ommatidia irrespective of the area of the compound eye [28]. Considering the fact that the opLW is expressed most part of the compound eye (Additional file 1: Figure S1) [21], it is thus most likely that the opLW photoreceptors additively provide photic information to the circadian clock to reset it: The magnitude of the phase shift probably depends on the amount of information, or amount of neurotransmitter, delivered through the opLW pathway. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that light entrainability depends on light intensity of the light cycle [29,30].

The crickets, G. bimaculatus, live in the grass fields where they are surrounded by a green light rich environment [31,32]. It is thus likely that they have evolved to use the green light for entrainment of their circadian rhythm. They may have acquired the high level of opLW expression and large number of retinula cells expressing opLW for this purpose. However, the results of present study do not exclude a possibility that OpUV and OpB play a subtle role in photic entrainment. In D. melanogaster, three opsins, i.e. Rh1, Rh5 and Rh6 are known to play some role as circadian photoreceptor in addition to CRY [2,9,33]. Thus a possibility still remains that the three opsins cooperatively contribute to the entrainment in G. bimaculatus.

Apart from photic entrainment, the crickets showed an enhanced activity when the subjective night was exposed to light by phase shifts of LD cycle (Figures 3 and 5). This positive masking effect of light is known to be induced by a pathway bypassing the circadian clock [29,34]. Since the effect was observed in all opsin RNAi crickets (Figures 3 and 5), it is likely that all opsin pathways and/or ocelli are involved in the masking. Ocelli are shown to express another type of opLW in G. bimaculatus [21], and its role should be examined in future studies.

Cerebral photoreceptor vs compound eyes

In D. melanogaster and the monarch butterfly (D. plexippus), cry1 is believed to be the principal photoreceptor for entrainment of the clock [2,6]. It is expressed in some of the cerebral clock neurons, activated by light, and leads to TIM degradation. In hymenopteran species, however, tim and cry1 are absent in their genome [35]. In honeybees pteropsin has been postulated to play a role in photic entrainment [36]. It is expressed in some neurons in the optic lobe and cerebral lobe which are closely located to the putative clock neurons expressing PDF in the brain [7,37]. In contrast, the cricket relies on only the compound eye for photic entrainment as also known for cockroaches [38,39]. Thus, the clock receives photic information through neurotransmission via several neuronal elements. It is a challenging question why crickets and cockroaches rely solely on the compound eye. The species using cry1 or pteropsin as the photoreceptor are restricted to holometabolous insects that lack the compound eyes during their larval stages, thus they may have to use cerebral photoreceptor for entrainment during development. It is interesting that those insects also use the compound eyes as adults [9,33]. In contrast, crickets and cockroaches are hemimetabolous insects possessing the compound eye from the first instar stage and they use it from the early developmental stage. Thus usage of cerebral photoreceptors might be later acquired.

This view makes sense given a commonality of circadian photoreceptors between crickets and mammals. In mammals, melanopsin expressed in retinal ganglion cells plays a major role in the photic entrainment of the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus [15,16]. Melanopsin is a photoreceptor coupled with Gq type G-protein [40]. Since insect opsins expressed in retinula cells are also Gq-coupled photoreceptors, our results suggest that the insect retinal circadian photoreceptor may have common origin with the mammalian circadian photoreceptors but have diversified to receive different wavelength to adapt to their habitat.

Two entrainment pathways of the compound eye

The compound eye is known to provide photic information also for mutual synchronization between circadian clocks in the two optic lobes. By partial destruction of the compound eye, the dorso-caudal region has been shown to play an essential role in photoreception for the coupling [41]. The photic information perceived by this area is mediated by a group of large neurons, so-called medulla bilateral neurons, which send the information to the contralateral medulla area of the optic lobe, putative locus of the circadian clock [42]. Thus, it is likely that separate pathways are used for photic entrainment and for mutual coupling of the circadian clock in the cricket. Whether common photoreceptors are used for the two entrainment pathways is to be examined in future studies.

Conclusions

We have investigated the role of opsin genes that are expressed in the compound eye in photic entrainment of the locomotor rhythm in the cricket G. bimaculatus. Our analysis using RNAi technology revealed that the knocking down of opLW gene expression either disrupted the entrainment to free-run in LD conditions or lengthened the transient cycles for re-entrainment to LDs shifted by 6 h. However, no significant effects were observed when other two opsin genes, opUV and opB, were knocked down. The data clearly show that the green-sensitive opsin, OpLW, is the major photoreceptor for the entrainment of the cricket’s circadian clock. The retinula cells expressing opLW distributed almost whole compound eye except for the DRA, suggesting that the photic signals perceived by opLW expressing retinula cells probably contribute additively to accomplish the phase setting of the circadian clock. The present study not only extends our knowledge on the photic entrainment mechanism of hemimetabolous insects but also will promote the investigation of the mechanism at the cellular and molecular levels, which still remains largely unknown.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grants from Japan Society for Promotion of Science to KT (No. 23370033). YK was a JSPS fellow. We thank Drs. Kentaro Arikawa and Motohiro Wakakuwa for their discussion.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University
(2)
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
(3)
Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University

References

  1. Emery P, So WV, Kaneko M, Hall JC, Rosbash M. CRY, a Drosophila clock and light-regulated cryptochrome, is a major contributor to circadian rhythm resetting and photosensitivity. Cell. 1998;95:669–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stanewsky R, Kaneko M, Emery P, Beretta B, Wager-Smith K, Kay SA, et al. The cry b mutation identifies cryptochrome as a circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila. Cell. 1998;95:681–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yoshii T, Todo T, Wülbeck C, Stanewsky R, Helfrich-Förster C. Cryptochrome is present in the compound eyes and a subset of Drosophila’s clock neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2008;508:952–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceriani MF, Darlington TK, Staknis D, Mas P, Petti AA, Weitz CJ, et al. Light-dependent sequentation of TIMELESS by CRYPTOCHROME. Science. 1999;285:553–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Koh K, Zheng X, Sehgal A. JETLAG resets the Drosophila circadian clock by promoting light-induced degradation of TIMELESS. Science. 2006;312:1809–12.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhu H, Sauman I, Yuan Q, Casselman A, Emery-Le M, Emery P, et al. Cryptochromes define a novel circadian clock mechanism in monarch butterflies that may underlie sun compass navigation. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e4.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Velarde RA, Sauer CD, Walden KK, Fahrbach SE, Robertson HM. Pteropsin: a vertebrate-like non-visual opsin expressed in the honey bee brain. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:1367–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yoshii T, Funada Y, Ibuki-Ishibashi T, Matsumoto A, Tanimura T, Tomioka K. Drosophila cry b mutation reveals two circadian clocks that drive locomotor rhythms with different responsiveness to light. J Insect Physiol. 2004;50:479–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanai S, Hamasaka Y, Ishida N. Circadian entrainment to red light in Drosophila: requirement of Rhodopsin 1 and Rhodopsin 6. NeuroReport. 2008;19:1441–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bachleitner W, Kempinger L, Wulbeck C, Rieger D, Helfrich-Förster C. Moonlights shifts the endogenous clock of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3538–43.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Page TL. Circadian organization and the representation of circadian information in the nervous systems of invertebrates. In: Hekkens W, Kerkhof GA, Rietveld WJ, editors. Trends in Chronobiology. Oxford: Pergamon; 1988. p. 67–79.Google Scholar
  12. Tomioka K, Chiba Y. Effects of nymphal stage optic nerve severance or optic lobe removal on the circadian locomotor rhythm of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zoolog Sci. 1984;1:385–94.Google Scholar
  13. Waddel B, Lewis RD, Engelmann W. Localization of the circadian pacemakers of Hemideina thoracica (Orthoptera; Stenopelmatidae). J Biol Rhythms. 1990;5:131–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shiga S, Numata H, Yoshioka E. Localization of the photoreceptor and pacemaker for the circadian activity rhythm in the band-legged ground cricket, Dianemobius nigrofasciatus. Zoolog Sci. 1999;16:193–201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nayak SK, Jegla T, Panda S. Role of a novel photopigment, melanopsin, in behavioral adaptation to light. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:144–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Golombek DA, Rosenstein RE. Physiology of circadian entrainment. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:1063–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mote MI, Black KR. Action spectrum and threthold sensitivity of entrainment of circadian running activity in the cockroach Periplaneta americana. Photochem Photobiol. 1981;34:257–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tamaki S, Takemoto S, Uryu O, Kamae Y, Tomioka K. Opsins are involved in nymphal photoperiodic responses in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis. Physiol Entomol. 2013;38:163–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Moriyama Y, Sakamoto T, Karpova SG, Matsumoto A, Noji S, Tomioka K. RNA interference of the clock gene period disrupts circadian rhythms in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Biol Rhythms. 2008;23:308–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmid B, Helfrich-Förster C, Yoshii T. A new ImageJ plug-in “ActogramJ” for chronobiological analyses. J Biol Rhythms. 2011;26:464–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Henze MJ, Dannenhauer K, Kohler M, Labhart T, Gesemann M. Opsin evolution and expression in arthropod compound eyes and ocelli: insights from the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12:163.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zufall F, Schmitt M, Menzel R. Spectral and polarized light sensitivity of photoreceptors in the compound eye of the cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus). J Comp Physiol A. 1989;164:597–608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sasagawa H, Narita R, Kitagawa Y, Kadowaki T. The expression of genes encoding visual components is regulated by a circadian clock, light environment and age in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:963–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang B, Xiao J-H, Bian S-N, Niu L-M, Murphy RW, Huang D-W. Evolution and expression plasticity of opsin genes in a fig pollinator, Ceratosolen solmsi. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53907.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sakura M, Takasuga K, Watanabe M, Eguchi E. Diurnal and circadian rhythm in compound eye of cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus): changes in structure and photon capture efficiency. Zoolog Sci. 2003;20:833–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomioka K, Chiba Y. Persistence of circadian ERG rhythms in the cricket with optic tract severed. Naturwissenschaften. 1982;69:355–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomioka K. Optic lobe-compound eye system in cricket: a complete circadian system. J Interdiscipl Cycle Res. 1985;16:73–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomioka K, Okada Y, Chiba Y. Distribution of circadian photoreceptors in the compound eye of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Biol Rhythms. 1990;5:131–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomioka K, Chiba Y. Entrainment of cricket circadian activity rhythm after 6-hour phase-shifts of light–dark cycle. Zoolog Sci. 1987;4:535–42.Google Scholar
  30. Aschoff J, Hoffmannn K, Pohl H, Wever R. Re-entrainment of circadian rhythms after phase-shifts of the zeitgeber. Chronobiologia. 1975;2:23–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Simmons LW. The calling song of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): constraints on transmission and its role in intermale competition and female choice. Anim Behav. 1988;36:380–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirtenlehner S, Römer H, Schmidt AKD. Out of phase: relevance of the medial septum for directional hearing and phonotaxis in the natural habitat of field crickets. J Comp Physiol A. 2014;200:139–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanai S, Ishida N. Entrainment of Drosophila circadian clock to green and yellow light by Rh1, Rh5, Rh6 and CRY. Neuroreport. 2009;20:755–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Page TL. Masking in invertebrates. Chronobiol Int. 1989;6:3–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhan S, Merlin C, Boore JL, Reppert SM. The monarch butterfly genome yields insights into long-distance migration. Cell. 2011;147:1171–85.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubin EB, Shemesh Y, Cohen M, Elgavish S, Robertson HM, Bloch G. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses reveal mammalian-like clockwork in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) and shed new light on the molecular evolution of the circadian clock. Genome Res. 2006;16:1352–65.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bloch G, Solomon S, Robins G, Fahrbach S. Patterns of PERIOD and pigment-dispersing hormone immunoreactivity in the brain of the European honeybee (Apis mellifera): Age-and time-related plasticity. J Comp Neurol. 2003;464:269–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishiitsutsuji-Uwo J, Pittendrigh CS. Central nervous system control of circadian rhythmicity in the cockroach. II. The pathway of light signals that entrain the rhythm. Z Vgl Physiol. 1968;58:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tomioka K. Chronobiology of crickets: a review. Zoolog Sci. 2014;31:624–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Terakita A. The opsin. Genome Biol. 2005;6:213.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tomioka K, Yukizane M. A specific area of the compound eye in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus sends photic information to the circadian pacemaker in the contralateral optic lobe. J Comp Physiol A. 1997;180:63–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Yukizane M, Kaneko A, Tomioka K. Electrophysiological and morphological characterization of the medulla bilateral neurons that connect bilateral optic lobes in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol. 2002;48:631–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Komada et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement