Skip to main content

Targeted deletion of liver-expressed Choriogenin L results in the production of soft eggs and infertility in medaka, Oryzias latipes

Abstract

Egg envelopes (chorions) in medaka, Oryzias latipes, are composed of three major glycoproteins: ZI-1, − 2, and − 3. These gene-encoded chorion glycoproteins are expressed in the liver and/or ovarian oocytes of sexually mature female fish. In medaka, the glycoproteins produced in the female liver are induced by estrogen as Choriogenin (Chg.) H and Chg. H minor (m), which correspond to the zona pellucida (ZP) B (ZPB) protein in mammals, and Chg. L, which corresponds to ZPC in mammals. Chg. H, Chg. Hm, and Chg. L, are then converted to ZI-1, − 2, and − 3, respectively, during oogenesis in medaka ovaries.

In the present study, we established a medaka line in which the chg.l gene was inactivated using the transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) technique. Neither intact chg.l transcripts nor Chg. L proteins were detected in livers of sexually mature female homozygotes for the mutation (homozygous chg.l knockout: chg.l−/−). The chg.l−/− females spawned string-like materials containing “smashed eggs.” Closer examination revealed the oocytes in the ovaries of chg.l−/− females had thin chorions, particularly at the inner layer, despite a normal growth rate. In comparing chorions from normal (chg.l+/+) and chg.l−/− oocytes, the latter exhibited abnormal architecture in the chorion pore canals through which the oocyte microvilli pass. These microvilli mediate the nutritional exchange between the oocyte and surrounding spaces and promote sperm-egg interactions during fertilization. Thus, following in vitro fertilization, no embryos developed in the artificially inseminated oocytes isolated from chg.l−/− ovaries. These results demonstrated that medaka ZI-3 (Chg.L) is the major component of the inner layer of the chorion, as it supports and maintains the oocyte’s structural shape, enabling it to withstand the pressures exerted against the chorion during spawning, and is essential for successful fertilization. Therefore, gene products of oocyte-specific ZP genes that may be expressed in medaka oocytes cannot compensate for the loss Chg. L function to produce offspring for this species.

Background

In most animals, the egg envelope has several functions, including attraction and activation of spermatozoa, prevention of polyspermy at fertilization, and protection of the developing embryo [1, 2]. In medaka, Oryzias latipes, there are two structural parts to the layers of the egg envelope — a thin, high-density outer layer and a thick, low-density, multiple-component inner layer. During oogenesis, the formation of the outer layer begins during the perinuclear oocyte stage. This step is followed by the formation of the inner layer during the previtellogenic oocyte stage [3]. The terminology of the extracellular matrix (egg envelope) surrounding oocytes differs among groups of animals. In fish, it is the chorion, and in mammals, it is called the zona pellucida (ZP [4];; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustrations of ovulated fish (medaka) and mouse eggs (A and B, respectively). The fish (medaka) egg envelope, also known as the “chorion,” “zona radiata,” and/or “vitelline envelope,” is shown with its two layers — the inner layer (interna) and the outer layer (externa). The single-layer egg envelope in mammals is termed the “zona pellucida”

The nomenclature of the ZP genes and their gene products is confusing because different names have been used for different animal groups. Spargo and Hope [5] classified vertebrate ZP genes into four subfamilies: ZPA, ZPB, ZPC, and ZPX. The medaka chorion is comprised primarily of the inner layers which consist of three major glycoproteins — zona pellucida interna (ZI)-1, − 2, and − 3 [6]. Following Spargo and Hope’s nomenclature [5], ZI-1 and -2 are classified as ZPB genes, while ZI-3 is a ZPC gene.

During the cortical reaction of fertilization, the chorion changes in structure and forms the fertilization membrane. In fish, alveoline [7] and transglutaminase [8,9,10] are released from cortical granules to promote hardening of the chorion by affecting the cross-linkages between the subunit molecules of the ZI-1, − 2, and- 3 proteins. At hatching, these are the targeted substrates of the hatching enzyme [11].

In 1984, Hamazaki et al. reported that one of the chorion glycoproteins was a spawning-female-specific (SF) substance of extraovarian origin [12]. In 1991, using specific antibodies, Murata et al. discovered, in medaka, other high molecular weight chorion glycoproteins were also produced in the liver of spawning females [13]. These results suggested, in medaka, all major components of the chorion were produced in the liver of spawning females. Thus, the previously discovered SF substance was renamed the low molecular weight SF substance (L-SF), and newly discovered proteins were described as high molecular weight SF substances (H-SF) to avoid confusion. The synthesis of L-SF and H-SF as induced by estrogen (E2) in the liver of females and the liver of E2-treated males [13,14,15,16]. The accumulation of L-SF in the egg envelope of ovarian growing oocytes was also identified after injecting radio-labeled L-SF in the abdominal cavity of mature female medaka [17]. The cDNAs encoding L-SF [18] and H-SF [19] were then cloned from the mature female medaka liver cDNA library, and L-SF and H-SF were renamed Choriogenin L (Chg.L) and Choriogenin H (Chg. H), respectively. Based on their amino acid sequences, Chg. L and Chg. H were determined homologs of mammalian ZPC and ZPB, respectively [18, 19]. In medaka, the genes encoding Chg. L, Chg. H, and Chg. H minor (Chg.Hm) [20] are expressed in the liver of sexually matured females and induced by E2. The proteins are then secreted into the bloodstream and transported into the ovary. After modification, Chg. L, Chg. H, and Chg. Hm accumulate and form the 3D structure of the chorion. During the process of accumulation, Chg. H and Chg. Hm are modified to ZI-1 and -2 (ZPB in mammals), respectively, and Chg. L is modified to ZI-3 (ZPC in mammals) in the chorion [21, 22].

Currently, in teleosts, an infraclass of fish that comprises all ray-finned fish apart from early-diverged bichirs, sturgeons, paddlefishes, freshwater garfishes, and bowfins, there are two known sites, the liver and oocyte, of chorion precursor-protein synthesis. The liver-expressed chorion glycoproteins have been cloned in winter flounder [23], medaka [18,19,20], rainbow trout, and Atlantic salmon [24]. In contrast, the synthesis of the chorion glycoproteins in cyprinids (goldfish, carp, and zebrafish) seems to be restricted to the oocyte [25,26,27,28]. Further studies [29,30,31] have been conducted to understand the phylogenetical relation between fish and other animals. Expression of ZP-related proteins in the ovaries of medaka has been reported [32, 33]. However, the functions of these proteins and whether they are actually components of chorion remain unknown.

As mentioned above, the medaka Chg. L protein is homologous to the mammalian ZPC [18]. The functions of ZPC in mammals are well defined [34], and morphological observations of oocytes from ZPC-loss-of-function transgenic female mice have been reported [35,36,37]. For example, homozygous mutant ZPC−/− mouse follicles have zona-free oocytes (i.e., germinal-vesicle-intact oocytes that lack a ZP matrix), and disorganized coronae radiatae. The corona radiata is the first layer of follicular (granulosa) cells outside the ZP. Despite the lack of a ZP, both ZPA and ZPB, but not ZPC proteins, were detected at the surface of the zona-free oocytes. The zona-free oocytes grew and remained in meiotic arrest before maturation, and the remainder of the follicular structure appeared normal. During folliculogenesis, the zona-free oocytes developed but did not form a proper cumulus-oocyte complex. In general, the null (ZPC−/−) female mice ovulated, and cumulus masses were detected in the oviduct, but only a few (< 10% of normal) zona-free eggs were recovered. After mating with males proven to be fertile, no zona-free, 2-cell embryos are recovered from ZPC−/− females. These null females were never visibly pregnant, and they produced no live offspring.

Recently, genome editing techniques using transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) restriction enzymes; clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences; and the CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system have progressed. Advances in TALEN enzymes [38, 39] and the CRISPR/Cas9 system [40], specifically, have simplified and expedited the creation of gene-targeted medaka strains. In the present study, we created chg.l−/− female medaka using TALEN gene-editing techniques to identify the structural and physiological functions of Chg. L (ZI-3) in the chorion surrounding the oocyte during oogenesis and fertilization.

Methods

Fish and tissues

In the present study, an orange, Cab [41] variety of medaka and basic procedures described by Murata and Kinoshita [38] were used to establish a parental (F0), chg.l−/− (knockout; KO) medaka line.

All fish were maintained in an aquarium, with recirculating water, under a 14-h (h)/10-h day/night cycle at 26 °C, at small animal facilities, at the Center for Health and Environment, University of California, Davis and Kyoto University, Japan, following the required animal protocols at each university (University of California, Davis Approval No. 2020649; Kyoto University, Japan Approval No. 27–45). Approximately ten wild-type (chg.l +/+) female fish were randomly selected as controls from the breeding tank. All fish samples were obtained from F1 or later-generation fish whose genotypes were confirmed as heterozygous or homozygous for the chg.l mutation using sequencing or the Heteroduplex Mobility Assay (HMA; 38).

Antibody production

The potential peptides for antibody production were searched using epitope analysis resources (http://www.iedb.org/). The amino acid sequences of the peptides used for antibody production are shown in Supplemental Table S1. The antigen peptides and antibodies were produced in GenScript USA Inc. (Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA).

Design and construction of TALENs

Using TALE-NT 2.0 (https://tale-nt.cac.cornell.edu/) software [42], the potential TALEN target sites were searched with parameters including (1) a spacer length of 14–17, (2) a repeat array length of 15–18, and (3) an upstream base of T only. TAL effector repeats were assembled as described by Ansai et al. [40]. The TALENs were designed in Exon1 of chg.l (NM_001104803), with 15 base pairs (bp) of the left binding site (5′- CATACCCTCCAACAG -3′), 15 bp of the right site (5′-AGATCCCACCCAGCA-3′), and a 16-bp spacer sequence (5′-ggagtaaaacgcctca-3′; Fig. 2A and Supplemental Table S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

RT-PCR analysis of chg.l+/+, chg.l+/−, and chg.l−/− medaka. A The position of the primers used for the analysis. B The result of RT-PCR analysis of chg.l+/− and chg.l−/− medaka. Abbreviations: M – marker; G – genomic DNA extracted from the chg.l+/+ fin with sodium hydroxide; H – chg.l+/− (del-14 heterozygous knockout (KO)); N – chg.l−/− (del-14 homozygous KO). The targeted genes for the RT-PCR assay, primers, size of the cDNA product, and anticipated size of the genomic DNA are summarized in Supplemental Table S2. The primer Pairs for PCR analysis included (1) Chg. L FW1 and Chg. L RV2, (2) Chg. L FW2-del and Chg. L RV2, (3) Chg. H Ex1 FW1 and Chg. H Ex2 RV1, (4) Chg. Hm Ex1 FW1 and Chg. Hm Ex2 RV1, and (5) Chg. Hm Ex1 FW1 and Chg. Hm Ex3 RV1

RNA preparation and microinjection

The TALEN expression vectors were linearized using digestion with Not I. Capped ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequences were synthesized using the mMessage mMachine SP6 kit (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The transcribed RNAs were purified using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to its RNA-clean-up protocol. Purified RNAs were diluted with Yamamoto’s Ringer’s Solution (0.75% sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.02% potassium chloride (KCl), 0.02% calcium chloride (CaCl2), and 0.002% sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3); pH = 7.3) to a final concentration of 300 ng/uL [43] and microinjected into fertilized eggs.

Extraction, genotyping, and sequencing of genomic DNA from embryos, larvae, and adult females

The embryos without a chorion (i.e., chorion-free embryos), hatched larvae, and caudal fin clips from adult fish were lysed individually in 25 μL of alkaline lysis buffer (25 mM sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and 0.2 mM of ethylene diamine (EDTA); pH = 8.0) at 95 °C for 10 min (min). Once neutralized with 25 μL of 40 mM Tris–hydrochloric acid (Tris-HCl; pH = 8.0), the tissue lysates were used as genomic DNA samples. The primer pair for genotyping was Chg. L Fw1 and Chg. L RV1. The sequence and genomic position of each primer are summarized in Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table S1. During genotyping, the thermal cycler was held at 94 °C for a 2 min denaturing step followed by 35 cycles of (1) 98 °C for 10 s (sec) for additional denaturing, (2) 60 °C for 10 s of annealing, and (3) 68 °C for 15 s of extension using KOD-FX DNA polymerase (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). The resulting polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product was directly sequenced by Eurofins Genomics (Tokyo, Japan) using the Sanger method.

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of liver tissue RNA from adult females

RNA was extracted from the liver of chg.l+/+ (normal, wild-type control), chg.l+/−, and chg.l−/− (KO) females using PureLink RNA Mini kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo). The cDNAs were obtained using SuperScript VILO™ Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo) with thermal cycler conditions at 25 °C for 10 min, 42 °C for 60 min, and 85 °C for 5 min. The targeted cDNA fragments were then amplified using KOD-FX (Toyobo, Osaka) with PCR conditions described in the previous paragraph. The primers pairs for this PCR assay were (1) Chg. L Fw1 and Chg. L RV1, (2) Chg. L Fw2-del and Chg. L RV2, (3) Chg. H Ex1 FW1 and Chg. H Ex2 RV1, (4) Chg. Hm Ex1 FW1 and Chg. Hm Ex2 RV1, and (5) Chg. Hm Ex1 FW1 and Chg. Hm Ex3 RV1.

Preparation of liver and ovary tissue extracts for sodium-dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

Tissue extracts were prepared following the procedures described by Murata et al. [13, 15, 16] after cutting the tail and collecting the blood sample by bleeding the fish from the caudalis (caudal aorta and caudal vein). Briefly, for each fish, the liver and ovary were each dissected, transferred into a 1.5-ml tube containing 100 μl of Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 40 mM of EDTA, and homogenized. After centrifugation at 14000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was used as the tissue extract. Immediately after preparation of the tissue extract, SDS-sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol was added at a 1:1 ratio with the extract. The diluted extracts were then boiled for 5 min and stored at -20 °C before use in the SDS-PAGE assay.

Western blot analysis of liver and ovary tissue extracts

SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses were performed following the methods described by Murata et al. [13, 15, 16]. The proteins in the SDS-PAGE samples were separated using 8% and/or 10% SDS-PAGE gels. After each SDS-PAGE assay was performed, the proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-P; MILLIPORE Co. Billerica, MA, USA). The proteins on the membrane were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (CBB), and the SDS-PAGE patterns of the tissue extracts obtained from the chg.l−/− and chg.l+/+ females were compared. After treatment with 1:2000-diluted anti-Chg.L and anti-Chg.H antibodies, and 1:5000-diluted secondary antibodies [horse radish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG; A16096; Invitrogen, Waltham MA USA) and HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (62–6520: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA USA), respectively], the immunoreactive protein bands were visualized using a TMB substrate kit (Vector Lab. Inc. Burlingame. CA).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Ovaries were collected from chg.l+/+ (control) and chg.l−/− females after the aforementioned bleeding step. Ovary samples were pre-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2) at 4 o C for 48 h. After rinsing with TBS, the ovaries were soaked with ice-cold 100% methanol and stored at -20 °C for future use in IHC assays. The paraformaldehyde/methanol-fixed tissues were processed following procedures described by Murata et al. [19]. Briefly, each paraffinized ovary obtained from a chg.l−/− female was cut to 5-μm thickness using a microtome to maintain the structure of the oocytes during the deparaffinization and rehydration processes required for staining with IHC antibodies. The sections were deparaffinized using a xylene and alcohol series and rinsed three times with TBS for 20 min. The sections were then incubated with primary anti-Chg.L antibodies, diluted 1000 times with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and 2% pre-immune goat serum (BTTBSG), and left overnight at 4 °C. Over the next three consecutive days, the sections were rinsed with TBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C with goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA), mouse anti-Chg.H primary antibodies, or goat anti-mouse Alexa 568 antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA), each diluted 1000 times with BTTBSG, respectively. After the final incubation, the sections were rinsed with TBS, mounted on glass slides in mounting medium (90% glycerol, 10% of 50 mM Tris-HCl containing 0.15 M NaCl (TBS; pH = 7.4) with 50 mM N-propyl gallate) and coverslipped with glass.

Immunofluorescence imaging

The sections stained with antibodies as above were observed using an Olympus Fluoview 500 confocal laser scanning microscope mounted on an Olympus BX61 upright fixed-stage microscope (Olympus Imaging America Inc.), each equipped with fluorescence water immersion objectives.

Electron microscopic observations

To elucidate the chorion structures of the ovarian oocytes from chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females in detail, transmission electron microscopic (TEM) observations were performed. The TEM procedures described by Murata et al. [44] were followed. Briefly, survey-thick (about 500 nm) sections of the chorion were cut with a diamond knife (Diatome, Hatfield, PA) and used to produce ultra-thin (about 90-nm) sections from selected areas of the chorion. The ultra-thin sections were placed on copper grids, and the grids were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before viewing via TEM (Philips CM120 Biotwin Lens, F.E.I. Company, Hillsboro, OR, U.S.A). The micrographs were taken with a Gatan MegaScan, model 794/20, digital camera (Pleasanton, CA) and used to measure the thickness of the chorion in chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− oocytes. Fifteen different portions of the chorion in the chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− oocytes were randomly selected. The measurements of chorion thickness were analyzed by a student paired t-test (t-Test Calculator: https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm) and summarized in Supplemental Fig. S1.

Observation of mating and spawning behavior of chg.L −/− females

The chg.l−/− females and normal chg.l+/+ males were separated the night before mating and held overnight in a dark laboratory. Early the next morning, immediately after illuminating the laboratory, the chg.l−/− females and normal males were placed in a single tank and their mating and spawning behaviors were observed and recorded using a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera.

Collection of ovulated and fully grown pre-ovulated oocytes, and in vitro fertilization

The following procedures were taken to observe whether the oocytes produced in the ovaries of chg.l−/− females ovulate and to identify the function of Chg. L in fertilization.

Preparation of oocytes

The ovaries were dissected from the chg.l−/− and control females 2 h before the lights in the facility were turned on, at the time the fish were expected to ovulate. Female fish were anesthetized with 0.03% of tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222). Briefly, each fish was placed on a culture dish (9 cm in diameter), and the abdominal cavity was opened under a stereomicroscope using fine forceps and scissors. The ovaries were gently removed, immersed in a culture dish (3 cm in diameter), and filled with Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium (Thermo Fisher, Vacaville, CA) to allow avulsion of the ovarian epithelia with fine forceps to release ovulated oocytes. The germinal epithelia of the ovary were carefully peeled off using scissors and forceps after the ovulated eggs were obtained, and the fully grown pre-ovulated oocytes were scattered in a culture dish filled with Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium.

Preparation of sperm

Once each mature male medaka was anesthetized, scissors were used to open the abdominal wall from anus to gill along the dorsal peritoneal cavity. The wall and the dorsal peritoneum were then separated using a pair of forceps to isolate and surgically remove a testis. The peritoneum and fat were removed, and the testis was placed in a 3-cm diameter culture dish.

Fertilization

The testis was placed into the culture dish containing the aforementioned ovulated and/or pre-ovulated oocytes in Leibovitz’s L-15 Medium. The medium was then removed and replaced with 1 mL of Embryo Culture Medium (ECM: 0.1% NaCl, 0.003% KCl, 0.004% CaCl2*2H2O, and 0.016% MgSO4*7H2O), and the testis was minced with a pair of sharp forceps to release the sperm and initiate fertilization. The microscope-mounted CCD camera was used to observe the cortical reaction and movement of oil droplets in the artificially fertilized egg during fertilization and later, during embryonic development.

Results

Establishment of the chg.L −/− strain

A pair of TALENs targeted for Exon 1 of the chg.l gene (Fig. 2A) was injected into 50 fertilized medaka eggs, and 12 eggs hatched. Five females possessing gonads with a frame-shifted genome were mated with a wild-type Cab male, thereby producing an F1 generation. When these F1 fish reached adulthood, DNA sequencing of the targeted region was performed from a piece of each tailfin. More than two types of insertion or deletion (in/del) mutations were observed in F1 fish derived from the five founder-females. Among the F1 fish with mutations, two pairs of F1 mutants, with the paired male and female both exhibiting 7 (del-7) or 14 (del-14) base deletions on the target site, respectively, were selected, and their offspring were bred to establish the chg.l−/− medaka strain. Only the results obtained from del-14 KO fish are shown. No phenotypic differences were observed between chg.l +/+ and chg.l−/− males. Figure 2A shows the position of the primers used to confirm the mutated sequence containing the TALEN target region by direct sequencing of the PCR product obtained from the KO larva. Figure 2B shows the combination of primers used to detect the targeted PCR product and the result of the RT-PCR assay. DNA was not amplified with the RNA extracted from the chg.l−/− larva using the primers designed from the sequence containing the TALEN-targeted sequence (Fig. 2B, red letter N). However, it was amplified using the primers designed from the DNA sequence outside the targeted sequence (Supplemental Table S2). The smaller size DNA was amplified from reverse-transcribed DNA obtained from the KO larva and compared with that obtained from the normal larva.

Direct sequencings were performed to confirm the mutated sequence in the TALEN target region. The results revealed that the 14-bp nucleotide sequence was deleted (data not shown). In this strain, the reading frame was shifted, resulting in the formation of a truncated Chg. L protein instead of the mature Chg. L (Supplement Table S3) exhibited in the wild type. In fact, to maintain the strain and obtain the null fish, the heterozygous (chg.l +/−) mutant fish were bred because the null (chg.l −/−) mutant could not successfully spawn eggs.

Spawning of the chg.L−/− females: the ovaries and ovulated eggs

The mating and spawning behavior of chg.l−/− females was similar to those of normal females. However, the chg.l−/− females did not spawn normal eggs. Instead, string-like material containing smashed eggs was observed extruding from the genital pore (Fig. 3Ab). On the day after spawning, the abdominal cavity of each female was opened surgically to dissect the ovary and obtain ovulated oocytes. The sizes and shapes of the ovaries from chg.l−/− (Fig. 3Ae) and chg.l+/+ (Fig. 3Ac) females were compared and found to be similar. However, most of the ovulated chg.l−/− oocytes were smashed, and only a few oocytes with a spherical shape were detected. The chg.l−/− oocytes (Fig. 3Af) were softer than those found in chg.l+/+ females (Fig. 3Ad) and easily smashed when held gently with forceps.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Spawning females, ovaries, and oocytes of chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− medaka. Panel A Spawning females, dissected ovaries, and ovulated eggs of chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− medaka. Aa and Ab chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females, respectively, with a yellow circle highlighting spawned eggs in from the former and a red bracket highlighting spawned string-like materials containing “smashed eggs” from the latter. Ac and Ad Isolated ovary and ovulated eggs from the chg.l+/+ female. Ae and Af Isolated ovary and ovulated eggs from the chg.l−/− female. Panel B Changes in the artificially inseminated eggs. Ba and Bb chg.l +/+ and chg.l −/− ovaries, respectively, used to obtain ovulated and fully-grown oocytes (white arrows) for this “in vitro fertilization” experiment. Bc and Bd chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− eggs, respectively, immediately before insemination. Be and Bf-g chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− eggs, respectively, at 20 min post-insemination (mpi). Bh and Bi-j chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− eggs, respectively, at 60 mpi, Bk and Bl chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− eggs, respectively, at 360 mpi, Bm chg.l+/+ eggs at 120 h post-insemination (hpi). White arrowheads show the perivitelline space in Be, Bh, and Bk. Yellow arrowheads show oil droplets in Bc-h and Bj. Yellow arrows show developing embryos in Bk and Bm. Red arrows show white turbidity, such as emulsions in Bf, Bi, and Bl. Scale bars in Aa and Ab = 1 cm; in Ac-f and Ba-b = 1 mm; and in Bc-l = 5 mm

In vitro fertilization

In vitro fertilization was performed using ovulated oocytes (post-vitellogenic oocyte stage X [3]) and fully-grown pre-ovulated oocytes (post-vitellogenic oocyte stage IX [3]) from chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females to identify the function of Chg. L in fertilization. Ovaries were dissected from chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females and found to contain both ovulated oocytes (Fig. 3Ac-d and Ae-f, respectively) and fully-grown pre-ovulated oocytes (white arrows in Fig. 3Ba-b), both of which were collected for in vitro fertilization experiments. The ovarian sacs were carefully removed and ovulated, and the fully grown pre-ovulated oocytes were carefully isolated to avoid structural damage to the oocytes, particularly in the chg.l−/− ovary. The oocytes isolated from chg.l−/− females (white arrows in Fig. 3Bb) were used for the in vitro fertilization experiments.

As the controls, ovulated eggs (Fig. 3Ac-d) and artificially collected fully-grown pre-ovulated oocytes from the chg.l+/+ ovary (Fig. 3Ba white arrows) inseminated with sperm obtained from sexually mature male medaka resulted in normal embryo development (Fig. 3Bm). In inseminated chg.l−/− eggs, the cortical granule and oil droplet movements that occur in normal fertilized eggs (Fig. 3Bc, Be, and Bh) were observed after fertilization (Fig. 3Bd, Bf-g, and Bj). However, the movement and coalescence of oil droplets did not occur as expected (Fig. 3Bi, Bj and Bl) when compared with inseminated eggs from the control (Fig. 3Bh and Bk). Rather, the perivitelline space was not developed, embryonic development in the inseminated oocytes from the chg.l−/− females was not observed, and the inside of the eggs became cloudy as all of the fertilized eggs died (red allows in Fig. 3Bf, Bi, and Bl) after 360 min post insemination (mpi).

Morphological comparison and TEM observation of ovarian oocytes from chg.L+/+ and chg.L−/− females

TEM observations were performed to identify the chg.l−/− chorion structures. The morphology of the ovarian oocyte was quite normal except for the thickness of the chorion (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Morphological characterization of ovarian oocytes in the chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females. A-C Schematic illustrations of the structure of the ovarian chg.l+/+ medaka egg under different magnifications. B Enlarged illustration at the position of the rectangle in A. C Enlarged illustration at the position of the rectangle in B, showing microvilli (v) from the follicle cell layer (FCL), ooplasm, and pore canal (PC). D-F Light micrograph (D) and Transmission Electron micrographs (E-F) of the chorion in the chg.l+/+ female. G-I Light micrograph of the ovarian oocyte (G) and Transmission Electron micrographs (H-I) of the chorion in the chg.l−/− female. F and I Magnified images of the chorion marked by white squares in E and H, respectively. Symbols – Panels E-F and H-I OL and dark blue arrowheads with a black outline mark the position of the chorion externa. IL and brackets mark the position of the chorion interna. Panel F White arrows mark the position of the pore canal. Panel I Red arrows mark large pore canal-like structures. Scale bars in D and G = 100 μm; in E and H = 5 μm; and in F and I = 0.5 μm

In general, the interna of the chg.l−/− chorion was thinner (less than 1/10 the thickness) when compared with that at the same developmental stage of chg.l+/+ oocytes (Fig. 4H-I, E-F, and Supplemental Fig. S1). The thickness and structure of the externa of the chorion were similar among the two types of oocytes (dark blue arrowheads with a black outer line in Fig. 4E-F and H-I). However, the pore canals in the chg.l−/− chorions appeared crushed, leaving a reduced space for the microvilli to pass through the follicle cell and into the oocytes. Aside from this, abnormally large pore canal-shaped structures that penetrated from the follicle cell layer to the inside of the oocyte existed in the chorion (red arrows in Fig. 4I).

Immunoblotting analysis of ovary and liver extracts obtained from sexually mature chg.L+/+ and chg.L−/− females

Figure 5A shows the immunoreactivity of the protein extracts obtained from the liver and ovary of chg.l+/+ (Fig. 5Aa-b, Ae-f, and Ai-j) and chg.l−/− (Fig. 5Ac-d, Ag-h, and Ak-l) females against anti-Chg.L and anti-Chg.H antibodies. The proteins were also stained with CBB (Fig. 5Aa-d). The staining patterns observed for the liver (Fig. 5Aa and Ac) and ovary (5Ab and 5Ad) extracts were similar for the two genotypes, but the protein assumed to be Chg. L from immunoblot results (Fig. 5) was not detected in extracts from chg.l−/− tissues (Fig. 5Ac-d). The extracts of mature males were analyzed as negative controls; however, no immunoreactive proteins were detected with the two antibodies (Data not shown.). As shown in Fig. 5Ae and Af, the anti-Chg.L antibody reacted only with 50-kilodalton (kDa) proteins in the liver and ovary extracts obtained from chg.l+/+ females. It did not react with any proteins in the extracts obtained from chg.l−/− females.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Western blot analysis and IHC detection of egg envelope proteins in the ovaries of chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females using specific antibodies against Chgs. Panel A SDS-PAGE results showing proteins stained with CBB (Aa-Ad) or immunoreactive proteins with anti-medaka Chg. L (Ae-Ah) or Chg. H (Ai-Al). The numbers on the left indicate the molecular weights of the proteins (blue bands) in kilodaltons (kDa). Symbols - Arrowheasds: the position of Chg. H and Chg. Hm (corresponding to ZI-1 and -2 as chorion components). Stars: the position of Chg. L (corresponding to ZI-3 as a chorion component). No immunoreactive proteins were observed in the negative controls for the Western blot assay (i.e., with primary antibody omitted; data not shown) or the experiment (i.e., the liver and blood plasma extracts from male fish; data not shown). Abbreviations - L: liver extracts. Ov: ovary extracts. Panel B Immunohistochemical detection of egg envelope proteins in the ovaries of the chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females with anti-Chg.L and anti-Chg. H antibodies. Ba, Be, and Bi Transmission light micrograph of the observed ovarian oocyte in the ovary of the chg.l+/+ female (Ba), ovarian egg in the ovary of the chg.l−/− female (Be), and magnified portion in Be circled with red (Bi). Bb, Bf, and Bj Immunoreactivity with anti-Chg.L antibodies in the same ovarian oocyte as shown in Ba, Be, and Bi, respectively. Bc, Bg, and Bk Immunoreactivity with anti-Chg.H antibodies in the same ovarian oocyte as Ba, Be, and Bi, respectively. Bd Transmission light micrograph (Ba) overlaid with Bb and Bc. Bh Transmission light micrograph (Be) overlaid with Bf and Bg. Bl Transmission light micrograph (Bi) overlaid with Bj and Bk. Symbol - White arrows: position of the chorion. Abbreviation - y: yolk. Scale bars represent 500 μm (Ba, Bb, Bc, Bd, Be, Bf, Bg, Bh) and 50 μm (Bi, Bj, Bk, Bl)

Figure 5Ai-Al show the immunoreactive proteins of the liver and ovary extracts against the anti-Chg.H antibodies. The anti-Chg.H antibodies reacted with 74- to 76-kDa proteins in the extracts obtained from chg.l+/+ and chg.l−/− females (Fig. 5Ai-j and Ak-l, respectively). The results obtained from the chg.l+/+ females showed the anti-Chg.L and anti-Chg.H antibodies reacted with Choriogenin L and Choriogenin H, respectively. The immunoreactivities of the samples tested here against the anti-Chg.Hm antibodies were the same as those tested against the anti-Chg.H antibodies (Data not shown). These results suggested the presence of Chg. H, but not Chg. L, in the chg.l−/− female tissue extracts.

IHC analysis of Chg. H and Chg. L in the chorions of sexually mature chg.L+/+ and chg.L−/− females

As shown in Fig. 5B, the anti-Chg.L and anti-Chg.H antibodies clearly bound to the chorion in the ovarian oocytes (Fig. 5B) of chg.l+/+, but not chg.l−/−, females. This result strongly suggested that Chg. L was not present as a component of the chorion in chg.l−/− ovarian oocytes. Because faint signals were detected in the chg.l−/− chorion with the anti-Chg.H antibodies, a portion of the chorion in Fig. 5Bc (red circle) was magnified and observed. As shown in Fig. 5Bi-Bl, the immunoreactive proteins in the chg.l−/− chorion were detected using only the anti-Chg.H, and not the anti-Chg.L, antibodies.

Discussion

As a first step to identifying the function of Chg. H, Chg. Hm, and Chg. L during oogenesis and fertilization, a chg.l−/− medaka transgenic line was established using the TALEN technique. The phenotype and behavior of the chg.l−/− fish were normal relative to chg.l+/+ fish [45, 46] except for the chorions surrounding the oocytes. As shown in Fig. 3Ae and Af, the ovaries in chg.l−/− females contained ovulatable oocytes (i.e., oocytes mature enough to be ovulated), but they were easily smashed when held gently with forceps. Observations made during spawning revealed the chg.l−/− females extruded string-like material containing smashed eggs from the genital duct (red bracket in Fig. 3Ab).

Chg.L is essential for oogenesis

In teleosts, ovarian development has been classified as synchronous or asynchronous according to the growth pattern of the oocyte in the ovary at any one time [43]. Medaka ovarian development is classified as asynchronous, meaning a random mixture of oocytes including all developmental stages is present in the ovary without dominant populations. Medaka spawning occurs every day under breeding conditions. Because of these factors and the softness of the chorion in chg.l −/− oocytes, it was difficult to collect growing oocytes at the same developmental stage. However, two chg.l −/− and two chg.l +/+ stage VIII oocytes [3] were collected from ovaries of different females and observed via TEM. TEM micrographs revealed the chorion interna of null (chg.l−/−) oocytes was less than 1/10 the thickness of that from normal (chg.l+/+) oocytes (Fig. 4I and Supplemental Fig. S1).

Medaka oocytes are released from the body of the ovary into the interior ovarian cavity [47, 48] during ovulation. After ovulation, the oocytes pass through the oviduct to the urinogenital orifice [49]. Thus, the chg.l−/− oocytes in the present study were likely smashed mechanically during spawning as they passed through the genital duct, producing the string-like material and smashed eggs we observed. Given our findings of the Chg. L protein in control, but not null, female tissues or chorions, and the aforementioned fragility of chg.l−/− oocytes, we presume Chg. L (ZI-3) is an essential component of the chorion interna, as it provides support and maintains the structural shape of the oocyte to withstand the pressures exerted against the chorion during spawning. This presumption regarding CHg. L is supported by research into the protein homolog, ZPC, in the mouse ZP. As reported, ZPC-KO female mice produced zona-free eggs, ovulated, and exhibited cumulus masses in the oviduct, but few (< 10% of normal) zona-free eggs were recovered [36, 37], and abnormal cumulus-oocyte complexes were observed.

Chg.L is required for successful oocyte fertilization

The typical pore canals with microvilli were not observed in the chorions of chg.l−/− ovarian oocytes from the present study. Instead, abnormally large pore canals that penetrated the follicle cell layer and extended into the oocyte (red arrows in Fig. 4I) were noted. In medaka ovarian oocytes, the pore canals are the structures through which the microvilli pass (Fig. 4C and F). Chg. L also passes through the pore canals, accumulating in developing chorions [17]. Most of the pore canals in the chg.l−/− oocytes were compressed and crushed (Fig. 4I). Typical microvilli were not clearly observed in the abnormally large pore canals (Fig. 4H and I). The function of the large pore canals observed in chg.l−/− oocyte remains unknown. However, it can be proposed that at least two different functional pore canals exist in medaka ovarian follicles to maintain the physiological condition of growing oocytes and connect the follicle cell layers to the growing oocyte. Despite the lack of Chg. L, the presence of Chg. H was confirmed in the liver and ovary tissue extracts (Fig. 5A) and chorions of chg.l−/− females (Fig. 5Bg, Bh, Bk, and Bl). Therefore, the pathway for the gene products of liver-expressed choriogenins may remain intact in the chg.l−/− ovary and growing oocytes.

No embryos developed in the chg.l−/− oocytes following in vitro fertilization of chg.l−/− females. We observed movement of cortical granules and oil droplets but no perivitelline space development. These observations suggested that in fertilization, during the cortical reaction, the cortical granules released the materials from the oocyte between the oocyte plasma membrane and chorion. This process would normally cause the formation of the perivitelline space, but the released materials, such as alveoline [7], transglutaminase [8,9,10], and lectins [50] — all of which promote hardening of the chorion and form the fertilization membrane that blocks polyspermy — could not interact with the abnormal chorion. This might have resulted in the underdeveloped perivitelline space we observed. Thus, after insemination, polyspermy may have occurred. The micropyle on the surface of the chorion that permits only a single sperm to penetrate the oocyte in teleosts also functions to block polyspermy mechanically [50].

During the early vitellogenic stages of oocyte development in medaka, a micropylar cell differentiates from neighboring granulosa cells. At ovulation, the micropylar cell peels off from the surface of the chorion, and the final form of the micropyle is retained on the surface of the chorion [51]. During oogenesis in the chg.l−/− ovary, oocytes may not form a normal micropyle because of the loss of Chg. L (ZI-3). The resulting abnormal micropyle likely allows excess sperm penetration into oocytes and leads to polyspermy.

Further investigation is necessary to confirm this conclusion. One alternative hypothesis is there may be a normal micropyle, but the abnormal structure of the chorion allows excess sperm to penetrate the oocyte resulting in polyspermy. Another alternative hypothesis is that failure to form the perivitelline space during fertilization in chg.l −/− inseminated eggs may be a secondary effect unrelated to the physiological function of Chg. L (ZI-3). However, the chorion structure is formed by the coordinated accumulation of various chorion components such as Chgs in medaka.

As shown in the present study, it is obvious the lack of Chg. L (ZI-3) in the chorion resulted in fertilization failure. Additional research is necessary to confirm our conclusion that Chg. L also contributes to blocking polyspermy. In mice, ZPC is known to contribute to the thickness of the ZP [52]. Purified ZP protein domains of trout and mouse ZPC (zp domain: [53,54,55,56]) have been shown to form higher-order architectures in the chorion [57, 58]. Given these factors and our findings of a thin chorion interna in chg.l−/− oocytes, one of the functions of Chg. L (ZPC in mammals) may be to thicken the chorion during oogenesis. Unlike ZPC-KO female mice, chg.l−/− female medaka produce oocytes with very thin and soft chorions. In mice, ZPA and ZPB proteins were detected at the surface of the zona-free oocytes [36, 37]. However, as shown in our results, other major components of the medaka chorion, i.e., Chg. H and Chg. Hm (ZPB in mammals), exist as the matrix in the chorion of chg.l−/− oocytes (Fig. 5) with unknown structural-support functions.

Based on our cumulative findings in the present study, we propose the following with regard to the chorion and its structural proteins.

  1. 1)

    Chg.L ensures the thickness and strength of the chorion and maintains the oocyte’s structure when placed under stress.

  2. 2)

    Chg.H and Chg. Hm may polymerize individually or each other to construct a fibrous membrane structure. However, without Chg. L, the resultant membrane is too soft to support the oocyte’s structure during oogenesis and spawning. The interaction of Chg. L with Chg. H and Chg. Hm is crucial for the normal chorion architecture.

  3. 3)

    There may exist other unidentified proteins with functions similar to those of Chg. L and its interaction with Chg. H and Chg.Hm. However, in the absence of Chg. L, the expression and production of these unidentified proteins may be insufficient to produce a normal chorion in medaka.

  4. 4)

    Unidentified proteins in medaka, such as the homolog to mammalian ZPA, may be essential and interact with Chg. L, Chg. H, and/or Chg. Hm to contribute to the complete structures of the chorion. This is supported by results obtained in mice, as the murine ZPB homodimer has been shown to cross-link the filaments formed by the ZPA-ZPC matrix [59]. ZPA was shown to interact with ZPC only after the release and incorporation of ZPA and ZPC into the extracellular matrix as ZP [60,61,62]. The gene homologs to mammalian ZPA have not been identified in teleosts.

Conclusions

The present study suggests Chg. L is the major structural component of the medaka chorion and is essential for fertilization of the oocyte. Thus, gene products of the ovary (e.g., ZPC 1–5) are insufficient for maintaining the integrity of the medaka chorion and cannot compensate for the loss of Chg. L even though they may have different functions in medaka.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

Chg:

Choriogenin

ZP:

Zona pellucida

chg.l−/−:

Homozygous Choriogenin L knock out

chg.l+/−:

Heterozygous Choriogenin L knock out

chg.l+/+ :

A wild-type Cab medaka

BTTBSG:

2% BSA-TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and 2% preimmune goat serum

TBS:

Tris buffered saline

References

  1. Yamagami K. Studies on the hatching enzyme (Choriolysin) and its substrate, egg envelope, constructed of the precursors (Choriogenins) in Oryzias latipes: a sequel to the information in 1991/1992. Zool Sci. 1996;13(3):331–40. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.13.331.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hedrick JL. Anuran and pig egg zona pellucida glycoproteins in fertilization and early development. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(5-6):683–701. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.082580jh.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iwamatsu T, Ohta T, Oshimai E, Sakai N. Oogenesis in the Medka Oryzias latipes: stage of oocyte development. Zool Sci. 1988;5:353–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yamagami K, Hamazaki TS, Yasumasu S, Masuda K, Iuchi I. Molecular and cellular basis of formation, hardening, and breakdown of the egg envelope in fish. Int Rev Cytol. 1992;136:694–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62050-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spargo SC, Hope RM. Evolution and nomenclature of the zona pellucida gene family. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(2):358–62. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.008086.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamazaki TS, Iijchi I, Yamagami K. Isolation and partial characterization of a “spawning female-specific substance” in the teleost, Ory.Zias latipes. J Exp Zool. 1987;242(3):343–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402420313.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shibata Y, Iwamatsu T, Oba Y, Kobayashi D, Tanaka M, Nagahama Y, et al. Identification and cDNA cloning of alveolin, an extracellular metalloproteinase, which induces chorion hardening of medaka (Oryzias latipes) eggs upon fertilization. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(12):8349–54. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.12.8349.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ha CR, Nomura K, Iuchi I. Chorion transglutaminase (Tgase) in fish egg. Zool Sci. 1995;(Suppl):87.

  9. Ha CR, Iuchi I. Purification and partial characterization of 76kDa transglutaminase in the egg envelope (chorion) of rainbow trout. Onchorhynchus mykiss. J. Biochemistry. 1997;122(5):947–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021856.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ha CR, Iuchi I. Enzyme responsible for egg envelope (chorion) hardening in fish: purification and partial characterization of two transglutaminases associated with their substrate, unfertilized egg chorion, of the rainbow trout. Onchorhynchus mykiss. J Biochem. 1998;124(5):917–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022208.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yasumasu S, Kawaguchi M, Ouchi S, Sano K, Murata K, Sugiyama H, et al. Mechanism of egg envelope digestion by hatching enzymes, HCE and LCE in medaka, Oryzias latipes. J Biochem. 2010;148(4):439–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvq086.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamazaki T, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. Chorion glycoprotein-like immunoreactivity in some tissues of adult female medaka. Zool Sci. 1984;13:148–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murata K, Hamazaki TS, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. Spawning female specific egg envelope glycoprotein-like substances in Oryzias latipes. Develop Growth Differ. 1991;34:545–51.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamazaki TS, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. Production of a “spawning female-specific substance” in hepatic cells and its accumulation in the ascites of the estrogen-treated adult fish, Oryzias latipes. J Exp Zool. 1987;242(3):325–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402420311.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murata K, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. Isolation of H-SF, high molecular weight precursors of egg envelope proteins, from the ascites accumulated in the estrogen- treated fish, Oryzias latipes. Zygote. 1993;1(4):315–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199400001647.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murata K, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. Synchronous production of the low- and high-molecular weight precursors of the egg envelope subunits in response to estrogen administration in the teleost fish, Oryzias latipes. Gen Comp Endocrynol. 1994;95(2):232–9. https://doi.org/10.1006/gcen.1994.1120.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamazaki TS, Nagahama Y, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. A glycoprotein from the liver constitutes the inner layer of the egg envelope (Zona Pellucida Interna) of the fish, Oryzias latipes. Dev Biol. 1989;133:10l–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Murata K, Sasaki T, Yasumasu S, Iuchi I, Enami J, Yasumasu I, et al. Cloning of cDNAs for the precursor protein of a low- molecular-weight subunit of inner layer of the egg envelope (chorion) of the fish, Oryzias latipes. Dev Biol. 1995;167(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1995.1002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murata K, Sugiyama H, Yasumasu S, Iuchi I, Yasumasu I, Yamagami K. Cloning of cDNA and estrogen-induced hepatic expression for choriogenin H, a precursor protein of the fish egg envelope (chorion). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(5):2050–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.5.2050.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugiyama H, Yasumasu S, Murata K, Iuchi I, Yamagami K. The third egg envelope subunit in fish: cDNA cloning and analysis, and gene expression. Develop Growth Differ. 1996;40(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-169X.1998.t01-5-00005.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugiyama H, Murata K, Iuchi I, Nomura K, Yamagami K. Formation of mature egg envelope subunit proteins from their precursors (choriogenins) in the fish, Oryzias latipes: loss of partial C-terminal sequences of the choriogenins. J Biochem. 1999;125(3):469–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022310.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kinoshita M, Murata K, Naruse K, Tanaka M. Medaka: biology, management, and experiment protocols, vol. Chapter 3. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 75–87.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyons E, Payette KL, Price JL, Huang RC. Expression and structural analysis of a teleost homolog of a mammalian zona pellucida gene. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(28):21351–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)36930-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hyllner SJ, Westerlund L, Olsson PE, Schopen A. Cloning of rainbow trout egg envelope proteins: members of a unique group of structural proteins. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(3):805–11. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.3.805.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang YS, Wang SC, Tsao CC, Huang FL. Molecular cloning, structure analysis and expression of carp ZP3 gene. Mol Reprod Dev. 1996;44(3):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199607)44:3<295::AID-MRD3>3.0.CO;2-H.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang YS, Hsu CC, Wang SC, Tsao CC, Huang FL. Molecular cloning, structural analysis, and expression of carp ZP2 gene. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;46(3):258–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199703)46:3<258::AID-MRD4>3.0.CO;2-O.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang H, Gong Z. Characterization of two zebrafish cDNA clones encoding egg envelope proteins ZP2 and ZP3. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1446:156–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(99)00066-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Giacco DL, Cotelli SF. Identification and spatial distribution of the mRNA encoding an egg envelope component of the cyprinid zebrafish, Danio rerio, homologous to the mammalian ZP3 (ZPC). Dev Genes Evol. 2000;210(1):41–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sano K, Kawaguchi M, Yoshikawa M, Iuchi I, Yasumasu S. Evolution of the teleostean zona pellucida gene inferred from the egg envelope protein genes of the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. FEBS J. 2010;277(22):4674–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07874.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kawaguchi M, Inoue K, Iuchi I, Nishida M, Yasumasu S. Molecular co-evolution of a protease and its substrate elucidated by analysis of the activity of predicted ancestral hatching enzyme. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13(1):231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-231.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Litscher ES. The fish egg’s zona pellucida. In: Litscher ES, Wassarman PM, editors. Current topics in developmental biology, vol. 130. Cambridge: Academic; 2018. p. 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.01.002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanamori A. Systematic identification of genes expressed during early oogenesis in Medaka. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55(1):31–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200001)55:1<31::AID-MRD5>3.0.CO;2-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanamori A, Naruse K, Mitani H, Shima A, Hori H. Genomic organization of ZP domain containing egg envelope genes in medaka (Oryzias latipes). Gene. 2003;305(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01211-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wassarman PM, Litscher ES. The mouse egg’s Zona Pellucida. In: Litscher E, Wassarman PM, editors. Current topics in developmental biology. Cambridge: Elsevier Inc; 2010. Chapter10.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu C, Litscher ES, Mortillo S, Sakai Y, Kinloch RA, Stewart CL, et al. Targeted disruption of the mZP3 gene results in production of eggs lacking a zona pellucida and infertility in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(11):5431–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.11.5431.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Rankin T, Familari M, Lee E, Ginsberg A, Dwyer N, Blanchette-Mackie J, et al. Mice homozygous for an insertional mutation in the Zp3 gene lack a zona pellucida and are infertile. Development. 1996;122(9):2903–10. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122.9.2903.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rankin T, Dean J. The molecular genetics of the zona pellucida: mouse mutations and infertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;11:889–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Murata K, Kinoshita M. Establishment of proprotein convertase, furinA knocked-out lines in medaka, Oryzias latipes, and unique form of medaka furin-like prorprotein convertase (mflPC). Com Biochem Physiol Part C. 2015;178:169–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu R, Kinoshita M, Adolf AC, Manfred S. Analysis of the role of the Mc4r system in development, growth and puberty of medaka. Front Endocrinol. 2019;213:1-12.

  40. Ansai S, Sakuma T, Yamamoto T, Ariga H, Uemura N, Takahashi R, et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis in medaka using custom-designed transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Genetics. 2013;193(3):739–49. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.147645.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Furutani-Seiki M, Wittbrodt J. Medaka and zebrafish, an evolutionary twin study. Mech Dev. 2004;121(7-8):629–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2004.05.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Doyle EL, Booher NJ, Standage DS, Voytas DF, Brendel VP, VanDyk JK, et al. TAL effector-nucleotide Targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(W1):W117–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks608.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kinoshita M, Murata K, Naruse K, Tanaka M. Medaka: biology, management, and experiment protocols. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 397–8. Appendix 3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Murata K, Conte FS, McInnis E, Fong TH, Cherr GN. Identification of the origin and localization of chorion (egg envelope) proteins in an ancient fish, the white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus. Biol Reprod. 2014;90:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Murata K, Kinoshita M, Naruse K, Tanaka M, Kamei Y. Medaka: biology, management, and experiment protocols, vol. Chapter 5. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2020. p. 205–6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kamide S, Shimizu A, Koido M, et al. Environmental conditions suitable for egg deposition of female medaka, Oryzias latipes. Nat Environ Sci Res. 2016;29:31–9 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi T, Fujimori C, Hagiwara A, Ogiwara K. Recent advances in the understanding of teleost Medaka ovulation: the roles of proteases and prostaglandins. Zool Sci. 2013;30(4):239–47. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.30.239.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakamura YT. All oocytes attach to the dorsal ovarian epithelium in the ovary of Medaka, Oryzias latipes. Zool Sci. 2018;35(4):306–13. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs170210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Suzuki A, Shibata N. Developmental process of genital ducts in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Zool Sci. 2004;21(4):397–406. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.21.397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Murata K., Fertilization. In Jamieson G.M. editor. Reproductive biology and physiology of fishes agnathans and bony fishes. Vol B, 2009; Ch7: 247–330.

  51. Nakashima S, Iwamatsu T. Ultrastructural changes in micropylar cells and formation of the micropyle during oogenesis in the Medaka Oryzias latipes. J Morphol. 1989;202(3):339–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052020304.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Qi H, Williams Z, Wassarman PM. Secretion and assembly of zona pellucida glycoproteins by growing mouse oocytes microinjected with epitope-tagged cDNAs for mZP2 and mZP3. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(2):530–41. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-09-0440.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Litscher ES, Wassarman PM. Egg extracellular coat proteins: from fish to mammals. Histol Histopathol. 2007;22(3):337–47. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-22.337.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kürn U, Sommer F, Bosch TC, Khalturin K. In the urochordate Ciona intestinalis zona pellucida domain proteins vary among individuals. Dev Comp Immunol. 2007;31(12):1242–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2007.03.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu Q, Li G, Cao L, Zhongjun W, Ye H, Xiaoyin C, et al. Proteomic characterization and evolutionary analyses of zona pellucida domain-containing proteins in the egg coat of the cephalochordate, Branchiostoma belcheri. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12(1):239. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-239.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Aagaard JE, Yi X, MacCoss MJ, Swanson WJ. Rapidly evolving zona pellucida domain proteins are a major component of the vitelline envelope of abalone eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(46):17302–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603125103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Darie CC, Janssen WG, Litscher ES, Wassarman PM. Purified trout eggvitelline envelope proteins VEbeta and VEgamma polymerize intohomomeric fibrils from dimers in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1784;2008(2):385–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.10.011.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Litscher ES, Janssen WG, Darie CC, Wassarman PM. Purified mouse eggzona pellucida glycoproteins polymerize into homomeric fibrils undernon-denaturing conditions. J Cell Physiol. 2008;214(1):153–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21174.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Greve JM, Wassarman PM. Mouse egg extracellular coat is a matrix of interconnected filaments possessing a structural repeat. J Mol Riol. 1985;181(2):253–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(85)90089-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wassarman PM, Mortillo S. Structure of the mouse egg extracellular coat, the zona pellucida. Int Rev Cytol. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61502-8.

  61. Jimenez-Movilla M, Dean J. ZP2 and ZP3 cytoplasmic tails prevent premature interactions and ensure incorporation into the zona pellucida. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(6):940–50. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.079988.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Gupta SK, Bhandari B, Shrestha A, Biswal BK, Palaniappan C, Malhotra SS, et al. Mammalian zona pellucida glycoproteins: structure and function during fertilization. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349(3):665–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-011-1319-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Confocal microscopic observations were supported by Dr. Gary N. Cherr at the Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of California, Davis. We also express our thanks to Dr. Rona M. Silva, University of California, Davis, Center for Health and the Environment for her assistance in editing this manuscript. “.

Funding

The present study was partially supported by For Days Inc. (to K.M.) and a JSPS KAKENHI B Grant (Number JP19H03056 (to M.K.)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.M. and M.K. designed and performed the research. K.M. wrote first manuscript draft. K.M. and M.K. wrote the submitted manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Murata.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In the present study, an orange variety of medaka (Oryzias latipes), Cab [41], was used to establish a chg.l−/− line. Tissue samples were extracted from fish maintained at small animal facilities at the Center for Health and Environment, University of California, Davis and Kyoto University, Japan following the required animal protocols at each university (University of California, Davis, Approval No. 2020649; Kyoto University, Japan, Approval No. 27–45).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Summary sentence:

Liver-expressed Choriogenin L is the major component supporting the structure of the egg envelope that protects oocytes during ovulation and spawning, and it facilitates the fertilization success of sperm-egg interactions.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The peptide sequences as the antigens for the anti-Chg.L and anti-Chg.H antibodies. The numbers at both ends of the peptide sequences indicate the positions of the predicted amino acid relative to the first methionine in the cDNA with accession ID.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

The targeted genes for RT-PCR, primers, and the size of the cDNA product and anticipated size of the genomic DNA in Fig. 1.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Predicted amino acid sequence of the chg.l KO medaka. Each amino acid is represented by a one-letter symbol. The underlined peptide amino acid sequence was used as the antigen to make the anti-Chg.L antibodies. Symbol - Yellow arrow: predicted signal peptide cleavage site.

Additional file 4: Figure S1.

The thickness the egg envelopes (chorions) in chg.l−/− oocytes. The thickness of the chorions in chg.l+/+ and in chg.l−/− females was measured using TEM micrographs. Fifteen different portions of each chorion in two chg.l+/+ oocytes and two chg.l−/− oocytes were selected. The measurements of chorion thickness were analyzed by a student paired t-test (t-Test Calculator: https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm). The average chorion thicknesses were 17.65 ± 1.75 μm for oocyte1 (chg.l+/+); 16.16 ± 1.41 μm for oocyte2 (chg.l+/+); 2.568 ± 1.03 μm for oocyte3 (chg.l−/−); and 2.568 ± 1.03 μm for oocyte4 (chg.l−/−).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murata, K., Kinoshita, M. Targeted deletion of liver-expressed Choriogenin L results in the production of soft eggs and infertility in medaka, Oryzias latipes. Zoological Lett 8, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-021-00185-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-021-00185-9

Keywords

  • Egg envelope
  • Chorion
  • Zona pellucida
  • Choriogenins
  • TALEN
  • Oogenesis
  • In vitro fertilization
  • Soft egg
  • Infertility
  • Medaka